Not exact matches
Because most of our energy technologies are relatively mature, my guess is that, over the next
few decades, we're
more likely to see incremental improvements in technology rather
than breakthroughs.
It is worth adding though, that temperature trends over the next
few decades are
more likely to be correlated to the TCR, rather
than the equilibrium sensitivity, so if one is interested in the near - term implications of this debate, the constraints on TCR are going to be
more important.
But if you've been on this planet for a
few decades, it is
more than likely you...
Anyone who has touched a Windows computer in the past
few decades has
more than likely played a little Solitaire.
It is worth adding though, that temperature trends over the next
few decades are
more likely to be correlated to the TCR, rather
than the equilibrium sensitivity, so if one is interested in the near - term implications of this debate, the constraints on TCR are going to be
more important.
Allowing for undersampling, measurement uncertainty and all the other things that make scientific pronouncements fuzzy, Himalayan glaciers are indeed losing mass, and it is
more likely than not that they are losing mass faster now
than a
few decades ago.
As such, the qualifications we look for in Supreme Court justices are
more likely to be found in inside - the - beltway types, appellate judges and government attorneys now
than they were a
few decades ago.