With Republicans holding an 18 - 15 majority and Democrats opposed to vouchers, any expansion would
likely need the votes of Ellis or Olsen.
Not exact matches
The NDP
needs to regain the union
vote as it tacks back to the left and will
likely oppose much of the deal unless it is radically changed to protect Canadian jobs, something no one here has signalled.
Update: May's Conservative party came up a few
votes shy for a
needed majority, making the prospects for a «soft Brexit» all the more
likely.
In real - world elections, there are some systems where is is much harder to
vote tactically than others - you never have perfect information on everyone else's
vote, so the more information that you
need to be able to
vote tactically, the less
likely people are to do so.
Given that low - income individuals are the most
likely to not
vote largely because they
need to work - often being paid hourly and
needing the money more desperately than others, and that low - income individuals are more
likely to be Democrats than Republicans, why hasn't a democratic politician spearheaded this effort that could see increased turnout from their base?
❯ Analysis: The first candidate in the race to raise the $ 250,000
needed to qualify for public financing, Srinivasan is the only legislator officially in the race and is
likely to face tough questions about his
voting record.
To win a Queen's Speech
vote, Cameron will
need the support of the ten
likely Ulster Unionists.
Kolb, who heads a GOP bloc of 50 in the 150 - member Assembly, will
likely have 51
votes, one more than
needed to block an override, after the Nov. 8 elections, when an open seat near Buffalo is expected to go Republican.
The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has of forming a government - with 198 seats out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers of other MP's decided to back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative
votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event of the next election going exactly the same way in terms of
votes then 214 out of 650 is 32.93 % of seats compared to at 198 out of 646 seats - 30.65 % of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives
need Labour to fail but equally they
need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear
likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be
likely to back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be
likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.
Felder has said he's open to that prospect, and would
likely have more leverage within the Democratic conference if he is the person to become the 32nd
vote that's
needed to flip the chamber to Democratic control.
Anyone attempting to unseat him would
likely need to win more than two - thirds of the white
vote and close to half of the black and Latino
vote, in a primary where 500,000 or fewer of the city's 4.5 million registered Democrats show up.
For a sufficiently informed electoral, this
voting scheme should make a plurality victory by an extremist less
likely, since to guarantee a victory the candidate
needs a larger proportion of positive voters to counteract negative voters who don't have strong views between the moderates.
But it's
likely that 33 or even 34
votes are
needed in order to provide political cover for the other GOP lawmakers.
A more
likely scenario is that they remain neutral, which means Cuomo merely
needs to get two thirds of the members who are actually
voting — minus those abstaining.
That means Walsh will
likely need some Democrats to
vote for him if he's going to win.
State GOP spokeswoman Jessica Proud said a Republican running statewide
likely needs to win 30 % of the
vote in New York City.
Skelos insisted there will be help for Astorino, who is also from a suburban county and will
likely need to compete with Cuomo for
votes there.
Obviously there was no
need to give anyone in the public sector a pay rise because they were all fundamentally lazy and, worse still, more
likely to
vote Labour.
He said Klein (D - Bronx) warned that even if the Democrats take control of the chamber, he believes it's
likely at least a few Republican
votes could be
needed to pass the measure.
The added factor of
needing a referendum on AV might slow the process a little, but would also
likely see the Lords more readily accept the changes to the
voting system (not wanting to defy the democratic will of the people).
But the Republican Governors Association would
likely keep running ads in the state, which would trigger matching funds for the other candidates — not a bad deal considering that the more
votes Lamarche and Merrill win, the smaller percentage of the
vote Woodcock
needs to oust Baldacci.
Jay Jacobs, chairman of the Nassau Democratic Party and a former state Democratic chairman, led a charge in 2014 for Gov. Andrew Cuomo not to take the Independence ballot line, which
likely would have doomed the party because it would have led to it not getting the 50,000
votes needed to give it its statewide ballot status.
But Cuomo will
likely face a GOP opponent more conservative than the governor, and will
need to try to sway potential supporters from
voting Republican next November.
While the unloved compromise of AV was
voted down by referendum, the changing nature of the British party system, and the
likely messy outcome of the
vote in May, could well put long -
needed reform of FPTP back on the table.
But what's
needed, they say, is more information about those Wikipedia visitors to translate browsing choices into
likely voting choices.
But this claim
needs to be tested, for there is clearly a plausible alternative: that teachers are not only better educated and more middle class than the average citizen, but also more public spirited, more committed to public education, and thus more
likely to
vote in school - board elections regardless of their personal stakes.
If a measure to increase local parcel taxes for public schools were on the ballot, about half of
likely voters (48 %) would
vote yes — a level of support far short of the two - thirds majority
needed to pass a local parcel tax.
(DeVos's confirmation as secretary remains precarious amid news that two Republican members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee will now oppose it, though she still appeals
likely to get the
votes she
needs.)
A
vote to impeach Rousseff is
likely to prompt an acceleration of much -
needed reforms, such as cutting fiscal spending and revamping the pension system.
But knowing the composition of the state legislature, and the hostility of the Republican leadership in both chambers to Prop B, we knew that we'd have to entertain compromise on some elements of the agreement (at no point, ever, publically, has Pacelle or anyone from HSUS mentioned any thought of compromise — and
likely, this is why they didn't have a seat at the table when it came to this new law), in order to protect the measure for the long term and to obviate the
need for a second public
vote on the issue.
It also
needs a MUCH simplified version that everyone can use to write to their MP, as (i) they won't read anything this long, and (ii) they
likely voted for the Climate Change Act, so
need something that's so easy to understand, even they can not fail to.
Even if a sufficient number of IMF Members would agree on the
need to amend the Articles of Agreement for this purpose, EU Member States would
likely have to make major concessions in terms of their overall
voting share.
If the model showed that no one area could sway the
voting, and the
needs and services as outcomes are achieved for all, then the other boards like the Fraser Valley would
likely be all in.
``... the task force purposely did not provide... detailed business and financial plans»... (information voters
likely would
need to know to
vote intelligently — my comment, B.M.)...» preferring to leave much of the detail up to the leadership of the new association.»