These types of investigations and reconstructions, where there are no available witnesses, do assist insurance companies in considering
the likely outcome of any claims made by persons involved and / or the dependants of any person that may be deceased.
Not exact matches
Although some gamblers
claim to be skilled at analyzing the
likely outcome of a placed bet, this is usually an empty
claim.
FWIW it is my prejudice that the AR4
claim «very
likely» «most
of the warming» etc. is sufficiently weak to be safe against arguments that do not rely on very high sensitivities e.g. a random walk, with the possible exceptions
of some unappreciated dominant forcing or that old standby that «the climate is chaotic to a degree that permits all possible
outcomes».
Building an argument against climate action upon a forceful
claim about the most
likely outcome of greenhouse gas emissions is to build an argument upon analytic sand.
Even if
claims against individual health care providers were
likely to be successful, it should be added that tort law challenges to individual decision - makers may not be ideal from the perspective
of patients with rare diseases as a group, as the individualized
outcome in tort cases does not necessarily lead to the larger, policy change desired by many patients.
Faced with an argument that NICE's refusal to disclose the model was
of itself a distinct and challengeable decision and the claimant had therefore unduly delayed in bringing a
claim, having waited (some 18 months) for the final
outcome of the decision - making process, Richards LJ indicated (albeit apparently obiter) that he considered it more
likely that an earlier challenge would have been considered premature and inappropriate, as the
outcome of the process as a whole was unclear and may have proved acceptable to the claimant.
While the participation agreement prohibits threatening litigation, the lawyer's advice to his or her client as to the strengths and merits
of his or her
claim will always include an assessment
of the
likely outcome if the case had to be litigated.
The lawyers involved need to consider the actual, real - life
likely outcomes of «all»
of the potential scenarios that «can» be produced by a tribunal's decision, and decide which «one» would realistically provide the best
outcome for the consuming real estate public, and not just for a particular dissaffected former Realtor
claiming to be acting as a reasonable facsimile
of a modern day Robin Hood (my interpretation
of Dale's apparent
claim to have spent years studying ways and means to provide real estate services equal to or superior to current standards via CREA's operations at much less cost to consumers), all the while projecting profits
of hundreds
of millions
of dollars (it's 50/50 that «Robin Hood» is a myth).