Sentences with phrase «likely range of outcomes»

We can help you understand the process options, review & court procedure, ensure that you meet filing deadlines, help you develop a compelling legal argument for court, mediation or negotiations, and advise you as to the likely range of outcomes.

The likely range of outcomes is below 153.5 %.

The likely range of outcomes is below 153.5 % (80 % probability).

The likely range of outcomes is between 45.5 % and 75.5 %.

Instead, most modelers accommodate the inevitable uncertainties by averaging over many runs of each scenario and displaying a likely range of outcomes, much like landfall forecasts for hurricanes.

Not exact matches

Another four - loss season appears to be the most likely scenario, but the range of outcomes here is enormous.

The authors believe their findings can be used by land managers to predict likely outcomes related to forthcoming disturbances occurring as a result of grid development, and that protecting unaltered landscapes from fragmentation by transmission lines, roads, crested wheatgrass plantings and the invasion of other non-native vegetation is integral to stemming range expansion by ravens.

According to research, there exists a range of sodium intake that likely confers the best health outcomes for most people.

It tells you the full range of likely outcomes based on current valuations.

The Outcome Matrix does not include confidence limits directly, but it does bound the range of likely outcomes.

Quarterly outlook stats from the CMHC shows that housing starts will be in the range of 210,800 to 216,600 units this year, with the likely outcome of roughly 213,700 starts.

The CMHC is currently forecasting existing homes sales to slow to a range of 449,200 to 465,600 this year, estimating a likely outcome of 457,400.

Instead, you're dealing with a range of possible outcomes and what's more likely to happen.

For the future P / E, one can apply a variety of historically observed P / E ratios in order to obtain a range of reasonable projections, but the most likely outcome turns out to be somewhere between the historical mean and median.

Nonetheless, as best we can tell from these studies, the most likely non-adjusted return outcome is in the 4 to 6 % range for stocks, as opposed to the historical average of 10 %.

Even given a wide range of potential future outcomes, it appears very likely that stocks will always provide substantially better returns than bonds.

First, as Schneider showed [Stephen H. Schneider of Stanford University], the I.P.C.C. scenarios are tilted towards the low end of the temperature range — thus the low - medium temperature range is exactly a more likely outcome.

Climate science says, «this is a range given our inability to completely predict massive human and insitutional actions and the availability and development of technology, so here are some scenarios — if the conditions are X0, we see X1 as a likely outcome.

We see X0, Y0 and Z0 as being in the range of likely outcomes.»

Scientists had tried to look into the future by extrapolating the visible trends and forces along a single line, calculating a most likely outcome within a range of possibilities: «global average temperature will rise three degrees plus or minus 50 %» or the like.

However, I am not a «warmista» by any means — we do not know how to properly quantify the albedo of aerosols, including clouds, with their consequent negative feedback effects in any of the climate sensitivity models as yet — and all models in the ensemble used by the «warmistas» are indicating the sensitivities (to atmospheric CO2 increase) are too high, by factors ranging from 2 to 4: which could indicate that climate sensitivity to a doubling of current CO2 concentrations will be of the order of 1 degree C or less outside the equatorial regions (none or very little in the equatorial regions)- i.e. an outcome which will likely be beneficial to all of us.

Taking all this into account, the most likely outcomes of RCP8.5 up to 2100 are projected by the red range in Figure SPM.7 (a) on p. 21 of WG1AR5:

Particular, or a range of, occurrences / outcomes of an uncertain event owning a probability of are said to be: > 99 % Virtually certain; > 90 % Very likely; > 66 % Likely; 33 to 66 % About as likely as not; < 33 % Unlikely; < 10 % Very unlikely; < 1 % Exceptionally unllikely; > 66 % Likely; 33 to 66 % About as likely as not; < 33 % Unlikely; < 10 % Very unlikely; < 1 % Exceptionally unlLikely; 33 to 66 % About as likely as not; < 33 % Unlikely; < 10 % Very unlikely; < 1 % Exceptionally unllikely as not; < 33 % Unlikely; < 10 % Very unlikely; < 1 % Exceptionally unlikely.

«The point of the paper is to present a broad range of feasible electricity market outcomes, demonstrate the economic impact, and allow the reader to judge what they think is most likely and what is the appropriate trade - off between perceived benefits of the RPS and its demonstrable economic costs,» said lead author Orphe Divounguy.

The most likely outcome is definitely on the low end of the IPCC range.

The envelope of possibilities for which one must be prepared is often more important than the most likely future outcome, especially when the range of outcomes includes those that are particularly severe (de Perez et al 2014).

The Royal Commission produced its recommendation after considering a range of emissions scenarios and their likely outcomes in terms of global temperature changes.

Apart from this, the way to get around the whiplash problem is to get rid of the mindset and decision analytic framework whereby policies are based on a most likely outcome (with an uncertainty range), determined from a negotiated consensus about a highly uncertain topic.

But given that carbon dioxide levels were now substantially higher than anything in the past two millions of years, in either glacials or interglacials, it had become abundantly clear that the greenhouse effect was something we needed to take extremely seriously: even if the precise future increase in temperature was still an unknown quantity, with a fairly wide error - range, models indicated that for a doubling of carbon dioxide from pre-industrial levels, a rise of three degrees celsius as a global average was the most likely outcome.

I would invariably respond that the early involvement of lawyers would result in the parties receiving an explanation of the law and the range of likely outcomes, thereby minimizing unreasonable positions and moving the parties toward settlement, as I have described elsewhere.

This does not mean that lawyers shouldn't explain the range of likely outcomes — this is of course a key obligation when giving advice on a settlement — but lawyers should give some deference to the client's decision and to refrain from encouraging litigation by unreasonable promises of vastly improved outcomes.

Whilst there is usually a range of likely outcomes, this can be very frustrating for both lawyers and clients.

I have also written about how legislation on domestic relations that fails to restrict the range of likely outcomes encourages a single - serving approach to justice that, in serving the individual well, creates uncertainty and a muddled body of case law for everyone else.

I've also written about the how the chances of settlement improve when individuals» expectations as to outcome lie within the range of likely results and how the chances of settlement correspondingly diminish when litigants have unrealistically high expectations, and will say no more on the matter.

While the case concerns a local school board's restroom policy, it's outcome will likely be felt throughout the Fourth Circuit (including Virginia, Maryland, West Virginia, and the Carolinas) in a wide range of public and professional circumstances.

Whatever the outcome, this will throw up a range of issues likely to cause additional work across many practice areas.

Acquire data from similar matters within the firm and from outside sources to determine a range of likely outcomes.

But even without a final consensus emerging, it has been interesting to see how even a modest narrowing of the range of likely policy outcomes has been enough to dramatically change the environment for carbon market participants.

They are an essential source of initial guidance for people who have just discovered they have a legal problem, and provide a critical understanding of the lay of the land and the range of likely outcomes; for people who...

Ideally, there should be only fractional portions of each party's position that are not shared with both the range of likely outcomes and the position of the other side.

The program would then provide both parties with the results of its property and debt calculations, and, for each issue remaining in dispute, identify to each party any aspects of their positions that are close to or at the limits of the range of likely outcomes and offer each party the opportunity to amend his or her position in light of the new information.

By «rational position,» I mean a coherent legal position that lies somewhere within the range of probable outcomes, even though the range of likely outcomes may itself be unfair to the individual, as I've discussed elsewhere.

Our firm has developed sample «conclusory» language, ranging from being highly confident in your opinion at the one extreme to being highly uncertain as to the likely outcome at the other extreme, with varying degrees of language in between.

At the commencement of a dispute, the parties» positions will bear a greater or lesser relationship with rationality depending on the extent to which each position is within the range of likely outcomes.

The job of the lawyer for each side is to push the client's position as much toward the range of likely outcomes as possible, after giving proper legal advice and making a good effort to reframe the client's perceptions of the situation, particularly where the client's position is irrational and lies well outside the range.

The program would then determine a midpoint compromise for each disagreement and verify that the midpoint lies within the range of likely outcomes.

The program would firstly flag any irrational positions taken by a party — defined as positions lying outside the range of likely outcomes — and adjust the party's position to the rational position closest to their preferred outcome.

Providing that the parties» counsel have a relatively common understanding of the facts and the applicable law, the result of the lawyers» efforts also should be to push the parties» positions together, within the range of likely outcomes, thereby maximizing the likelihood of settlement.

With appropriate heuristics and a continuing input of case law, the software could even monitor and adjust the range of likely outcomes on an ongoing basis as the law evolves.

In a trial with children initially within the clinical range, Webster - Stratton et al. [5] found that post-treatment child behaviour scores remaining within the clinical range was a predictor of adolescent engagement in delinquent acts; achieving post-treatment scores within the normal range was more likely to result in better long - term outcomes.