Sentences with phrase «likely yield growth»
They are also misled to believe that CO2 is polluting the oceans through acidification but there is nothing unnatural or unprecedented about current measurements of ocean water pH and a future rise in pCO2 will likely yield growth benefits to corals and other sea life.»
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/ Not exact matches
Demographics and subdued productivity growth will likely keep yields low.
The «demographic time - bomb» of aging populations is likely to hold down yields and limit the growth that supports stock prices.
Korean leaders to meet at North - South border on Friday: BBC Chinese geologists say N. Korea's main nuclear test site has likely collapsed: WaPo China air force intimidates Taiwan with military flights around island: Reuters Conservative Supreme Court justices appear to back Trump's travel ban: The Hill French president expects Trump will withdraw from Iranian nuclear deal: BBC Rising interest rates keep Wall Street on edge: CBS Investors will focus on various inflation numbers in days ahead: Bloomberg A closer look at the 10 - year Treasury yield's rise to 3 %: Calafia Beach Pundit T. Rowe Price's assets under mgt top $ 1 trillion — a sign of active mgt growth: P&I World trade volume slumped 0.4 % in Feb, first monthly loss since Oct: CPB
Combined with low growth and aging population, this is likely to hold down long - term bond yields in Europe and Japan.
Bond yields have likely bottomed out, and we don't see scope for big rises in already elevated stock market valuations amid tepid earnings growth.
Structural factors such as aging populations, poor productivity growth and high debt levels mean historically low government bond yields are likely here to stay.
Also, rising rates / yields will likely be for a good reason — because growth proves to be better than generally expected.
If you buy stock in an overvalued company, your returns are likely to be less than the sum of dividend yield and dividend growth.
Therefore, they're most likely to hold beaten down dividend payers and high yielding REITs, neither of which necessarily present the opportunity for years upon years of dividend growth.
Our model indicates that going forward, long - term yields will likely be subject to three upward pressures: (1) Our forecasted increase in inflation will boost nominal GDP growth; (2) As forward guidance is replaced by a data - dependent monetary tightening, volatility in short rates will increase; and (3) As the impact of QE on the Treasury market fades, long - term yields will trend back to their historical link with nominal GDP growth.
A stumble in such efforts is likely to revive old concerns over secular stagnation and push investors back toward old habits, namely a preference for yield and stable growth.
It's the absence of productive real investment, which since 2000 has slumped to a small fraction of its historical growth rate, along with the encouragement of rank yield - seeking speculation by the Fed, that has repeatedly injured the U.S. economy, and is likely to insult the economy with further crises before any durable lessons are learned.
Of course, it is people who invent novel goods and services, but the structure of the web itself singles out where invention and investment are likely to yield a profit and drive growth.
With a good dividend growth rate and yield, you are likely to beat inflation and still grow your income every year.
A stumble in such efforts is likely to revive old concerns over secular stagnation and push investors back toward old habits, namely a preference for yield and stable growth.
Structural factors such as aging populations, poor productivity growth and high debt levels mean historically low government bond yields are likely here to stay.
The yields on mortgage REITs are attractive — MORT yields just under 10 % — but it is not realistic to expect much in the way of dividend growth going forward, and dividend shrinkage might actually be the more likely scenario.
For example, investors can determine when a value strategy might be likely to outperform by looking at the spread between the dividend yields of value and growth stocks over time.
Therefore, they're most likely to hold beaten down dividend payers and high yielding REITs, neither of which necessarily present the opportunity for years upon years of dividend growth.
If we get a strong headline reading and better than expected growth in wages, we will likely see investors move more into stocks and out of bonds, pushing up the Treasury yields and mortgage rates.
While this is slightly below the REIT's historical 8.6 % growth rate, it's likely to continue making STORE a growth leader in this high - yield sector.
Rather than rely on past averages to forecast future returns, we use a building - block approach that adds current yield, likely long - term growth in income, and some mean reversion in valuation multiples to create forward - looking returns.
To get to 20 % returns you'd have to have a stock yielding 10 % and growing at 10 %... which is obviously not possible, but would rather more likely and realistically require a vastly undervalued security with very high growth prospects as well as P / E expansion.
That being said, even at today's historically attractive valuation multiples, investors should likely only expect to earn a potential total annual return of about 5.9 % to 6.9 % (1.9 % yield plus 4 % to 5 % annual earnings growth) over the next decade, far below the company's historical return rate and the returns offered by most other dividend aristocrats.
Dividend yields are likely to be about 3 % or so (more growth = lower dividend yield).
I'm merely stating that after funding the pension (in line with mgmt comments) and paying the expected dividend (while not an obligation to shareholders, mgmt knows the company's relative valuation is at least partially based on its yield relative to peers and will not likely cut it) there is no capital left for growth, share repurchaes or to raise the dividend.
General Mills is likely fairly valued at this time given its future growth prospects, high yield, and low risk (in relation to most other stocks).
This means that securities that generally do well in a solid growth backdrop, such as stocks and high - yield bonds, are likely to underperform as they are dependent on a level of growth to support their valuations.
This gives us an earnings yield of 7,6 % which will most likely translate into a similar dividend yield under the current capital management policy as the business needs very little capital for growth.
But I think if your going after 10 % total returns, your growth rate will likely be what's left after backing out your yield.
Conclusion Despite a low current dividend yield, the company's healthy cash reserves and sustained growth is likely to make Infosys a dividend earning stream for long term investors.
The good news is that rising interest rates will also likely push up cash yields on new properties which should help the REIT continue finding profitable growth opportunities.
Past actual stastistics, which I have shown, tell us it is likely that increased CO2 plus slightly higher temperatures, especially at higher latitudes, COULD be BENEFICIAL (rather than harmful) to plant growth and overall crop yields.
say it has been predicted that «the average temperature in the semiarid northwest portion of China in 2050 will be 2.2 °C higher than it was in 2002,» and they report that based on the observed results of their study, this increase in temperature «will lead to a significant change in the growth stages and water use of winter wheat,» such that «crop yields at both high and low altitudes will likely increase,» by 2.6 % at low altitudes and 6.0 % at high altitudes... Even without the benefits of the aerial fertilization effect and the anti-transpiration effect of the ongoing rise in the air's CO2 content, the increase in temperature that is predicted by climate models for the year 2050, if it ever comes to pass, will likely lead to increases in winter wheat production in the northwestern part of China, not the decreases that climate alarmists routinely predict.»
Climate change is already dragging down crop yields, a trend that is likely to continue at the same time that population growth ensures that food demand will be rising, the report found.
So, if the S&P appreciates 4 % and has a 2 % dividend yield, then the total return will be 6 % - BUT, this is likely not the case in an IUL since dividends are typically not part of the growth calculation.