«Efforts should be made to
limit air pollution emissions, with more emphasis on moving towards cleaner cities with fewer cars and more efficient public transport.»
Not exact matches
Reducing certain kinds of
air pollution could
limit the rise of ocean waters and buy time to address CO2
emissions.
The analysis — «a determination of whether
emissions cause or contribute to
air pollution which may... endanger public health,» as EPA describes it — would set the stage for an eventual new regulation
limiting airplanes»
emissions.
U.S. Supreme Court justices offered President Barack Obama's administration some encouragement on Tuesday as they weighed the lawfulness of a federal regulation
limiting air pollution that crosses state lines, mostly
emissions from coal - fired power plants.
In August, the EPA issued rules to
limit air pollution by volatile organic compounds from «fracking» which should, as a by - product, also reduce
emissions of methane.
A speed
limit also would cut back on
air pollution, and greenhouse gas
emissions and underwater noise, which can harm whales.
--
Limiting the construction and use of the least - efficient coal - fired power plants delivers more than 20 % of the
emissions reduction and helps curb local
air pollution.
The challengers next claim is that EPA is completely barred from
limiting power plants» dangerous carbon
pollution because EPA has already used another part of the law — Section 112 — to curb the same plants»
emissions of mercury and other hazardous
air pollutants.
According to the IPCC, the costs of reducing
emissions to
limit warming to below 2C are modest, even before taking into account co-benefits such as energy - security benefits and health improvement due to reduced
air pollution.
Operators of these types of boilers will have three years to reduce toxic
air pollution and meet new
emissions limits.
This would help increase energy security and also
limit air pollution and CO2
emissions in a cost - effective way.
Simply put,
limiting sulphur oxides
emissions from ships reduces
air pollution and results in a cleaner environment.
For the short term, carbon pricing and more stringent
pollution control regulations may be used to reduce
emissions, minimise local
air pollution, and
limit and ultimately phase out generation from subcritical coal - fired power stations.
As for carbon
emissions, Monday's ruling concerns a provision of the Clean
Air Act that is entirely separate from the one that underlies the Clean Power Plan to
limit greenhouse gas
pollution.
That means when it comes to clouds anthropogenic forcing is not
limited to GHG
emissions, but also includes [other forms of]
air pollution.
Campaigners have welcomed the EU's adoption of new
air pollution limits that could significantly reduce toxic
emissions from Europe's dirtiest power plants.
While the EPA has, under the Clean
Air Act put federal
limits on toxic
emissions of arsenic, mercury, and lead
pollution that power plants emit — as well as on pollutants like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides — there are currently no such
limits on the carbon
emissions from new or existing power plants.
Section 115 authorizes EPA to require states to
limit emissions of «any
air pollutant» that may «cause or contribute to
air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare in a foreign country.»
In a Wall Street Journal op - ed attacking EPA's proposal to
limit toxic
air pollution from coal - and oil - fired power plants, Willie Soon and Paul Driessen obscure the challenges posed by U.S. mercury
emissions, which they say pose «minuscule risks.»