The book is about the systematic errors that
limit human judgment.
Not exact matches
Which seems a little bit of a discouraging sign about the
limits of
human judgment, but ties in nicely with the final and perhaps simplest tip.
We vastly underestimate the role of context in controlling
human behavior and instead base our
judgments on extremely
limited information.
That biblical vision helped form the bedrock convictions of the American idea: that government stood under the
judgment of divine and natural law; that government was
limited in its reach into
human affairs, especially the realm of conscience; that national greatness was measured by fidelity to the moral truths taught by revelation and inscribed in the world by a demanding yet merciful God; that only a virtuous people could be truly free.
He has strong individual motivations;
human qualities such as creative imagination and personal
judgment are essential, as Polanyi has pointed out.8 But only
limited aspects of the scientist's personality are directly related to the work itself.
If we accept the account of
human nature given by the Western theological and philosophical traditions — that we are free, rational beings,
limited and imperfect, prone to diversity of opinion and errors in
judgment — we may be more inclined to be not only tolerant but gracious and loving toward those with whom we disagree.
Humans participate in this, but due to our rebellion against God, came under His
judgment, and unable to make right
judgments on our own, and so our role in God's justice is
limited.