Moreover, the Senate bill that would fund DOE — the so - called energy and water bill — hangs in limbo, thanks to the political battle over the Obama administration's plan to use Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations to set new
limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, especially those that burn coal.
The agency denied California a waiver under the Clean Air Act that would allow it (and indirectly at least a dozen other states following California's lead) to
set limits on carbon dioxide emissions from motor vehicles.
Despite this early knowledge about climate change, electric utilities have continued to invest heavily in fossil fuel power generation over the past half a century, and since 1988 some have engaged in ongoing efforts to sow doubt about climate science and block
legal limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants.
The Obama administration
proposed limits on carbon dioxide emissions from new US power plants Friday, taking a big step toward fulfilling a long - sought goal of fighting climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Nearly 20 U.S. states have started implementing former president Barack Obama's Clean Power Plan, which
places limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants in an effort to reduce the impacts of climate change.
At the same time, renewable energy technology is improving and becoming cheaper; regional and municipal governments are
adopting limits on carbon dioxide emissions; and carmakers around the world are working to make electric cars and batteries more efficient and affordable.
The results echo a similar study undertaken by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, which found that Americans «support setting
strict limits on carbon dioxide emissions from existing coal - fired plants,» by a nearly 2 - to - 1 margin — «even if the cost of electricity to consumers and companies increases.»
The U.S. Chamber's position on climate has put the powerful trade group at odds with some leading members who support
EPA limits on carbon dioxide emissions, including board member Florida Power & Light.
After decades of delaying any meaningful national climate policy, America was poised to finally enact
moderate limits on carbon dioxide emissions from our nation's energy sector — but this executive order threatens to stop that progress in its tracks.
Although the bill, sponsored by a motley assemblage of labor unions and electric utilities and a bipartisan group of senators led by Jeff Bingaman (D - NM) and Arlen Specter (R - PA), would effectively set
mandatory limits on carbon dioxide emissions beginning in 2012 through a cap - and - trade system, it comes with a huge caveat: a «safety valve.»
Under RGGI (pronounced reggie), as the trading system is known, states
set limits on carbon dioxide emissions and require power companies to buy credits or allowances to pay for the emissions they produce.
Despite early knowledge about climate change, electric utilities have continued to invest heavily in fossil fuel power generation over the past half a century, and since 1988 some have engaged in ongoing efforts to sow doubt about climate science and block legal
limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants.
It also lends support to the US Environmental Protection Agency, which last week proposed
a limit on carbon dioxide emissions from new coal - fired and gas - fired power plants.
The two, Senators John McCain, Republican of Arizona, and Joseph I. Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, said the United States should set
limits on carbon dioxide emissions, much like those Mr. Bush rejected.
That bill contains a limited version of cap and trade, a system of setting
a limit on carbon dioxide emissions while allowing companies to buy and sell permits to meet it.
RGGI sets
a limit on carbon dioxide emissions from the electric sector and raises money for renewables and efficiency by charging polluting generators for each ton of carbon dioxide they emit.