Sentences with phrase «limit on detention»

«Almost every informed commentator accepts that fundamental to the reforms required is the introduction of a statutory 28 - day time - limit on detention.

Experts warn that detention centres significantly worsen mental health conditions because there is no time limit on detention.

Theresa May announces time limit on detention pregnant women, the fight for wider reform will continue #SetHerFree https://t.co/IAu4Oxp8Ae

The Conservatives have now suggested they could support proposals to increase the 28 day limit on detention without charge.

Labour first suggested it would back the campaign for a time limit on detention last month but the party's immigration initiative today — which otherwise is full of «tough on immigration» policies — confirms how the party will approach the issue.

It was the Home Office, which presides over this system and refuses to even allow a maximum time limit on detention.

«The UK is an outlier in not having a time limit on detention.

Not exact matches

Detentions and arrests have not been limited to mainstream media, with several people in the last week having detention or arrest warrants issued against them on charges of insulting the president or praising the coup on social media, according to Anadolu.

Miranda's lawyers today secured a limited injunction preventing authorities accessing the files on hard drives they took from him after his nine - hour detention.

The Conservatives claim no data is available on how long terror suspects have been held since the new detention limit was introduced in July.

In the interim, I can announce that the Government will not be seeking to extend the order allowing the maximum 28 - day limit and, accordingly, the current order will lapse on 25 January and the maximum limit of pre-charge detention will, from that time, revert to 14 days.

[18] The announcement came a day after the narrow passing of a parliamentary vote on the Counter-Terrorism Bill, which would extend the limit on the period of detention of terror suspects without charge in England and Wales, from 28 to 42 days.

On immigration, there isn't even much to admire, outside of a commitment for a time limit to detention.

Democratic lawmakers are backing bills that would block the use of state and local facilities for enforcing federal immigration policies and limit the detention of individuals based on immigration - related issues.

Mr Brown said he would continue his strong stance on «sometimes quite controversial issues» like the 42 - day limit pre-charge detention for terror suspects or public sector pay.

Nick Hardwick calls for limit on administrative detention after unannounced inspection uncovers failures at Yarl's Wood women's centre

Hardwick said the findings of the April inspection, the first undertaken since June 2013, provided support to calls to place time limits on «administrative detention», or detention without trial.

• New limits on the amount of time youth can be kept in juvenile detention or secure confinement; and

The plaintiffs rely heavily on the Supreme Court's decision in Zadvydas v. Davis (2001), which interpreted federal statutes to limit detention pending removal to a reasonable period of time.

Whether it is standing up against the Administration's unlawful ban on Muslim travelers, challenging the Department of Justice's effort to halt NWIRP from doing important limited representation work for people at the detention center, or protecting the rights of undocumented immigrant youth, NWIRP provides a critical voice for those marginalized by federal policies.

But, he says, «What they don't seem to be seriously considering are firm limits on the duration of detention.

During parliamentary scrutiny of the recent Immigration Act 2016 (which received Royal Assent on 12 May 2016) amendments were proposed by the House of Lords to limit immigration detention to 28 days — it should be noted that this would not have covered J.N.'s situation as it was not applicable in the event that the Secretary of State had made a deportation order — see para. 84 here).

The suspension decision potentially limits the right of Sri Lankan and Afghan nationals to equality before the law including equal treatment before tribunals and other organs administering justice (protected under article 5 of ICERD), and the right to freedom from arbitrary detention (protected under article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights).