Letter to the Minister of Labour, with submission to the Board, highlights concerns over the downside risk waiver, complexity of forms, and proposal to
limit oral hearings.
Details concerns with
limiting oral hearings and downside risk.
Not exact matches
The time available for these
hearings is
limited so contact the People's Inquiry if you wish to attend or submit
oral evidence to the panel.
The U.S. Supreme Court just
heard oral arguments in the case of Janus v. AFSCME, which could substantially
limit public - sector union membership and financial support.
On September 27th, 10 judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will
hear oral argument on challenges to EPA's landmark
limits on the harmful carbon pollution from the nation's fossil fuel - burning power plants.
Group questions why speeding up the system requires
limiting their rights to
oral hearings, why modernization requires complicating the current process, and why has the downside risk form been added?
And third, the NEB's procedures in this case were inadequate to constitute deep accommodation: the NEB did not provide an
oral hearing, there was no funding available to the community and only «
limited opportunities for participation».
The nine months» time -
limit also puts pressure on the parties and their counsel to engage in efficient case management, particularly if two rounds of written pleadings are to be exchanged, full document production exercise is to be undertaken and one or two weeks» of
oral hearing is to be conducted followed by the exchange of written post-
hearing briefs.
Concerns have been voiced that the current wording could open the door to unsuccessful parties claiming they weren't given an equal opportunity to present evidence as a result of limitations on document disclosure or discovery, time
limits at an
oral hearing, or other procedural decisions.
(iv) if the application is refused, the claimant should renew at an
oral hearing; that
hearing should be
limited to an hour and the claimant will face a liability for costs if its application is unsuccessful.
There is no need for
hearings or
oral submissions — the adjudicator would take
limited written submissions and interpret the clause based on those submissions.
Argued in written brief and
oral argument multiple pre-motions arising in major crime cases including but not
limited to Rule 404B motions, Motions in Limine, Motion to Dismiss Indictments, Wade
Hearings, Miranda
Hearings and Motions to Suppress Evidence.
One participant used cued speech and the rest were
limited to
oral or auditory — verbal approach even though
hearing aid benefit was not evident.