Sentences with phrase «limit quality public school»

I was surprised and disappointed to hear that the council that represents my city took such a politicized and senseless step to limit quality public school options for families.

Not exact matches

«While offering free college tuition to low - income families is laudable, the reality is that many students» paths to college are limited because their local K - 12 public schools lack the resources to support them,» said Jasmine Gripper, Legislative and Policy Director of the Alliance for Quality Education in a statement.

As charter schools across the country struggle to keep up with demand, a new federal tax incentive could hold the key to spurring billions of dollars in investment in low - income areas with limited access to quality public charter school options.

Yet, there are still millions of children with limited access to a high quality public charter school.

A clear vision: inclusivity and quality If our vision of a musical school is limited to spotting, attracting and encouraging a few high achievers for public occasions, then music will never be «at the heart of the school».

A new federal tax incentive could hold the key to spurring billions of dollars in investment in low - income areas with limited access to quality public charter school options.

It's time for the state's leaders to justify to Connecticut parents why our education system limits the size and expansion of quality public schools, while thousands of students languish on waitlists with no access to an adequate education.

Academic Standards (PDF) Academic and Career Plan (PDF) ADA 504 Notice (PDF) Asbestos Management Plan (PDF) Assessment Information (PDF) ATOD (PDF) Attendance Policy (PDF) Bullying (PDF) Child Nutrition (PDF) Directory and Yearbook Information (PDF) District Wellness Policy (PDF) Education for Employment — Career Counseling (PDF) Education Options Available to Resident Children (PDF) Homeless Education Program (PDF) Human Growth and Development (webpage) Indoor Air Quality (PDF) Limited English Proficiency (PDF) Meal Charge Policy (PDF) Participation (PDF) Public Use of School Facilities (PDF) Possession or Use of Cell Phones (PDF) Program and Curriculum Modifications — Programs for Children At Risk (PDF) School Accountability Report (webpage) Special Education (PDF) Special Needs Scholarship Program (PDF) Student Locker Searches (PDF) Student Non-Discrimination and Complaint Procedures (PDF) Student Records (PDF) Suicide Prevention Resources (PDF) Student Privacy — Pupil Records (PDF) Student Privacy — Directory and Yearbook Information (PDF) Title I Family Engagement Policy (PDF) Title I Professional Qualifications — Teacher (PDF) Title I Professional Qualifications — Teacher Assistant Youth Options Courses (PDF)

From centrist Democrats who think that choice should only be limited to the expansion of public charter schools (and their senseless opposition to school vouchers, which, provide money to parochial and private schools, which, like charters, are privately - operated), to the libertarian Cato Institute's pursuit of ideological purity through its bashing of charters and vouchers in favor of the voucher - like tax credit plans (which explains the irrelevance of the think tank's education team on education matters outside of higher ed), reformers sometimes seem more - focused on their own preferred version of choice instead of on the more - important goal of expanding opportunities for families to provide our children with high - quality teaching and comprehensive college - preparatory curricula.

Revenue limits should be appropriate to address the increasing resources required for higher needs populations, rural schools, and cost of operating a high quality public school.

In order to meet this parental demand for choice and the public's desire for more high quality public educational options for families, three key things must be addressed in California: the funding inequity which results in charter school students being funded at lower levels than their traditional public school counterparts, the lack of equitable facilities for charter school students, and restrictive and hostile authorizing environments such as LAUSD Board Member Steve Zimmer's recent resolution limiting parent choice.

Rather than bowing to special interests that seek to roll back or limit access to educational choice, Arizona policymakers should support policies that create more quality public school options.

That's why a group of Connecticut parents and students filed the case Martinez v. Malloy — to ask a simple question: why does the state intentionally limit the size and expansion of quality public schools?

Unfortunately, every day millions of children in the United States attend dilapidated public schools with overcrowded classrooms, outdated textbooks and materials, harsh discipline policies and limited access to quality teaching and wraparound supports like school nurses, college counselors and afterschool programs.

Unfortunately, state anti-opportunity laws have limited the opening of new public schools and capped enrollment at existing quality public schools, disproportionately impacting the state's urban centers.

This case calls on state's leaders to justify to Connecticut parents why our education system limits the size and expansion of quality public schools, while thousands of students languish on waitlists with no access to an adequate education.

The State's decision not to provide charter schools with facilities funding, and decision to fund charter school students in a manner that results in these students receiving as little as half the support that traditional public school students receive, serves no purpose but to limit the ability of charter schools to provide students with the high quality educational opportunities that these children deserve and these schools were designed to offer.

According to the articles «Integrated Schools: Finding a New Path» (Gary Orfield, Erica Frankenberg, and Genevieve Siegel - Hawley, p. 22) and «Overcoming Triple Segregation» (by Patricia Gándara, p. 60), segregation by ethnic background of public schools in the United States is on the upswing, a reality which limits minority students» prospects for a high - quality education and all students» prospects for learning to work and interact with students from varied cuSchools: Finding a New Path» (Gary Orfield, Erica Frankenberg, and Genevieve Siegel - Hawley, p. 22) and «Overcoming Triple Segregation» (by Patricia Gándara, p. 60), segregation by ethnic background of public schools in the United States is on the upswing, a reality which limits minority students» prospects for a high - quality education and all students» prospects for learning to work and interact with students from varied cuschools in the United States is on the upswing, a reality which limits minority students» prospects for a high - quality education and all students» prospects for learning to work and interact with students from varied cultures.