Philip Davies went further, describing Mr Straw's statement as a «filibuster» designed to
limit time for debate.
«
Limited time for debate and the lack of a new impact assessment, following the Future Forum report, means that MPs are being asked to judge the bill in rapid time and without the full facts at their disposal,» he said.
If Ministers now move to defeat amendments made with near - consensus across the major parties» back benches, in the face of coalition tensions, this could be seen as a move designed to occupy the likely
limited time for debate with issues already well - dissected.
Not exact matches
«Can I say to Australians the
debate that they are hearing about a carbon tax is a
debate about what Tony Abbott calls a carbon tax, which [it] will be
for a
limited period of
time and then we will move to an emissions trading scheme.»
Unlike the government, individual MPs aren't able to pass guillotine motions which
limit the amount of
time each amendment gets
debated for.
With only 22 days left of legislative session, the
time for debate appears to be severely
limited.
He says Theresa May's opening speech took up an hour and a half of the
limited time set aside
for debate.
The programme motion is basically the programme
for the further consideration of the bill — the
time limit for further
debates on the bill.
Part of the reason
for the lack of
time was the two ministerial statements given by Gordon Brown and Jack Straw, which led to claims from some Tory MPs that the government was deliberately trying to
limit debate on the controversial coroners bill.
Normally around 3 - 5 minutes - the speaking
time limits for each
debate are published in the Agenda ahead of Conference.
But the
debate continues with the pro-choice groups still calling
for the changes sought by the 2008 amendments and the pro-life groups still seeking a reduction in the abortion
time limit.
In the
debate John Bercow, the Speaker, has just said he is reducing the
time limit for backbench speeches from five minutes to four minutes.
The ability to keep human embryos developing in the lab
for almost 2 weeks — achieved
for the first
time this year — should provide new insights into very early human development, and generate
debate on whether ethical
limits on studying embryos in culture should be extended.
At the same
time that the board was
debating the policy, wrangling over credentialing rules
for teachers of
limited - English - proficient students was pointing up sharp divisions on the issue among California teachers.
But even as I push
for an energy quest that
limits climate risk, I'm not worried about the resilience of Arctic ecosystems and not worried about the system tipping into an irreversibly slushy state on
time scales relevant to today's policy
debates.
Over months of contentious
debate, while the Waxman - Markey bill and subsequent Senate action were being considered, millions of Americans were introduced
for the first
time to the phrase «cap and trade,» a regulatory approach that first came to prominence in the 1990s as the centerpiece of a national program to address the threat of acid rain by
limiting emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), primarily from electric power plants.
For example, the question may be more revealing in a setting such as the first
debate and useful than in the upcoming town - meeting format which is probably going to draw out
time -
limited pre-canned answers.
Alex, this is only a
debate because of the very
limited data available
for the
time.