When the fossil fuel sources of these environmental impacts are made to pay the true cost of the pollution created, through mandated updated technological fixes such as improved and more efficient pollution control,
limited coal sources, and other mediation devices, the true cost of coal will make other energy sources more viable.
Not exact matches
The New
Source Performance Standards, which tightened emissions
limits on
coal - burning power plants, were enacted in 1979.
In fact, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, 72 percent of all toxic water pollution in the country comes from
coal - fired power plants, making
coal plants the number one
source of toxic water pollution in the U.S. (1) What's more, four out of five
coal plants in the U.S. have no
limits on the amount of toxics they are allowed to dump into our water.
On the climate front, discussions of ways to
limit global warming seem more focused on capturing stray emissions of methane (more on that anon) than on pressing for ways to promote it as an alternative to
coal, at least as a bridge to even less - polluting energy
sources.
Some good news from this research: Nationally, 77 % of citizens support funding research into renewable energy
sources, 74 % support regulating CO2 as a pollutant, and 63 % support strict
limits on existing
coal - fired power plants.
The Plan puts the first - ever
limits on the nation's biggest
source of carbon pollution — some 1,500
coal - and gas - fired power plants that together emit nearly two billion tons per year of carbon dioxide.
Chris V. attempted to refute it @ 22:40, but his answer was much too provincial,
limiting the discussion to only the U.S.. It's a big world out there, and he may be unaware that China is currently building an average of two new
coal fired power plants every week, and plans to continue building at this pace until at least 2024 [
source: the Economist].
At stake are
limits on the nation's biggest single
source of dangerous carbon pollution — some 1500
coal and gas fired power plants that together emit nearly two billion tons per year of carbon dioxide.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued the first - ever
limits on heat - trapping pollution from new power plants in March, ignoring protests from the energy industry and Republicans who fear regulation will raise electricity prices and kill off
coal as an energy
source.
EPA - mandated emission
limits on conventional
sources of electricity, especially
coal - fired power plants, are so restrictive that current technology can not meet their demands.
Together with a final rule setting standards for new power plants, EPA will create the first nationwide
limits on carbon emissions from
coal and and natural gas power plants, the largest
source of emissions in the US economy.
The impact category has
limited application on its own because it does not differentiate between energy
sources (e.g. oil or
coal).
If the propaganda and articles generated by the industry are any indication there is serious concern by fossil fuel users over any attempts to impose
limits on mercury emissions from
coal burning
sources.
However, the failure of the United States to control its largest
source of greenhouse gas emissions —
coal - fired power plants — is a prime excuse used by China and other developing countries for not
limiting their own emissions more strictly.
So if you get in the business of
limiting CO2 emissions, of taxing CO2 emissions, of creating a value in CO2 emissions where people trade them in this emissions trading scheme, you go to the
coal plants first because of the fact that that's the greatest
source — single
source — of CO2 that there is.»
If
coal usage is never constrained by environmental policy nor
limited by emergence of less expensive energy
sources, the resulting climate disruption can be expected to reach catastrophic levels.