The technology is a gentle reminder of how
limited human senses are at interpreting the characteristics of the nature of reality in the Universe.
Not exact matches
The NTSB also recommended that manufacturers should
limit (and NHTSA should verify that they have
limited) the use of automated driving systems to appropriate circumstances, and develop systems to more effectively
sense a
human driver's level of engagement and alert the driver when automated driving systems are in use and the driver is inattentive.
It should
limit Autopilot's operation only to those conditions, and have a far more effective system to
sense, verify, and safely react when the
human driver's level of engagement in the driving task is insufficient or when the driver fails to react to warnings.
I believe that
human actors who fail to give pride of place to moral boundaries that must never be crossed, such as the direct killing of the innocent, and who instead are ready to see their obligations in terms of moving beyond them in favor of «good results,» will be harder put «to take seriously the role that divine authority plays in morality»; for they will to that extent lose a
sense of the moral
limits that remind us of our finitude and anticipate consideration of a law of our being that is not one of our making.
What sets Lutherans apart is the
sense of the impassable
limits of
human existence, a metaphysical reservation that the restless modern temper contradicts at every turn.
Writes Dark, «It is only when we're blessed by a feeling of finitude that we can begin to perceive the holy, that
sense of a whole before which our
limited understanding is dwarfed... Only a twisted, unimaginative mind - set resists awe in favor of self - satisfied certainty... More humility might characterize our talk of God if we believe that the whole truth can never be entirely ours and that our attempts to nail God down are always well - intentioned
human constructs at best and idols at worst.»
I am aware that Article 19 of the UN's Declaration of
Human Rights refers to freedom of information in a more
limited sense, 2.
To begin with, because
human beings possess highly developed faculties of reason, language, and memory, a man's
sense of what is «his» is not
limited to himself, his family, or even those with whom he regularly interacts.
Hartshorne is not alone in this view Mary Anne Warren refers to a
human being in a moral
sense as «a full - fledged member of the moral community» whose traits include, but are not
limited to, consciousness and the ability to reason.
In addition to his
sense of the sacred, Camus's
sense of the
limits of
human reason and justice is worthy of serious attention for its incipient natural law approach combined with a sober prudence about how far even the best
human intentions can be trusted.
But this statement makes no
sense, unless there is some way of finding out within the
limits of
human fallibility that there are times when we do not make a mistake.
This trend achieves its fullest expression, so far as the New Testament is concerned, in the Fourth Gospel, where a divine being is represented as becoming
human, but without in any
sense ceasing to be divine, and is carried to its extreme
limits in the heretical teachings of the Docetists, who denied the reality of Jesus» humanity altogether.
First it requires us to find and describe what Tillich called the «boundary situations,» that is, those points where modern men and women reach the
limits of their
human existence, where they
sense they are alienated from society and other people, or feel a lack of personal meaning, or fear being useless and having no worth.2.
One can dispute with a man, dispute to the furthest
limit, as long as one assumes, that in the end there is a point in common, an agreement in some universal
human sense: in self - respect.
Perhaps the pivotal point of relation between higher learning and religion lies somewhere between the deepest
human sense of the
limits of our knowing and the cultivation, in the midst of such chastening wisdom, of the spiritual virtue of hope.
The moral standard of
human security tends to receive a
limited interpretation in the individualistic legal and biological
sense.
I do indeed stand on the distinction between a priori (or metaphysical) and empirical in the
sense given this distinction by Popper, except that, whereas Popper defines empirical as «conceivably falsifiable by observation» and apparently
limits observation to certain forms of
human perception, I sometimes include divine perception (in Whitehead's language, God's physical prehensions).
In some respects it did worse than ignore, actually celebrating
human exploitation of nature with no
sense of
limits.
There is but a short time between birth and death, and from the very
limited nature of my particular historical and social context I can discover, like every
human being, a
sense of the ultimate worth of it all.
First, it requires exploring with people what theologian Paul Tillich called the «boundary situations,» those points at which modern men and women reach the
limits of their
human existence, where they
sense a lack of personal meaning, or fear being useless and worthless.
We need a renewed
sense of the mystery of the
human person and the
limits to our own efforts at shaping and transforming character.
-LRB-...) transhumanism suffers from a Nietzschean utopianism that lacks common
sense, because it ignores the ways in which the technologies for altering
human traits are
limited in both their technical means and their moral ends.
Calling the study «fantastic,» psychologist Lisa Feigenson of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, says that because there is such a «drastic» difference in number
sense between the Pirahã and most other
human groups, it must be their language that
limits their conceptual abilities.
The character, who has been around since the»60s, initially possessed superhuman strength, endurance, stamina, flight, physical durability, a
limited precognitive «sixth
sense», and a perfectly amalgamated
human / Kree physiology that rendered her resistant to most toxins and poisons, with the added effect of making her body virtually invulnerable and indestructible.
Although there has been a
limited number of research done, the idea that female dogs who have had puppies will actively try to teach a
human baby how to behave like a dog and in that
sense will nip lightly at the nape of the neck or hands and feet if they do something that is considered «bad behavior».
You probably already know that animals can assess situations in the blink of an eye, while we —
human beings
limited by our primitive
senses — will take several minutes.
Visitors to this remarkable exhibition will develop a
sense of curiosity and agency, and cull meaning from systems and trends that lie at the
limits of
human comprehension.
Yet Stella's outsize gestures comport with a very
human sense of his
limits.
If there is a probability that humanity could soon be confronted with a huge challenge, one that takes its astounding shape from overconsumption, overproduction and overpopulation activities of the
human species, then would reason and common
sense not suggest that the
human community could move forward by
limiting increases in certain global activities, the ones now overspreading the surface of Earth.
My purpose has long been to help people make
sense of the momentous environmental and social changes under way on this «pale blue dot» called Earth, the forces behind those changes, and what policies and practices can foster
human progress while
limiting regrets.
But there's never been a greater chance, through collaboration and communication, to imbue our varied
human journeys with a shared
sense of priorities — including the importance of conserving Earth's biological bounty, spreading the gifts that come with access to information and safe sources of energy, and
limiting the scope of
human - driven climate change.
In that
sense, we need to
limit many
humans now so that
humans in the future (and really not so distant future) will not be
limited beyond any ability to live, or to live any marginally decent life.
I hope that while placing the Tunguska event into perpspective we also come to realize that our false
sense of security regarding impacts like this and worse is largely perceptual based on our
limited understanding of our own history and its woefully
human timescale, and I hope we realize that impacts might not be the rare events we've come to consider them as being, and that they may not arrive singularly and only on rare occasions, but as swarms of potentially devastating event producers, as our planet enters into regions of our Milky Way where clouds of potentially planet - disrupting objects are a genuine concern and are something we can and should do something about... and soon.
If per
human overconsumption of scarce resources; unbridled economic globalization overspreading the surface of our planetary home; and the skyrocketing increase of absolute global
human population numbers could be occurring synergistically in our time and could have something to do with the distinctly
human - driven predicament which looms ominously before humanity, does it make
sense to consider, just for a moment, what might to done to set
limits on these overgrown
human activities?
Today, the adherents of the mainstream religions typically use modern family planning to
limit their family size and accept that
limiting human numbers makes
sense.
I have some romanticized
sense that being
human involves not simply living within
limits but cherishing boundaries.
In Nova Scotia, MacLean explains, «
human rights legislation takes precedence in the
sense that it is not
limited by the application of any other act.»