This issue of
limited human thinking, and many others, is often what keeps us from acting in the earth's (and therefore our own) best interests.
Positivism
limits human thought to the arena of the given and hence is essentially conservative or reactionary.
Not exact matches
As I argue in a forthcoming paper in the Georgetown Law Journal, there are cases in which we should
think not in terms of the rights the corporation should enjoy, but in terms of the appropriate
limits to be placed on the corporation, understood as a tool for achieving
human objectives.
«I
think people's intuitions do just really break down when they're pushed to these
limits because we've never dealt with entities that are smarter than
humans on this planet.»
Further, I
think that even what you see as
limited human logic abilities are quite robust and testable.
And when you
think others are stupid to be «religious», how stupid are you to
limit yourself to this one planet, when there are billions up there, all connected by God's Galactic Internet, no big bang, no beginning, no end, forever, billions of souls traveling the ever - changing universe, in and out of various
human - like bodies, on and off of different earth - like planets.
Even though our images of totally committed, self - sacrificing, lifelong love are invariably
limited to our taste of that kind of love through our
human parents, they are still the best images we have and about the best we can manage in
thinking about God.
Cartesians — taking the theologically grounded refusal to believe in spirits or worry about the influence of final causes to some sort of plausible
limit — believed that «animals» were insentient, and that only
humans had goals or
thoughts or feelings.
In confining God's revelation to the written word, sola scriptura theology not only cut itself off from much of the rich trinitarian
thinking since Nicaea, but
limited revelation to the exigencies of
human salvation.
Human feelings, sensory perceptions,
thinking process, etc. are all highly
limited in range and flawed within its range.
God will not only absorb the effects of the
human misuse of power, but will «look bad» in the eyes of those who
think that God's possibilities should not be so
limited (see 1 Cor 1:26 - 31)(See Fretheim, The Suffering of God, 76).
Third, the context has shifted: in contrast to the traditional Catholic conception of the political community, and politics within such communities, as the means of achieving real if
limited justice for
human life in the world, and a corresponding theory of international relations, recent Catholic
thought on war often treats the state as a locus of injustice and the goals of particular states as inherently at odds with the achievement of common
human goals, while an internationalism defined in terms of the United Nations system is proposed as the best means to those common goals.
Being
human being we have a
limited knowledge, we experiences impossibilities due to of our
limited vision,
thinking and approach but there is nothing
limited or impossible for the CREATOR.
When all allowance has been made for these
limiting factors — the chances of oral transmission, the effect of translation, the interest of teachers in making the sayings «contemporary,» and simple
human fallibility — it remains that the first three gospels offer a body of sayings on the whole so consistent, so coherent, and withal so distinctive in manner, style content, that no reasonable critic should doubt, whatever reservations he may have about individual sayings, that we find reflected here the
thought of a single, unique teacher.
Theories proliferate before the rational conundrums of
human thought: is the universe
limited or unlimited in space and time?
This occurs when we
think of heaven as the place of salvation and when we ask what must we do to «get in,» or when we
think of heaven or salvation as requiring a way of life on earth that really
limits our happiness or natural desires or
human goals.
I would also expect humanly created definitions to use terminology
limited to
human thought and experience.
Since I left print journalism to study theology two decades ago, I've
thought a great deal about the
limits and possibilities of words - especially when we try to navigate the spiritual territory of
human life.
-- the question still remains: starting as we must with our
limited human experience, what is the road our
thoughts ought to travel out toward the truth about God?
If we
think at all about life's underlying reality, we have to
think in
limited human terms.
If one
thinks of the universal creative powers (or however he customarily considers God) as becoming concentrated within the
limits of a
human body, the assertion is pure nonsense.
From Lear's interpretation of Socratic irony, we learn that the proper response to the insuperable
limits of
human knowledge, to the perplexities arising in the midst of what we
thought we understood, is wonder.
In Catholic
thinking, just as the principle of private ownership is
limited by the common destiny of the goods of the earth, so legitimate claims to local self - determination must also be integrated into a wider commitment to the extended family of the whole
human race.
But the recognition that
human thought can not attain any certain knowledge can liberate one to
think freely and creatively over a wide range of questions that have often been taboo when one was supposed to
limit thinking to areas in which certainty is possible.
I
think I have been struggling for years to reach beyond the
limits of my
limited human understanding to find the Being (I AM) Who my spirit is certain lays beyond them.
Monad's were for Leibniz just as real on the subhuman, even subanimal, levels, as on the
human level; they were merely much less capable of
thought and definite conscious recollections and perceptions, more
limited to simple feeling and extremely short - run memory of what has just happened.
It is letting go of these ego /
human /
limiting thoughts that we can experience God and commune with the Angels and Masters.
Even though legitimate sexual activity can not be
limited to marriage, Russell
thinks that under certain conditions marriage can be the «best and most important relation that can exist between two
human beings» (p. 143).
The evolution I love the most is the evolution of
human thought to better understand these things that have been provided to us, so we can live better lives... and all true believers feel the same, though they are often
limited by their own experiences in various ways — culture, education, social groups, life experiences.
Scientific, philosophical, and religious
thoughts, are all flawed with our
limited human perceptions based on our own
human experiences and the evolution of those
thoughts over time.
As for who created God, do you really
think the very
limited human mind can really begin to comprehend the nature of one who would have to be by nature unlimited?
Confirmation Bias... «Explanations for the observed biases include wishful
thinking and the
limited human capacity to process information.»
Her doctor was shocked but said that since
humans are still evolving her early development may be more normal than we
think research is only
limited to certain group studies.She just turned 6 months on 7/25/14 and she is now completely pulling herself up on furniture and has taken her first few steps without support.
«Our new study shows that the pattern is a lot simpler than we first
thought —
human evolution was much more
limited,» Dr Evans said.
I
think it continues to be a great challenge for Florida, because Florida has nothing in its loss or zoning or planning mechanisms that call for the state to
limit the
human population load in South Florida.
The study didn't test
humans and dogs head to head — I
think the dogs might win depending on the odor — but what it shows is the
limits of
human smell tracking haven't really been investigated.
The book is a heady ride through a cherry - picked crop of impressive discoveries in science and medicine, all of them made when the
human body was pushed to what we now
think of as its
limits.
Society's failure to embrace the idea of neurodiversity and accept people who
think differently might be
limiting human potential, says a new book
Researchers
thought culturally transmitted behavior was
limited to
humans and chimpanzees, but the new study suggests that all great apes share a common ancestor that was multicultural.
Although scientists previously
thought that grieving behavior was
limited to chimps and
humans, researchers have now observed the behavior in several other monkey species, as well as elephants, dogs, cats, and even crows.
Unlike embryonic stem cells, which are developmental blank slates that can generate virtually all types of cells found in adult
humans, adult stem cells are
thought to possess
limited potential to transform into cells found in their tissues of origin.
Limited data are available about the ecology of SARS - CoV, but bats are
thought to be the animal reservoir for the virus which may be transmitted to small mammals with exposure to these small animals as the source of
human infections [10].
«I don't
think that the kind of approach the authors took gives evidence for a
limit to
human lifespan.»
Have you ever stopped to
think that there might be an upper -
limit to
human metabolism?
Dating is a stage of romantic relationships in
humans whereby two people meet socially with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability as a The world is divided into two groups of people: those who
think it's OK to date a friend's ex and those who believe it's completely off -
limits.
A young male zombie spends his days roaming the barren and devastated wasteland that is America with
limited thoughts and actions, only able to remember that his name while he was
human began with the letter «R» and only yearning to eat the brains of the few remaining living
humans just so he can connect and learn to feel alive again.
Just as importantly, conservatives fail to realize that reliance on tradition can often be as senseless as technocratic
thinking because it is based on
limited human reasoning.
On balance, I
think I prefer our system, where there's always a speed
limit but enforcement is typically relegated to an actual
human being.
Or does part of the responsibility lie with the people who exploit
human beings»
limited impulse control and general inability to make sensible choices, whether by saturation advertising aimed at showing how their establishment offers a bunch of drunk people unlimited bread sticks and bottomless cheesecakes for a special low price or lulling them into
thinking too large and too thirsty vehicles transform their sedentary fat selves into adventure - loving action figures?
Mankind is a long way from developing a computer to
think like a
human, given the reality, computers have a
limited role in making decisions in price action trading.