Sentences with phrase «limited liability companies controlled»

Like other wealthy campaign donors, Mr. Litwin circumvented contribution limits by funneling many smaller gifts through dozens of limited liability companies he controlled.

On Sept. 7, 2012, five limited liability companies controlled by Glenwood sent checks in those exact amounts to that party committee.

Capital subsequently revealed that at least five limited liability companies controlled by Litwin's Glenwood Management are currently retaining the firm, Goldberg & Iryami — which Silver worked for quietly, in addition to being of counsel for another firm, Weitz & Luxenberg — for challenges to their real property tax assessments.

During the last election cycle, limited liability companies controlled by the company and its founder, Leonard Litwin, gave $ 3.6 million to state - level candidates and parties, more than any other donor and an amount equal to 1.4 percent of all the money contributed to these committees.

Litwin has used 27 different Limited Liability Companies controlled by Glenwood Management to contribute at least $ 4.3 million to political committees in New York since the beginning of 2013.

Litwin, 100, donated at least $ 4.3 million to political committees through 27 different limited liability companies controlled by Glenwood Management since 2013, according to Capital New York.

As first reported by Capital, two limited liability companies controlled by Glenwood gave Patterson $ 2,500 each.

The quirk in election law emerged from a 1996 state Board of Elections ruling that determined that each limited liability company controlled by a developer should be treated as if it were an individual under election law.

Close the «LLC» Loophole, which allows an individual to make an essentially unlimited number of political contributions via the Limited Liability Companies they control — a common tactic of real estate moguls.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

«Limited liability means you can't be financially responsible for more than your investment in the company,» writes Greg McFarlane in his book, Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense.

The New York Fed will take, through a limited liability company formed for this purpose, control of a portfolio of assets valued at $ 30 billion as of March 14, 2008.

Many self - directed IRA owners create a limited liability company (LLC) that is controlled by the IRA.

The Skelos complaint shows how the multiple Limited Liability Companies, or LLCs, controlled by Glenwood can be used to coordinate and bundle hundreds of thousands of dollars of campaign contributions in order to buy favorable policy outcomes and tax breaks.

Corporations Use Limited Liability Companies to Skirt Campaign Contribution Limits Limited Liability Companies associated with luxury real estate mogul Leonard Litwin have channeled more than $ 900,000 into races for the New York State Senate this election cycle, largely to Republicans seeking to hold on to majority control.

An anonymous limited - liability company backed by wealthy homeowners who take helicopters to and from East Hampton has contributed half of all money raised by Republicans in their bid to gain control of Town Hall.

Sugarman's lawsuit states that a developer named Kevin Maloney controls two limited liability companies, Carroll Street Holdings LLC and Nevins Street Holding, which share the same New York City address.

Sugarman's lawsuit challenges the idea that donations to Patterson's campaign made though various limited liability companies allegedly controlled by the same person count separately under donations limits.

The loophole that allows those controlling Limited Liability Companies to donate essentially unlimited amounts of campaign contributions is an example of the loophole that swallows the law.

During that call, Silver claimed «that there was no issue with him getting the fees because he «only represented the (limited liability companies)»» controlled by Glenwood, the filing states.

Methodological note: Totals for limited liability companies and other corporate holdings were generally added to the totals for businesses that control them.

But two PACs controlled by New York City landlords have accepted eight checks from the company and its limited liability companies in recent months.

Even if the enforcement counsel wins this case and the definition of «alter egos» is limited to incorporated entities controlled exclusively by only one person, it could apparently reduce the amount of money that hundreds of donors — particularly limited liability companies — would be allowed to give.

The funds were funneled through a Howe - controlled limited liability company as checks made out to Percoco's wife.

The Assembly has passed some campaign finance reform measures, including closing the so - called Limited Liability Company (LLC) loophole, which allows those controlling these secretive business entities to essentially ignore campaign contribution limits.

Except as provided in subdivision (2a) of this section, «control» means the power to vote more than twenty percent (20 %) of outstanding voting shares or other interests of a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or trust.