Sentences with phrase «limited role in the decision»

Godric Smith, the civil servant who gave evidence to the Hutton inquiry about his limited role in the decision to «out» the late Dr David Kelly as a suspected leaker, has been trying to leave Downing Street for much of the year.

The PBC would have a limited role in decision - making, instead focusing on communicating between the native title group and third parties.

Not exact matches

The Harper government has dismantled one of the world's top aquatic and fishery libraries as part of its agenda to reduce government as well as limit the role of environmental science in policy decision - making.

Whitehead holds that the decisions of the past occasions inescapably play a causally efficacious role in setting the limits of the present occasion.

Michael Corrigon and Simon Ellis at Clayton Utz provide some thoughts on the ACCC's new role in merger authorisation and discuss media mergers by reference to the New Zealand High Court's decision in NZME Limited v Fairfax Media Limited [2017] NSHC 3186 (recently appealed) and Australia's new Media Merger Guidelines.

He made one poor decision for a pass that led to a Swiss break and in the deep role he was forced to be much more reserved and limit his penetrating runs but......

why did we play Welbeck in the striker's role... no one can question his heart but to have a player with such limited first - touch and finishing skills against such a game opponent with Lacazette on the bench is almost unforgivable... maybe it's because Welbeck tows the party line or maybe it's because Welbeck doesn't know anything but 100 % on the pitch, unfortunately neither of these qualities makes him a capable starting striker on a team with any real aspirations... I can only hope that he was being showcased for a move elsewhere, as there was some talk last week about some interest from Everton... if he moved on that would be the only silver lining of this coach's decision, but once again it wouldn't excuse this club for putting business decisions ahead of fielding the best possible team to secure 3 points at Anfield

The technology and analytical methods that Michael has developed for this are going to play a key role in policy decisions and allocation of what is an expensive and limited resource,» says Galvagno.

This 2 - hour intensive simulation puts teams of participants in the role of c - level executives who have to react to a stressful scenario where critical decisions must be made every ten minutes based on a limited amount of information revealed to each player over the course of the experience.

Because the outfit, like so many Beltway - oriented reformers, is clinging to a limited notion of the role families should play in education decision - making at a time when parents are demanding to be lead decisionmakers in how schools and operators serve their children.

Mankind is a long way from developing a computer to think like a human, given the reality, computers have a limited role in making decisions in price action trading.

Acting Director Mick Mulvaney's decision to close the Office of Students and Young Consumers is a direct attack on every American who enrolls in higher education... The role of the Office of Students and Young Consumers is not limited to protecting student loan borrowers.

Bogle was right when he said that the focus should be on the long term and that investors should be trying to limit the role that emotion plays in their investing decisions and that we should all make an effort to remain humble re how much we really know about how the market works.

A ball hit off of the outfield wall will bounce off and come back at you exactly how you thought it would, so playing the angles and making sound decisions in the outfield about when to go for the spectacular catch and when to limit the damage by only surrendering a single will play a big role in your level of success.

The mission of the Young Voices for the Planet film series is to limit the magnitude of climate change and its impacts by empowering children and youth, through uplifting and inspiring success stories, to take an essential role in informing their communities — and society at large, challenging decision - makers, and catalyzing change.

The Judge concluded the case by pointing out that the dispute demonstrated the range of possible outcomes when parties are calculating Close - Out Amounts, and the wisdom of ISDA making the changes that it did in the 2002 Agreement — NPC illustrated the type of outcome that a party given the role of decision maker and limited only by a requirement of rationality might press for, regardless of the fact of an actual replacement transaction.

The courts have delivered several decisions over the last few years that establish that they have a better understanding of the limited and supportive role they are expected to play in arbitral proceedings, taking a stand back from the largely interventionist role they once played.

In Virginia, a court may consider any of the following factors, among others, in making a decision: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; the age and physical and mental condition of each parent; the relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; the needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members; the role that each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatioIn Virginia, a court may consider any of the following factors, among others, in making a decision: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; the age and physical and mental condition of each parent; the relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; the needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members; the role that each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatioin making a decision: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; the age and physical and mental condition of each parent; the relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; the needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members; the role that each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatioin the future, in the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatioin the upbringing and care of the child; the propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child; the relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determinatioin and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child; the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference; any history of family abuse; and such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determination.

If the spouse has a new role, it's essential to clearly define (and potentially limit) the spouse's decision making powers in the company, in order to prevent future disputes.

The registrant argued that the independent legal counsel «s role in the preparation of the Committee's decision should have been limited to «simply proofreading or correcting typographical errors».

In the first decision, 2147191 Ontario Inc. v. Springdale Pizza Depot Ltd., the Ontario court determined that because a franchisor's extent of involvement in an assignment «went beyond a mere passive role limited to the specific requirements required for its consent under the franchise agreement,» the assignee was entitled to rescissioIn the first decision, 2147191 Ontario Inc. v. Springdale Pizza Depot Ltd., the Ontario court determined that because a franchisor's extent of involvement in an assignment «went beyond a mere passive role limited to the specific requirements required for its consent under the franchise agreement,» the assignee was entitled to rescissioin an assignment «went beyond a mere passive role limited to the specific requirements required for its consent under the franchise agreement,» the assignee was entitled to rescission.

The role of risk assessment in the regulation of health and safety in the workplace is a subject in its own right, but it should be noted that the decision of the Court of Appeal in Allison v London Underground Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 71, [2008] All ER (D) 185 (Feb) was a clarion call to the courts, and through them to employers, to recognise the significant increase in employer responsibility that the obligation to risk assess has created.

At first the role of the trusted custodian (trusted because s / he can not have a stake in the content of the documents) is limited as the decisions outlined above belong to the creator.

Therefore the importance of «appearance» in bias will be much more limited and, given the role of councillors, «clear pointers» will be required if a predisposed state of mind is to be held to be closed or apparently closed at the time of decision.