GOP policy makers traditionally favor school choice and
limiting the role of federal government in schools.
But while some of the nation's most prominent education lobby groups are backing the bill, there is apprehension from others that lawmakers might have overreacted to political pressure to
limit the role of the federal government — considerably weakening Washington's ability to step in if a state fails to address its most troubled schools.
I support
a limited role of the federal government in education to facilitate the education of students who are significantly more expensive to educate, such as disabled students, English language learners, and students from very disadvantaged backgrounds.
Not exact matches
In general, those who follow an originalist philosophy
of legal interpretation tend to view the legal
role of the
federal government in a more
limited manner than those who do not.
Let me once again state that the
role of the CBN as banker to the
Federal Government is to do exactly what we have done and within the
limits specified by law.
For six years, the Obama administration, breaking with generations
of practice, gave every indication that it saw few
limits to the
role of the
federal government in primary and secondary schooling.
Yet, at the same time, Republicans in Washington are embracing the worst elements
of the teachers unions» national education agenda, by insisting that the
federal government should have a
limited, possibly nonexistent,
role in school policy.
In the principles, the groups highlight the important and historic
role the
federal government has played during the 50 years since the ESEA was originally passed in promoting educational opportunity and protecting the rights and interests
of students disadvantaged by discrimination, poverty, and other conditions that may
limit their educational attainment.
«As a result, we are pleased to see that the latest version
of the bill recognizes that the
federal government's
role is
limited in this arena.»
Re: the US News article on top about ESSA: Chairwoman Foxx is right about the
role of the
federal government in America's K - 12 education system; and families can continue to pressure educrats like Mr Botel by opting out, wherever and whenever possible, from their local state schools until the
federal government gives up on the continuing mistake
of its annual testing requirement in two subjects only, which has produced no significant improvement in American education for 15 years now, but has cost us in lost opportunities, including time and energy that might have been devoted to non-tested subjects, including those in the broader curricula represented by the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme, which requires assessment — including but not
limited to external final exams — in six subjects distributed over at least five fields, an assessment approach that has been imitated by the world's leading educational jurisdictions, but is being discouraged by the ignorant Luddites in the the U.S. ED.
, Chairwoman
of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, to talk about the
federal government's
role in education and express her support for Foxx's efforts to ensure that its influence is
limited.
At the end
of 2015, Congress passed NCLB's successor, the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which
limits the
federal government's
role in shaping school accountability, and gives states considerably more discretion to craft their own plans.
DeVos»
limited understanding
of IDEA seems to presage a global ignorance
of the
role of the
federal government in ensuring accountability for special needs kids, as well as other traditionally - disenfranchised groups like low - income students, students
of color, and English - language learners.
In any case, those who do not divulge financial information to their members may be engaged in egregious behaviour but if one supports recognition
of self -
government, then, as I've said in earlier articles, the
role of the
federal government should be
limited to «a policy
of no - policy.»