Sentences with phrase «limiting dangerous global warming»

President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris climate agreement on Thursday could make it difficult, if not impossible, for the world to stay on track to reach an internationally agreed goal of limiting dangerous global warming, scientists said.

Analysts say an effective deal to limit dangerous global warming would slash demand for fossil fuels and the value of oil companies.

Not exact matches

Two new studies aim to quantify limits on the amount of greenhouse emissions necessary to avoid dangerous global warming

That's an incredibly aggressive goal but one some scientists say is the only way that the world can avert global warming of more than 2 °C — the European Union has determined that's a prudent limit to «avoid dangerous anthropogenic warming,» in the United Nations parlance.

«The Paris Climate Agreement aims to put the world on track to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to 1.5 oC.

Scientists consider that level of global warming dangerous, and the goal of the Paris Climate Agreement is to stop global warming before that limit is reached.

The Framework Convention [6] does not define a dangerous level for global warming or an emissions limit for fossil fuels.

For years now, I've been exploring whether words alone, without a calamitous kick from nature, can jog humanity to cut short its long love affair with fossil fuels for the sake of limiting the odds of dangerous global warming.

If environmental groups and their backers want to see concrete progress on limiting the risk that humans will propel dangerous global warming, they may need more than just additional money and better organization, but also a hard look at core strategies and a philosophy that has long cast climate change as primarily a conventional pollution problem, not a technology problem.

A central dispute was over how scientists can best discuss risks and responses related to inherent, and dangerous, extremes of climate in a world increasingly fixated on how to limit global warming caused by human activity.

Unlike Trump, Tillerson says he accepts the science of climate change, although he doesn't hold out much hope of limiting dangerous levels of global warming.

The Paris Agreement confirmed the commitment of global leaders to limit dangerous warming to below 2 °C but also promised to pursue an even stricter 1.5 °C target, adding more pressure for companies, investors and regulators to act.

By 2009, nearly every government in the world had endorsed the 2 °C limit — global warming beyond that level was widely considered «dangerous.»

The Paris accord confirmed the commitment of global leaders to limit dangerous warming to below 2 °C but also promised to pursue an even stricter 1.5 °C target, adding more pressure for companies, investors and regulators to act.

Halving our emissions is not good enough: we need to get down to zero to stay under the 2 C target that scientists and policy makers have identified as the limit beyond which global warming becomes dangerous.

As a result there is a huge gap between national commitments to reduce greenhouse gas (ghg) emissions that have been made thus far under the UNFCCC and global ghg emissions reductions that are necessary to limit warming to 2 oC, a warming limit that has been agreed to by the international community as necessary to prevent very dangerous climate change.

To fully understand the nature of the harm caused by this delay it is necessary to understand the policy implications of a «carbon budget» that must limit global emissions to avoid dangerous warming levels..

At the G - 7 summit over the weekend, President Trump refused on Saturday to recommit to the Paris agreement, while the six other leading industrialized nations reiterated their support for the accord, which sets out a global action plan to avoid dangerous climate change by limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius.

Although there is considerable scientific evidence that limiting warming to 1.5 degrees C is necessary to prevent very dangerous warming, a fact implicit in the recent Paris Agreement in which nations agreed to work to keep warming as close as possible from exceeding 1.5 degrees C additional warming, if the international community seeks to limit warming to 2 degrees C it must assure that global emissions do not exceed the number of tons of CO2 emissions that will raise atmospheric concentrations to levels that will cause warming of 2 degrees C.

Limiting emissions to one trillion tonnes means that global warming would most likely warming be limited to 2 degrees Celsius, the generally agreed - to level above which climate change would become dangerous.

First, physical risk: in order to avoid the most dangerous impacts of climate change, scientists have shown that we must limit global warming to 2C, a target now adopted unanimously by governments through the landmark Paris Agreement on climate.

Wasdell said that the draft submitted by scientists contained a metric projecting cumulative total anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, on the basis of which a «carbon budget» was estimated — the quantity of carbon that could be safely emitted without breaching the 2 degrees Celsius limit to avoid dangerous global warming.

The actual amount of emissions reductions that are needed between now and 2020 is somewhat of a moving target depending on the level of uncertainty that society is willing to accept that a dangerous warming limit will be exceeded, the most recent increases in ghg emissions rates, and assumptions about when global ghg emissions peak before beginning rapid reduction rates.

The Framework Convention [6] does not define a dangerous level for global warming or an emissions limit for fossil fuels.

Although a limited range of positive effects of global warming on humans have been identified, the overwhelming majority of effects are increasingly dangerous.

Indeed, the market conditions and policies necessary to make the tar sands a cost - effective source of energy will almost certainly result in dangerous levels of global warming that will exceed two degrees Celsius, the internationally agreed upon limit that will prevent climate change from destroying the planet.

[11] Recent estimates also suggest that at current emission rates the Earth could pass a threshold of 2 °C global warming, which the United Nations» IPCC designated as the upper limit to avoid «dangerous» global warming, by 2036.

Perhaps humanity would take that tack if we were trying to limit global warming — say, we had already passed the Paris Agreement's aspirational 1.5 degree warming threshold and were trying not to broach the more dangerous 2 degree mark — while at the same time working toward rapid decarbonization.

The limit of 2C of global warming agreed by the world's governments is a «dangerous target», «foolhardy» and will not avoid the most disastrous consequences of climate change, new research from a panel of eminent climate scientists warned on Tuesday.