Moomaw and Mihaela Papa, a postdoctoral research fellow at Harvard Law School, sent me a short piece proposing ways to invigorate the faltering climate treaty process by shifting the focus from confrontations over emissions to collaborative work encouraging access to modern energy choices while
limiting environmental harms.
Not exact matches
Before health officials are likely to consider
limiting environmental exposure to BMAA, however, they will need stronger proof of
harm.
The rules mark the first time the federal government has stepped in to enact protections to
limit risks posed by a technology that has been both criticized for causing
environmental harm and credited with making the nation one of the leading producers of oil and gas.
If there are in fact serious
environmental problems with fossil fuels it would be in the public interest to put resources into addressing these problems instead of wasting efforts and money on
limited inefficient and costly alternatives which only serve to
harm the economy and a failed economy can not properly look after the environment
This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not
limited to the «no
harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of
environmental harm to other states and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and many other legal theories including tort law.
This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not
limited to: (a) the «no
harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of
environmental harm to other states, and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, (b) the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, (c) human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and (d) many other legal theories including tort law.
SI reports too often focus on individual staff failings without considering the wider organisational and / or
environmental factors that enabled the error to occur,
limiting learning and the opportunity to prevent future
harm.