It's not only killing the economy, it's
limiting human freedom in the country, and it's unaccountable.»
The liberal approach is one that relies on the government's ability to
limit human freedom by just taking material goods and redistributing them.
Not exact matches
Section reports acknowledge that «the
limits to bureaucratic control have become clearly visible» and that
freedom is a universal
human impulse.
They have not located the dignity of
human beings in a self - modifying
freedom that knows no
limit and that need never respect a
limit which it can, in principle, transgress.
However, our discussion and defense of Plantinga has shown that, when worked out coherently, the classical theist must affirm a notion of omnipotence practically identical to that of the process theist — i.e., our discussion demonstrates that the classical theist must, like the process theist, acknowledge that
human freedom places necessary
limits upon God's power in both the moral and natural realms.
The religious objections have mostly aimed to protect God's sovereign
freedom to do what He pleases with his creation, a
freedom which, the dissenters argue, would be
limited by the existence of universal and unbreakable laws of nature, or indeed of inevitable laws of history or
human behaviour.
This
freedom means that all men are to be immune from coercion on the part of individuals or of social groups and of any
human power, in such wise that no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due
limits.»
But if we dispense with God - talk altogether, we may find that we have not achieved the
freedom of maturity at all, but rather lost it by confining our discourse to such
limits as no longer allow room for the
human spirit to breathe and move.
Human freedom rooted in God declares that all states and all political orders are under God,
limited not omnipotent.
The second sees
human beings as all
freedom — creatures who may seek to master even death, since it does not confront us with the
limit that is God.
Still, in the end, there is a
limit to what
human freedom can do.
but we should by this time be aware that the full bill of
human rights is a necessary accompaniment of the enjoyment of any
limited range of
freedom of information and ideas.
I am aware that Article 19 of the UN's Declaration of
Human Rights refers to
freedom of information in a more
limited sense, 2.
He showed that we can exercise
freedom not just by being in control but also by consenting to our
limits and surrendering to what is beyond
human control.
According to Christian beliefs, the sovereignty of God and the
human responsibility for stewardship
limit our
freedom to control life.
Granted that there are
limits to
human freedom, what of the person who can know, and feel, and do otherwise than he does?
But
freedom sets the
limit to all assurance that any particular
human problem will be solved.
Dr. May gives this as the definition of addiction: «Addiction is any compulsive, habitual behavior that
limits freedom of
human desire.
Even though Job himself recognizes God as «all - powerful» (42:2), God's «power is
limited by
human freedom... God's love, like all true love, operates in a world not of cause and effect but of
freedom and gratuitousness.»
The opening of the document clearly indicates that the demand for
human freedom in society expressed in part through constitutional
limits on government prompted the council fathers to return to the Catholic Church's treasury of sacred tradition.
And there is nothing controversial in the documents commitment to
freedom and democracy throughout the world, to peaceful cooperation in international relations, and to «the nonnegotiable demands of
human dignity; the rule of law;
limits on the absolute power of the state; free speech;
freedom of worship; equal justice; respect for women; religious and ethnic tolerance; and respect for private property.»
We as
humans all have our time -
limit on earth, but the 9 - 11 was symbolic that secular USA's crumbling and a new era for Muslims to gain
freedom and
human rights through her.
Freedom to feel the rich range of
human emotions, with no off -
limits categories labeled «unmasculine» is another gain.
But this
freedom for exploration should not blind the
human limits.
The
freedom of the
human mind... meddles with every question, and wanders over heaven and earth, except so far as the authority of the Divine Word, as a superincumbent weight, presses it down, and restrains it within
limits.
That is, he points out that although the God of process theism «could not create beings possessing the positive capacities of
human beings but lacking in libertarian
freedom,» the God of traditional theism, not being
limited by any metaphysical necessities, could have.
The African Commission on
Human and Peoples» Rights has made clear that the charter does not allow governments to «enact provisions which would
limit the exercise of this
freedom.»
«By asserting extraterritorial jurisdiction, the Drip bill could provide unintended justification for such actions by other governments, including those that seek to
limit freedom of expression and other
human rights online.
EPPC scholars, its Web page continues, «have consistently sought to defend and promote our nation's founding principles — respect for the inherent dignity of the
human person, individual
freedom and responsibility, justice, the rule of law, and
limited government.»
Guided by some internal compass as mysterious as
human creativity, Bob Rauschenberg took off on a rocket ride from utter innocence to the outer
limits of artistic
freedom.
Climate change threatens to erode
human freedoms and
limit choice.
«We have the
freedom needed to
limit and direct technology» (ibid., 112); «to devise intelligent ways of... developing and
limiting our power» (ibid., 78); and to put technology «at the service of another type of progress, one which is healthier, more
human, more social, more integral» (ibid., 112).
Notice also that
human vs rulers feeling is so strong in Canada that their government has passed a law to
limit freedom of speech on the subject.
Case law of the European Court of
Human Rights supposedly would endorse this view, because there is no support for the proposition that the «core area» of
freedom of religion must be
limited to private conscience and the
freedom to manifest one's religion in private or within the circle of those who share the faith, thus excluding the public manifestation of religion.
In Ford v. Quebec, Chief Justice Dickson and a unanimous court ruled that the sign laws contravened s 2 (b) of the Charter of Rights, as well as s. 3 of the Quebec Charter of
Human Rights and Freedoms and could not be justified as a «reasonable
limit» under s. 1 of the Charter and could not likewise be justified as an acceptable restriction on
freedom of expression under the Quebec Charter.
Human rights laws, and the tribunals that enforce them,
limit your
freedom of expression.
[143] PIPA, however, is regulatory and does not establish
human rights; it regulates the collection, use and disclosure of personal information, and in doing so
limits the
freedom of expression of some, but not all.
«It's a good thing provided it defends all cases of religious persecution, not just those that are bothering domestic constituencies at home, and that it doesn't ignore other
human - rights violations, which usually accompany religious persecution, like
limits on
freedom of the press, denial of democratic rights and persecution.»
Meaning, they hope the Supreme Court will strike down the laws that allow
human rights commissions (or tribunals) to
limit freedom of speech and religious expression.
A point that was brought up by Daniel Baril, anthropologist and journalist, and I think is important in the debate... «The wearing of religious symbols or clothing is not part of the
freedom of religion as defined in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights, which
limits the
freedom to the right to have a religion, to transmit / convey / communicate and to practice the rites (Article 18).»
Another commentary indicates that proposing article 18 as supporting the right to exclude people from a place would be «new ground» for this article: «It is unfortunate that the HRC [
Human Rights Committee] has issued so few consensus comments on the
limits to the
freedom to manifest religion or belief.