Not exact matches
But scientists at the INL quietly soldiered on, and
now the tide may be turning: The imperative to
limit greenhouse -
gas emissions is sparking an atomic renaissance on the very site
of nuclear energy's birth.
As the deployment
of these technologies will likely be
limited due to any combination
of the environmental, economic or energy constraints examined in the study, «Plan A» must be to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions aggressively
now.
On the contrary, roughly 80 percent
of HOT is devoted to on - the - ground reporting that focuses on solutions — not just the relatively well known options for reducing
greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise
limiting global warming, but especially the related but much less recognized imperative
of preparing our societies for the many significant climate impacts (e.g., stronger storms, deeper droughts, harsher heat waves, etc.,) that, alas, are
now unavoidable over the years ahead.
«Thus, while research on climate change should continue,
now is the time for individuals and governments to act to
limit the consequences
of greenhouse gas emissions on the Earth's climate over the next century and well beyond.»
That is far lower than other economists say, and it opens up the question just
now: why bother to cut
greenhouse gas emissions at all if that's the
limit of the cost?