Spending has to be allocated under tough
limits by constituency.
Not exact matches
The bill is set to slash charities» spending
limits by 60 %, restrict their spending in individual
constituencies to just # 9,750 and force those involved in coalition campaigning to count all the coalition's spending as their own.
In a package of moves hailed
by Miliband's team as the most significant since John Smith's «one member one vote» shakeup in the early 1990s, the Labour party is set to introduce a code of conduct for prospective parliamentary candidates, strict spending
limits and standard
constituency agreements with trade unions.
Add that outrageous betrayal of trust to her 2009 self - appointed pay raise (and the entire city council) that defied a majority opposition to any pay raise voiced at a public hearing, followed
by disobeying public referendum laws that recognized term
limits that she abrogated (in favor of arranging an unlawful third term for Michael Bloomberg to serve, that automatically guaranteed her own job security), plus a final and detrimental insult to the working poor that blocked our rightful vote on sick pay coverage, and collectively, it would make total sense to impeach and prosecute such unethical, improper and unfair conduct — that is unbecoming to anyone purporting to serve their
constituency.
At issue was whether the costs of a Conservative campaign battlebus should have been accounted for
by local campaigns where the legal spending
limits are tighter at between about # 11,000 and # 16,000, depending on the size of the
constituency
And I am not pursuing here the significant challenges, offered
by David Denver and others, to the Nuffield argument that
constituency campaigning usually makes
limited difference to the overall outcome.
The GOP is using the additional revenue gained
by capping the SALT deduction to lower taxes for its
constituencies (i.e. corporations and those with large estates to pass on) while keeping the total revenue lost below the $ 1.5 trillion
limit that Republicans set.
It lets down voters and
constituencies by limiting their choices and fosters negative and agressive political culture.
[12] This was partly based on the fact that the government's intention that the organisation not be controlled or heavily influenced
by urban activists succeeded in
limiting the voice of that
constituency in the NAC.