If you see the limits of science you see
the limits of atheism.
Agnostics see the limits of science and
the limits of atheism.
Not exact matches
Reddit is known for many things, including, but certainly not
limited to, its uncanny ability to spark viral content, the passion
of its commenters, and the thousands
of subreddits ranging on topics from health and fitness to
atheism.
A self
limiting existence in
atheism is contrary to nature and observation
of mankind even in the Americas and Australia.
Atheism is for people that want to be right about everything and can't admit there might be more to life than their
limited perception
of the world.
your brain is relatvely soo simple and therefore its comprehension is also very
limited, you believe in evolution so religion itself is an evolutionary process.Even
atheism also evolved, The arguments today is just part
of the evolutionary process
of change through dialectecal methods.The moment humans begin to understand and appreciate the dialectics then the solution to the problems argued is near.
Most often this is reflected in a form
of atheism that violently rejects and attempts to
limit others from discovering what they can not see using tools and methodology approved by them.
I agree that theism,
atheism and agnosticism can all co-exist because they all only speak to a
limited set
of questions.
Atheism is self center ism, otherwise known as Judaism, Every one in hinduism denial
of limit of truth absolute is a hindu terrorist.
Christian writes excited, star - struck letters to the self - described so - called «Brights»
of the New
Atheism, in which she gushes about the Brights» superiority while candidly evaluating the weaknesses that
limit the New
Atheism's ability to win new converts.
I'm agnostic, certainly not religious, but I have a
limited understanding
of atheism, short
of people on these belief boards and what we see in the media.
«And in driving it to
atheism — that there is necessarily no God — he goes way beyond the
limits of the evidence.»