Sentences with phrase «line is for nothing»

If you did not prepare the game in training then all you do on the line is for nothing and it will add to your frustration.

Not exact matches

Nothing is better for the bottom line than employees who are motivated to work for psychic benefits.

Line Deslandes served as chief compliance officer for one year, and was taken aback to find O'Leary was nothing like the ruthless businessman he appeared to be on television.

These restaurants also tend to feature reasonable - but - not - bargain prices (around $ 8 for an individual pizza), assembly lines with fresh ingredients, as well as plenty of stainless steel, see - through glass and open kitchens — so that, like Chipotle, the impression is that they have nothing to hide.

So far nothing special from any of the companies I hold and now I started doubting too if we will get anything one time special dividend or one time buybacks or anything even dividend growth has been generally in - line with past years at least for the companies I hold so far.

While the urgency to grow top line revenues is ever present, the last thing needed right now is to see a chunk of dollars dripping out of the bottom line with nothing to show for it.

The full truth is that I have nothing against trend lines, and yes I understand that there are «objective» methods out there detailing the «correct» method for choosing which two points to connect to draw a proper trend line (DeMark, Magee, I think Pring to name a few).

There's nothing in the theory of evolution which says an intermediate form (or any organism, for that matter) can have only one line of descendents, or that the intermediate form itself has to go extinct when a line of descendents evolves.

The presentation for this gives nothing to understand why she might cross the line of risque over to the perverse, so she is the only target for the outrage, not Thicke, whose work most of us have never heard outside of a very strange commercial that gives little indication of who the singer is.

Nothing is more difficult than drawing a middle line for social development.

Your personal experiences (delusions as I prefer to think of them as given your refusal to have them verified), count for nothing to anyone but you, they do not fall I line with he Burden of Proof and thus are not reliable enough to be considered evidence for your god.

-- This whole throwing mud at people because they toe the line at sexual sin, seems pretty devilish, and the deception that you do all this wonderful work for the poor while others do nothing, or at least the bragging of it (which you also see is not happening with those whom Christ commends «when did we do this?»)

Bottom line is he is in this for the money and headlines... nothing more.

Except for your last line, for to see through all things is to see precisely what is to be seen, precisely what is there, which is to say — nothing!»

Most religions are nothing but mythology, wrapped in text, painted with veiled threats, and for one reason... to keep the masses in line.

Believing in a system that was created by stone age men sitting around a fire telling fairy tales to scare kids and keep people in line, that was propagated by men who learned to write, and that was based on making a class of «preists» and holy men that could get money for doing nothing and that could dictate how olthers should live and molest boys and girls is stupid.

But from that base line, the hard, disputatious work of interpretation needs to be recognized precisely for what it is: nothing more than interpretation.

For the man of twofold vision nothing could be more illusory than the goal of success, nothing more false than money, and a long line of Protestant preachers in the 19th century continued to say so, though, by the end of the century some of their voices began to quaver.

Hilarious along the same lines as» I keep putting off my procrastinating» or» I have a touch of insomnia but it is nothing to lose sleep over» thanks for the laugh.

Nothing is more important for the church, I believe, at the level of theological education than the development of future - oriented centers of research, communication, and training along the lines I have only sketched here.

And no, you can't use Mary's lineage as nothing passes to the son from the mother and there is no basis in scripture for an adopted son to carry on the tribal line.

Nothing shady, nothing backstreet about this: I'm sitting on the Jubilee Line, staring at it, all jostling with advertisements for holidays, or meeting your true love, or getting the best insurancNothing shady, nothing backstreet about this: I'm sitting on the Jubilee Line, staring at it, all jostling with advertisements for holidays, or meeting your true love, or getting the best insurancnothing backstreet about this: I'm sitting on the Jubilee Line, staring at it, all jostling with advertisements for holidays, or meeting your true love, or getting the best insurance deal.

Many philosophers have accepted the assumption on which this objection rests — that there might have been nothing or that the existence of a world is cause for amazement — but it is Houston Craighead who has, in effect, aimed this line of argument against Hartshorne in a critique of the ontological argument (PS 1:9 - 24; RTE 33 - 37).

Evolution may have organized the universe, but our life is nothing but CHAOS, with NO guide line, NO purpose whatsoever, except the one that we give ourselves as members of a society, as we have to live together which is engraved in our nature, thus making us social animals, perhaps, and necessiciated for the continuity of the our species.

And this is the real danger for Christians today, a casual attitude toward our religion, a lassitude that lives out that famous line often attributed to Edmund Burke: For evil to thrive, all that is necessary is that good men do nothifor Christians today, a casual attitude toward our religion, a lassitude that lives out that famous line often attributed to Edmund Burke: For evil to thrive, all that is necessary is that good men do nothiFor evil to thrive, all that is necessary is that good men do nothing.

If you happen to be a creationist, I will vote for the candidate who believes in science, bit if you are wishy - washy, flip - floppy, or just «walking a fine line» that answers nothing, you do NOT deserve my vote.

It is the «two or three main lines» with which we have been concerned here; and there is nothing but danger, I believe, for Christian thought in attempting, or even in desiring, «to make everything right and tight.»

Nothing in this world, however, is likely to get on without it, for the world itself is built on patient lines.

Lay the cookies out on a foil lined sheet (make sure it's small enough to fit under the broiler if your broiler's in the bottom of the oven) and top with a square or two of chocolate followed by a marshmallow and broil for about a minute, making sure nothing catches on fire or burns too too much.

Little or nothing of the chicken is wasted, with lines also for giblets and for feet.

and time is running out, we are going to mis the boar again and we'll have Giroud the lampost leading the line He said it way back in May and its clear now that he meant it its Gioud or Nothing for Wenger and that means Nothing for Wenger and that means nothingnothing

Tie him down to a 6 year deal, 4 years down the line Suarez messi iniesta etc will not be there therefore barce will hopefully not be the force they have been for 10 years (hopefully) nothing stays the same forever as Man Utd have found out.might not be so appealing then for bellerin.

anyway I ain't freaked about seeing Giroud in my first choice Arsenal line up, so to me, there's nothing to worry abt, thanks to the depth of the squad which means everyone have to sit up or gets displaced by someone else due to the competition for places in the team and this includes Giroud.

Did he honestly think that line up was going to win on Sunday???? He'll have to go for the league cup now as he has nothing else to go for (maybe Europa???) What an idiot.....

I think Wenger made a big mistake by not returning Cech to the starting line - up yesterday considering this was a total must - win, all - or - nothing showdown, which is the perfect scenario for Cech to show his worth on the big stage.

Mikel's current deal with the Premier League outfit runs until 2017, and with the club unlikely to offer him an extension, they may be tempted to accept Gala's offer in a bid to avoid losing the midfielder for nothing further down the line.

Fishing for muskellunge is a sport that tests lines, hooks, lures, leaders, baits and the tender, undulating minds of muskie fishermen, who live in a half - world of hope and despair, knowing well that nothing they can do will move the muskie to strike until he is damn good and ready to strike.

Today we saw our attacking force without alexis... and it is a shame... for all of those talking nonsense about alexis being to selfish qnd that affecting our «fluency»... lacazzete is a cf so he needs people behind him... if we do nt buy q world class player to replace alexis we are done, we would not fight for the tittle... today was a friendly, but the difference was huge... do nt lie urself about we play with 2nd teqm players... we start with oyr first team in the middle and front line, and we did nothing... hope that 280k a week to ozil is a bad joke

when he was at LG that was when Mcfadden was his best, now we have nothing for an o line (except maybe gabe jackson as future hope).

As much as I appreciate what Wenger has done for the club, I would also appreciate it if he wasn't in charge next season, it's nothing personal I just feel that after the period of transition we have flat - lined and the truth is whether it be tactics, injuries, personal recruitment that have been contributing factors to us not being able to win the Premier league title... it's all on him and until we change manager this stupid cycle will persist... Eddie D

Of course, that only works when there's nothing on the line, since Mickelson and playing partners Luke Donald and Billy Horschel were the poster boys for slow play at the U.S. Open in June.

There is nothing to look forward to, but a top four and may be another «small» FA Cup under the guidance of a «deluded» manager who now, funny enough, can not find his behind sitting on the touch line... Doing his job for once!

Must we play our usual 4141,4231 can't we opt for 352 giving the circumstance we r into at the moment we really have nothing to lose at this point so I will go with this line up if I were AW Ospina Bell boss gibbs Ozil carzola coq ramsey sanchez Walcott giroud

When next season comes they'll be line for eason tickets and continue to buy merchandisin without nothing in return.

SEE MORE: How England could line up using Liverpool's highly successful 3 -4-3 formation, with new role for Sterling Six England humiliations: Joe Hart saying he knows nothing about Lithuania may have been unwise No fear!

For my money and this is only personally speaking I feel that Walcott should get far more stick than Giroud Walcott has been «developing» for nearly ten years and especially this season just gone has done next to nothing, even when given a place in the starting line For my money and this is only personally speaking I feel that Walcott should get far more stick than Giroud Walcott has been «developing» for nearly ten years and especially this season just gone has done next to nothing, even when given a place in the starting line for nearly ten years and especially this season just gone has done next to nothing, even when given a place in the starting line up.

I don't know if he has a» unhealthy fascination» for Wilshere or they are sucking each other testicles or he is really just tactically poor, but the young boy has nothing to do in the first line up, NOTHInothing to do in the first line up, NOTHINGNOTHING...!!

Any motivate the players he don't know how to be tactical he just picks the team and tells the same thing it's not working change it ever team will not play open so wenger needs to change the team players and style to defeat that also if a team presses us wenger does nothing to get round that same team same tactics that's the issue that's why arsenal won't win the league it's like a boxer going for head all the time you need to go for body to open up the other for the head shot wenger is to soft and it's transfers to the players remember the team he had before always makeing runs stretching teams even if they are sitting back spread there whole back line and midfield with run after run arsenal don't do that anymore they don't even shoot outside the box you know why because wenger tells them not to another tactic to draw another team out Ramsey can shoot but he never shoots anymore why is that wenger fact thanks guys.

SEE MORE: Feature: Time is right for Ryan Giggs to leave Manchester United Class of 92 urge Manchester United legend to have nothing to do with Mourinho reign Antoine Griezmann: Manchester United lining up # 65m bid for Atletico Madrid's CL hero

The bottom line is, the board and anyone with any real business sense will know what Wenger has done for this club during his tenure has been nothing short of a miracle.