Not exact matches
But language is what the poet has to work with, and so the poet is forced to take sometimes exaggerated, sometimes extreme steps to pierce the mundane, breaking up
lines, using words
in odd new
contexts, relying on sound effects and packing the stanzas with sensuous images and fragments from scripture, and the common language of faith suddenly takes on new
meaning through these odd juxtapositions.
When you asked me which parts had been debunked, and I wasn't allowed to cherry pick
lines out of
context that were
meant to be allegory to support my claim, I
in return asked what parts
in the bible then are suppsoed to be metaphorical and what are literal, obviously we won't agree because you already know my stance and I know yours, neither stance is going to change, but I'm interested to know from you specifically, what
in the bible is proven to be correct?
What does it
mean to walk a
line in today's
context of geopolitical and gender - based categorizations and boundaries?
By contrast, the view of the Advocate General (AG) appears much more
in line with the traditional philosophy of mutual trust
in the EU
context: even if Member States have discretion about the
means to execute the sentences delivered by their courts and even if EU law does not oblige a Member State to issue an EAW
in order to prevent impunity, Advocate General Jääskinen recalls that «the principle that every penalty must be executed forms part of the rule of law» whose respect is a common feature to all the Member States of the Union (§ 102, referring to the opinion of the AG).
In the context of contract law, it means something along the lines of «reasonable value of services»] or: [in contract law: Latin for «what is deserved
In the
context of contract law, it
means something along the
lines of «reasonable value of services»] or: [
in contract law: Latin for «what is deserved
in contract law: Latin for «what is deserved.]