Sentences with phrase «line readings do»

Not exact matches

What did I accomplish there that I didn't accomplish at my first job?Pretend you're the candidate and look beyond facts and figures; read between the lines to get a sense of the person's interests, goals, successes, failures, etc..

They don't always say it explicitly, so you'll have to be alert and read between the lines.

It read: «Love what you are doing... Very much in line with our Unilever Project Sunlight #brightfuture philosophy.»

«We are not complacent about what we need to do and we recognize that we need to get the top - line growing more quickly,» Read told Reuters in an interview.

Reading between the lines suggests that the Bank does not expect a strengthening in employment growth and any significant reduction in the unemployment rate over the next eighteen months; in other words before the 2015 election.

The reason being the entrepreneur didn't read the website and simply cast out a line baited with hope.

Wiep, have not still read all the articles, but I'll be the 2nd man (after you) to read every line of it — do you have desrcibed a method of localizing articles in non-English languages?

; 2) if yes, does he read the Report on Business, Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times or watch BNN, CNBC, or at least CBC's Bottom Line?

Instead of being so «narrow minded» and concerned about «women's rights» attempt to open your mind to people who do things very differently then you do but it is actually working... (Of course I am not naive enough to think my husband never sees another women walking down the street but read between the lines)

You also have to understand that truly studying the Bible does not mean that we read every line and then literally go out and act it out.

We are meant to read them as connected in some way, and while Graber does not spell out the connection, through the long, broken lines, a shadow lingers.

And then those who don't really read the Bible swallow these lies hook, line and sinker.

I don't get anything close to revocation even reading between the lines.

Surely, I don't say it in those words, but religious people don't like to read between the lines of an atheist.

Well guess what DallyDo, after reading only the first few lines of your paragraph it was easily discovered that you do not know what in the world you are talking about.

You must have either read my mind, or my post (a few lines down) wherein I responded to «Atheism's» «Prayer changes things» by saying: «Yep, I'm sure those 9 -1-1 terrorists (if you believe they were terrorists, and not government operatives... but that's another post for another blog...) were doing a lot of praying... and, boy, did they change things!»

However, their hot take does have one line that totally hits the nail on the head: «The Holy Bible is rated very highly by all the people who supposedly live by it but who in actuality have not read it.»

Along with advocating for better education in schools regarding reading the news, Cook says that companies like Apple have to do their part to walk the line between preventing fake news and censoring free speech.

you need to read the posts in context... youre wayout of line with that comment cause it had nothing to do with the topic

did you read the article linked in the first line: http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/13/world/anti-islam-filmmaker/index.html

For what do we long for when we read the Beatitudes, when we meditate on the words of Christ through lectio divina, when we join with Christians past and present to pray the hours, when we climb Teresa of Avila's «Interior Castle,» when we raise our hands in worship, when we eat the bread and drink the wine, when we walk the labyrinths, when like David we see that the night sky declares the glory of God, when we study the Bible in Hebrew and Greek, when we connect with a glorious line from Wendell Berry or Frederick Buechner, or Annie Dillard?

Far from cherry - picking, this is how Scripture is SUPPOSED to be read: IN context, NOT taking the line «this generation shall not pass» OUT of the context in which He was speaking, which is what you are doing, and, as noted, is a common error.

After all, what does «understanding» mean but an ability to read between the lines?

Furthermore, you've decided that since students who can write in english are on the decline that reading levels are going down... do you not see how stupid that line of reasoning is?

Just because the modern day racists are practiced at hiding their racism doesn't mean the rest of us can't read between the lines.

You read between the lines trying to understand everything they are saying and everything they don't say.

Dala... You are quite correct that I did read between the lines and made assumptions about you because you were very difficult to pin down.

You need to read the entire Bible, not just regurgitate a line someone told you, if you do you'll see the main messages and not the one - liners taken out of context.

We may begin, for example, with a certain tradition within the Church of England, in which the minister or priest performed his liturgical, homiletical, and pastoral duties, and perhaps even did spots of reading about them, but in which his serious continuing intellectual work along some particular line might have little or nothing to do with theology.

Bottom line, no one made you read this and you don't have to read the religion section on the CNN website... problem solved.

Where most Bible translations accurately translate the Greek as saying something along the lines of «The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God,» the NIV reads Calvinistic theology into this verse, and assumes that the natural man does not even have the Spirit, and so translated the verse this way: «The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God.»

Don't hesitate to read between the lines.

It's kind of sad that this kind of junk gets published and that a lot of people don't bother to, or choose not to, read between the lines.

For those of you who feel that LDS doctrine is at odds with Christian doctrine, first learn what LDS doctrine is, then read the Bible (something few on this board probably do) then you will realize that LDS doctrine is in line with Christ's teaching perfectly.

Having drawn the battle line at the Bible, conservatism will be required to exhaust itself in theories and explanations of how the Bible is not only infallible but does in fact, when read correctly, substantiate all the new theories discovered by the modern age.

I didn't even read it because the first line gives away the flawed premise of this article: people who are «spiritual» are missing something by not subscribing to a particular brand of religion.

i am undergoing such a change in the way i think about God and religion and reading some of your articles has been very refreshing — right now i am part of a very fundamental church and i need to get out - i am tired of the judgement and looking at people as «saved» and «unsaved» (we recently had a church event where if you brought an «unsaved» friend they got to rollerskate for free - i wanted to vomit)- i just want to follow Jesus - do nt know where to go but i do want to stay part of a church (for the sake of my children)- i saw somewhere on your blog that you too are in the hudson valley — are there any churches you can recommend that fall in line with your way of thinking?

I'm not certain, but I don't think «a little reading between the lines» holds up too well to close scrutiny.

Don't try to read between the lines or import ideas into my post from other sources.

Yes, fossils are the only thing that makes evolution ironclad... I'm sure you've really done your homework on the matter and your opinion is really top notch, I really really respect it (read entire line dripping with sarcasm)

I mean, don't get me wrong, I still think he's brilliant and enjoy reading his work... but this is a hard line and I'm not sure where it's coming from.

I didn't need to read farther than this line.

Actually Yeah you are really a ass my reading comprehension has nothing to do with it you have reprinted that line no less than 100 times.

Reading between the lines, we can say that the flood was a desperate attempt to gain the power that humans have, but cherubim do not have.

For the man who wrote those lines and for those who read them it was an obvious fact that a Christian must and did pray.

Well Tod if you are a azzhole such as yourself maybe by some chance you didn't read the last line so I will give you the benefit of the doubt knowing this, The disciples said He rose from the dead and is alive now that might help a bit don't you think?

Rick Perry may truly be a religious man, but I keep reading between the lines that he is a man who has demonstrated that he can be bought for the right price, does not care much about the environment, people except for the upper class, and who shuns science in favor of the party line and cash in pocket.

Then, just as we realize that the two large men are «church bouncers,» the scene fades to black and the tag line reads: «Jesus didn't turn people away.

The bottom line was that this pastor didn't like what I was saying, and therefore, didn't like that people were reading what I was teaching, and viewed any form of trying to get my message out as self - promotion.

This has nothing to do with a fraudulent skincare line or anything else you'll inevitably read.