Not exact matches
When
done right, it can strengthen your brand
value and ideally even your bottom
line.
As mass shootings continue to devastate communities across the country, it's time to state unequivocally that gun violence is not in
line with our
values, nor
do these weapons belong on Bumble.
Their themes — don't risk it all, stay small, charge for
value, free is stupid — fly in the face of the conventional image that web success comes from big startups that attract massive amounts of free users and then massive buyouts — yet they're right in
line with a time - honored business practice: making a profit.
Begin to find ways to create greater
value to your prospect's top, middle and bottom
lines, and you'll get them to
do business with you faster than you would have ever imagined.
People will be able to track the progress of ships and their cargo around the world in the network and transactions involving the cargo and ships will be
done in Tulipcoin — so the
value should rise in
line with international trade.
By all means, run the numbers to see how your generosity will affect the bottom
line, but don't discount the goodwill and PR that can add
value to your business.
Here are four possible
lines of thought, and what you can
do to keep your standing as a
valued part of the team:
But think about just the most basic level, people who come to Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, about 100 billion times a day to share content or a message with a specific set of people, and I think that that basic functionality, people understand because we have the controls in
line every time, and given the volume of the activity and the
value that people tell us that they are getting from that, I think that that control in
line does seem to be working fairly well.
Multiplying the overhead necessary for physical offices — the receptionist, photocopier, phones
lines, utilities — just for the sake of saying he has offices in multiple locations will drag down his profits and
do nothing to grow the
value of his business.
For example, Mary Barra started out as a quality inspector on the General Motors (GM) assembly
line before going on to become the company's first female CEO, and she says her time on the
line helped her really
value the people who
did that role for the company.
«We just chatted about it — we
do a lot of our talking over Slack — and everyone was really in agreement that Hillary Clinton's
values are really in
line with Winnie's
values.»
But the bottom
line is this: Millennials face an impossibly high amount of student debt, their college degrees don't hold the same
value as they
did in previous generations, and this has influenced a new approach to life — one that integrates life and work as one unified concept.
«It's your responsibility as an employer to set your employees up for success, and making sure their
values and work ethic is in
line with your culture before extending an offer is the very first thing you can
do for them and the rest of your workforce.»
So if you drew a horizontal
line and call that fair
value like Ben Graham said, and then you draw a wavy
line around that horizontal
line and call that stock prices, the market is pitching us opportunities all the time between stocks that are way below fair
value and way above fair
value, the reason investors don't beat the market has nothing to
do with the market is not throwing us pitches in that it's not still emotional, they are behavioral problem, there's agency problems, there is a lot of other issues going on but it's not because we're not getting really great pictures all the time.
While that's great if your spending falls in
line with the cards» bonus categories, they don't offer much
value otherwise.
When you don't have to worry about keeping up your own network, your team is free to focus on what really matters: adding
value to customers and growing the bottom
line.
While the loan - to -
value ratio is not the only determining factor in securing a mortgage or home equity loan or
line of credit, the metric
does play a substantial role in how much borrowing costs the homeowner.
The bottom
line: If you don't have the time, patience or resources to find hidden gems like these phenomenal concentrated
value investors, stick to a passive, well - diversified portfolio.
The problem with this
line of thinking is that if stock selection doesn't add
value, then active management doesn't add
value either, and low - cost index funds become a superior choice.
We're certainly willing to assume higher growth rates for well - managed companies with defensible product
lines, which is why we don't simply define
value as «low P / E» or «low price - to - book.»
The Buffett - based strategy is
line - in with the market, a reflection of high quality names
doing better than deep
value stocks.
 Almost a quarter of that was the auto aid. It was important for preserving jobs, for sure. But
does it count as «stimulus,» in the sense of stimulating expenditure? I don't think so. It was more in the realm of a balance sheet transfer that kept an important company going. If the auto aid was «stimulus,» then so too was the much larger
line of credit which Ottawa advanced to the banks (they could have tapped $ 200 billion under Mr. Flaherty's EFF mechanism)-- all of which was also repaid. In that case, Ottawa's «stimulus» was more like a quarter - trillion dollars... far outpacing everyone else in the OECD as a share of GDP! Of course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true
value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffs).
Leo is the more effective because he exemplifies those
values, writing in a conversational tone that invites his readers to entertain the possibility that truth
does not come in packaged party
lines.
These women don't claim moral reasons to ditch nudity, but they are questioning a ploy that
values what they
do for bottom
lines more than what they
do.
Which leads to the necessity of codes, rules, regulations, laws, mores, taboos and expectations, because it is only when someone measures up to something or doesn't measure up to something that it can be determined where they are on the
value line.
It doesn't matter if Mike Brown was on his way to college or on his way to the unemployment
line — his life had
value and purpose.
I endure direct challenges to my belief system routinely and grow the wiser with each encounter; not hardening my position but encouraging me to think more deeply and walk the
line of humanistic
values all the further to justify myself to those who ask me to
do so.
Consequently, Whitehead's philosophy of nature
does not demand that gravity is propagated along the straight
lines of a prior geometry, and hence the
value of the gravitational constant is not a function of the prior geometry as Will and Ariel claim.
if humans had just fell in
line with religious teachings and never asked questions other than «god
did it»... then people would still be dying in child birth, the common cold, small poxs etc etc etc. i find that we survived a s a species to become the alpha predator of this planet and the achievements we have made since then to be amazing; attributing everything humans have achieved to a god just cheapens the
value of our achievements as a species.
Maybe your
line of work encourages you to adopt a certain lifestyle that
does not glorify God or maybe you don't agree with the
values of your organization.
«Our moral
values and commitments don't fall along left, right, liberal and conservative
lines,» Wallis said.
If you want to live by medieval standards and in
line with your religion, fine, no problem, but choose the right country where that is the norm and
do not try to force your
values onto your adopted country.
«I think the breadth of our product
line and our entire process know - how is of
value, and some of our competitors, they might know filling and closing or they might know extraction, but they don't know how that flows through the rest of the other processes that are required within the product chain,» Saavedra says.
This is in
line with Nestlé's «Creating Shared
Value» approach to
doing business.
Does your
value proposition hold
value down the
line?
With a bigger sample size (16 picks), the most extreme thing the Pats and Eagles
did in
valuing positions is the Pats using these picks to build DL depth and the Eagles completely ignoring the defensive
line.
The media loves to over-publicize teams on a winning streak and vastly overreact to struggling teams, but
does that create any
value on the betting
line?
I'm guessing the
lines don't start to show real
value until people start over - and under - rating teams based on their first game or two... I'm thinking week 3.
I know some folks don't
value right tackle as highly as some other positions on the offensive
line in the first round, but ask yourself how differently the Super Bowl might have turned out had the Panthers had a better player at that position.
I don't think anyone else on the roster could replace fox's
value on his current
line and I don't think the uptick on the janmark - spezza
line would be big enough to cover the drop - off caused by shifting fox up the lineup
Ideally, it would be an AV
value normalized for snap counts, but absent that (it would take a decent amount of work, I think) you could
do AV / 16 starts, or something along those
lines.
Anyone that doesn't base their research on
line movements, betting trends and true
line value is wasting time and money.
I
do believe there is some
value on the Rockies at this point, especially if the
line continues to creep up.
With the
line now -2.5, don't be surprised to see sharp bettors buyback the Jaguars based on
line value alone.
We
do not recommend betting against every single ranked team, but knowing that these rankings can artificially inflate the
line based on public perception can help add
value for sharp bettors.
Public bettors don't care if Golden State is -13 or -14, but these inflated
lines can create
value on the other side.
Seeing as the Cowboys don't employ a 2 - gap technique along the defensive
line, I just don't see how Vea is a great fit beyond the perceived
value of him «falling» to us.
We normally don't focus on All - Star games, but wanted to highlight the
line moves and potential contrarian
value.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then
do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we
did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market
value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I
do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club...
does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the
line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has
done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
I don't necessarily make
value picks solely on the market, but in this case there's definitely some sharper money on Watford in order to bring the
line down.