That's good ol Roy Spencer, creationist and fellow at the ExxonMobil funded Heartland Institute, a libertarian think tank and propaganda machine whose past endeavors include working with Philip Morris to question the science
linking second hand smoke and cancer.
Not exact matches
Breathing
second -
hand smoke in childhood is
linked to a variety of respiratory conditions, such as asthma and bronchitis.
Results showed that there is relatively strong
link between
second hand smoke and cancer in cats; the risk is higher when the animal has been exposed five years or longer.
In dogs,
second -
hand smoke has been
linked to tumor formation in the lungs and an increase in nasal adenocarcinoma, particularly in long - nosed breeds.
Do I think that scientists should continue to evaluate the
link between cancer and
second hand smoke?
A review in PLOS One by Yang et al. finds no
link between
second -
hand smoke in breast cancer.
Dana (sks) does the smear here (look at the photo): http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/jan/06/climate-change-climate-change-scepticism note this is the updated version after complaints, but even so it still misrepresents, LIndzen thinks the
link between
second hand smoking is tenuous, they still imply actual
smoking..
[2] Booker has opposed the scientific consensus on numerous issues including global warming, the
link between
second -
hand smoke and cancer, and the negative health effects of asbestos.
As more studies have indicated that there is a
link between
second -
hand smoke, respiratory diseases, and cancer, it is not surprising that courts are taking
smoking habits into consideration.