Some attribution assessments that
link events to dynamically driven changes
in circulation have been criticized on the grounds that small signal - to - noise ratios,
modeling deficiencies, and
uncertainties in the effects of
climate forcings on circulation render conclusions unreliable and prone to downplaying the role of anthropogenic change.
PLUMES (funded by the Academy of Finland), «Pathways
linking uncertainties in model projections of
climate and its effects», consortium partner leader, 2014 — 2018