Rebuttals are not hard to find (if you go to «start here» on the top of the RC page, and scroll to the section that says «Informed, but seeking serious discussion of common contrarian talking points» each one of
those links discusses this claim, and similar ones).
Not exact matches
The dossier paints Cohen as a key player in the Russia - Trump relationship, and includes (again, unverified)
claims that Cohen met with Russian officials in Prague in August 2016 to
discuss how to pay Kremlin -
linked hackers for targeting Clinton during the election.
Above: Brian Deer
discusses his inquiry which exposed fraud behind
claims linking autism with a vaccine
It's even more amusing to see so many
claims that this model could work, that model could work, and
links to articles
discussing dreamt - up models and scenarios.
Here's a
link to an article
discussing protective
claims while courts are working.
This
link points to a sequence of emails in which George Monbiot and Ian Plimer
discuss Plimer's
claims and Monbiot's criticisms of those
claims.
This
link discusses some of the
claims that have been made regarding reliability of wind and then shows them false using data from those operating the wind farms.
I don't know how someone writes a piece
claiming an error wasn't spotted while
linking to a source that writes paragraph after paragraph
discussing how the error was found and (not well) addressed.
If you are looking for more information regarding the topics
discussed you can click on the following
links to access my archived posts addressing no - fault benefits, unidentified motorist
claims and the two roles of ICBC.