Not exact matches
Link building demands a heavy upfront investment before you start earning a suitable return on your ongoing
efforts, but it
's definitely
worth it once you understand the many types of returns you'll see.
Purely relying on directly requesting
links from people
is time consuming and not
worth the return on
efforts in the long run.
This reality and the conditions that pertain to it mean that you can float on the seas of authority bloat that fuels your vertical, but the
efforts that it requires
is simply not
worth it to build any kind of sustained ranking, as too many levers must float in your favor — such as the website where your
link was originally hosted maintaining it
's weight before
being pillaged by other SEOs capable of basic competitive research — or your competitors
being bad enough to not have an SEO who has heard of competitive research — in order for it to
be a worthwhile strategy.
Worth a try to see if that could
be your bottleneck, a shame if you do everything right but can not enjoy the benefits of your
efforts because of one weak
link.
Link up
's are all about networking and making wonderful connections, trust me — it
's worth the
effort.
Also
worth noting here that \ author site \
is a terrible moniker for the these — they can range from highly engaging, time - consuming
efforts in which the authors
are genuinely involved to splash pages that offer a blurb and
link to retailers.
Of course, a climate scientist might object that WUWT offers far too much chaff to wade through to
be worth the
effort, but that
is not the criticism of WUWT offered in the article you
linked.
-- Sorry just listened to the Hansen audio
link above and to
be honest even though I have a BSc this story
is not
worth the
effort of trying to understand, from my point of view the paper in question
is just one amoungst many and will
be shot down in a hail of negative cites, OTOH it would
be fine for a «Friday roundup».