The first bone of contention the plaintiffs have is that the company offered the «microscopically low - yielding» Vanguard Prime Money Market
Fund, rather than a stable value fund that would have provided better returns while preserving capital and liquidity without any greater increase in risk compared to money market investme
Fund, rather than a
stable value fund that would have provided better returns while preserving capital and liquidity without any greater increase in risk compared to money market investme
fund that would have provided better returns while preserving capital and
liquidity without any greater increase
in risk compared to money market investments.