The following is a non-exhaustive
list of statutory provisions pursuant to which courts may order publication bans (current to July 2008):
Not exact matches
To every
statutory provision are attached a long
list of «buts» — some in the statute itself, some that have been clarified by various courts, and some not yet discovered.
The foregoing
statutory provision lists three types
of nurses authorized to draw blood for DWI cases: registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, and nurse designated by order
of a circuit court.
It is odd, therefore, to find on Judicial Power's
list of 50 «problematic» cases Liversidge v Anderson — which is criticised by the editors
of the
list as showing «excessive deference to the executive's wide discretionary powers in wartime» and for «giving no effect to a
statutory provision requiring the Home Secretary to have reasonable grounds for a detention decision».
In a
provision not related to sex education but to adolescents more broadly, Georgia enacted a
provision expanding the
list of individuals and organizations required to report suspected instances
of statutory rape to include employees or volunteers
of organizations that provide reproductive health services.
Courts have interpreted the
statutory provision requiring a
listing agreement to contain an expiry date as seeking «to introduce a high degree
of certainty into
listing agreements, and to place the onus
of ensuring such certainty exists on the broker.»