Larger firms, on the other hand, may suffer from their own caste system that keeps them from
listing nonlawyer tech experts on EDD practice pages, Friedmann predicts.
Not exact matches
The ABA's Commission on the Future of Legal Services may play a role in this game as it considers the new practices
nonlawyers are using to deliver legal services — something the U.K. has through its
list of reserved activities only licensed lawyers may do.
For example, if a firm
lists its partners on its letterhead or on its website, then the
nonlawyer's name must be included, or that would be considered a misrepresentation or omission in violation of Rules 7.1 and 7.5.
Does it — could it — also encompass structures, be they companies or other types of organizations, that are owned in whole or in part by
nonlawyers, and that provide legal services outside the limited contexts of existing companies like the ones
listed above, but in «nontraditional» manner such that it could be difficult to describe the structure as a traditional «law firm»?
Lawyers in most places are not permitted to share fees with
nonlawyers, practice in firms owned by both lawyers and
nonlawyers, use
nonlawyers to feed business to lawyers, or
list unlicensed
nonlawyers as legal practitioners on stationery or advertising.