Neither is
a literal picture of reality, yet neither should be treated as a useful fiction.
Naive realism is untenable if models are not
literal pictures of reality and if the history of science is characterized by major paradigm shifts rather than by simple cumulation or convergence.
They are neither
literal pictures of reality nor «useful fictions», but partial and provisional ways of imagining what is not observable; they are symbolic representation of aspects of the world which are not directly accessible to us.
Like scientific models, they are neither
literal pictures of reality nor useful fictions.
On the one hand, they are not
literal pictures of reality.
Not exact matches
He rightly insists that models are not
literal descriptions or
pictures of reality, but he does not discuss the development
of a coherent set
of beliefs based on the models.25