Additionally, our employment lawyers have
litigated these issues in state and federal courts in class / collective actions as well as in cases initiated by individuals.
Once identified, special litigation lawyers strategically
litigate those issues in State and Federal courts to improve both process and outcomes for all accused New Yorkers.
Indeed, law enforcement use of force is among the more commonly
litigated issues in both state and federal court, and as many lawyers know, officers have some immunity from suit.
Not exact matches
The Common Core will continue to be
litigated in some
state houses, like Arizona, but for the most part legislators are getting tired of the
issue.
Litigating in federal and
state courts involving
issues of trademark grants, infringement and dilution, unfair trade practices, licensing and assignment
Millions of couples have already
litigated all the
issues in your
state.
Mr. Feldman advises employers and business executives on all aspects of employment - related
issues and policies, and regularly
litigates employment
issues before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and
in federal and
state courts.
He
litigates matters
in state and federal courts as well as patent validity
issues before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Beyond being one of the largest claims recently
litigated in this jurisdiction, the claim raised complex legal
issues including
issues as to the law of bribery and dishonest assistance, the capacity of a foreign
state entity and complex conflict of laws
issues.
Mr. Feldman regularly
litigates employment
issues before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and
in federal and
state courts.
He regularly
litigates employment
issues before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and
in federal and
state courts.
In addition to her trial and appellate experience, Elaine is skilled in arbitration matters (ICC, AAA, JAMS, FINRA and other self - regulatory organizations), litigates challenges to arbitral awards under both the FAA and state equivalents, and litigates issues regarding arbitrability of claim
In addition to her trial and appellate experience, Elaine is skilled
in arbitration matters (ICC, AAA, JAMS, FINRA and other self - regulatory organizations), litigates challenges to arbitral awards under both the FAA and state equivalents, and litigates issues regarding arbitrability of claim
in arbitration matters (ICC, AAA, JAMS, FINRA and other self - regulatory organizations),
litigates challenges to arbitral awards under both the FAA and
state equivalents, and
litigates issues regarding arbitrability of claims.
We are highly experienced
in the negotiation of international freight transportation - related contracts and have
litigated numerous transportation contract disputes and other transportation - related
issues before
state and federal courts, administrative agencies, and domestic and international arbitration panels.
Monckton Chambers offers a wealth of experience
in litigating and advising on
State aid
issues at every level, including the UK courts, the EU General Court and the ECJ.
We advise registered representatives and companies on FINRA conduct rules, including broker check disputes and Form U4 / U5
issues; defend companies and individuals
in FINRA regulatory investigations and enforcement proceedings; represent companies and individuals
in industry and customer disputes
in the FINRA forum; and
litigate cases arising under federal and
state securities laws.
Litigating more than 100 class actions and collective actions
in California, New York, Georgia, and Maryland involving a variety of employment
issues, including wage - hour and discrimination claims, and successfully defeating motions for class certification on such claims
in both federal and
state courts.
Although certain
state eligibility requirements must first be met, uncontested divorces typically can be finalized faster that traditional divorces, as the parties do not need to
litigate their
issues in court.
If the noncustodial parent agrees to the removal, the parents can likely avoid a legal action
in state court to
litigate the
issue.
Where a claimant sues
stating that the
issue has been determined
in a prior action, the defence may be faced with the principle that it would be an abuse of process to permit the matter to be
litigated.
The Court has considered whether a litigant has a right to bring federal takings claims
in federal court, even if the
issues have already been
litigated in state court.
128 DOS 93 Matter of DOS v. Vuksanaj - motion to conform pleadings to proof granted where (i) additional evidence wouldn't have been presented if the charge had been
stated in the complaint and (ii)
issue was actually
litigated and was within the «broad framework of the pleadings»; broker's authorization to execute lease on behalf of landlord must be
in writing to be valid (G.O.L. § 5 - 703); no commission earned on void lease (due to lack of written authority for broker to sign for landlord); broker is undisclosed «double agent» - thus «fails to make clear» for which party he is acting (NYCRR 175.7); broker is not «managing agent» under NYC Rent Stabilization Code unless (i) broker has ownership or financial interest
in property or (ii) performs managerial duties; separate escrow account (§ 175.1) not required when broker is not holding escrowed funds; holding funds overnight does not trigger requirement for escrow account (returned next day upon demand); unlicensed name used
in commission agreement but lack of intent to mislead considered
in mitigation; restitution of unearned commission
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that an eminent domain case raising
issues already
litigated and decided
in state court can't be subsequently tried through the federal court system.
189 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Naftal - listing agreements; deposits; unauthorized practice of law; vicarious liability; amendment of pleading to conform to the proof; improperly altering listing agreement without the consent or knowledge of principal to show the potential commission split with buyer's broker to meet MLS requirements; preparing and submitting fraudulent MLS change notifications purporting to extend and alter listings; deposit of escrow funds into operating account; preparation of lease constitutes the unauthorized practice of law; pleadings may be amended to conform to the proof and encompass a charge not
stated in the complaint where the
issue has been fully
litigated by the parties and is closely enough related to the
stated charges that there is no surprise or prejudice to the respondent; continuing to offer properties for sale after preparation of forged listing extensions violates 19 NYCRR 175.10; DOS fails to establish violation of 19 NYCRR 175.12 for failure to provide copy of listing extension where extension was not authorized by principal; DOS fails to demonstrate demand for unearned commission where broker may have believed they were entitled to a commission; broker's licenses suspended for one year and thereafter until such time as restitution
in the amounts of $ 5,000.00 and $ 2,055.40 is made