What if a publisher's licensing model involves selling competitive intelligence to interests that are in
litigation against your client's?
Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced federal
litigation against our client, alleging that our client was the Malaysian entity's «alter ego,» or alternatively, had received «fraudulent conveyances» of money and / or receivables from the Malaysian entity that should have been turned over to plaintiff to satisfy the default judgment.
Not exact matches
We are experienced in assisting our
clients in handling
litigation matters, both as plaintiff counsel and in providing defense
against actions undertaken
against them.
Deals with
clients in business
litigation such as that between Pillsbury and the SonicBlue board may be perfectly reasonable in most situations, but in bankruptcy, where the interests of creditors are paramount in a debtor - in - possession situation, such a deal undermines the entire process because Pillsbury could not be expected to fully pursue claims
against the board if Pillsbury was potentially on the hook for any damages by agreement.
Due to the approach of the market, we are able to provide advice on the possibilities and challenges when acting for or
against clients having their case financed by
litigation funders.
Successfully resolving claims
against clients for over 25 years on terms favorable to
clients, including technology vendor contract disputes and other commercial
litigation, lease disputes for national and regional companies, and early resolution of several class action claims
against national retailers and international travel company.
Mahsa is a committed advocate on behalf of injured
clients in all areas of personal injury
litigation, with a focus on medical malpractice proceedings
against physicians, hospitals, nurses and other health care professionals.
We provide
clients with budgeting, forecasting and regularly updated case evaluations identifying the potential cost of
litigation balanced
against the risks the dispute poses as well as the potential upside for a
client.
Recently, the expanding TDS Law Tax
Litigation Practice successfully represented
clients against the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) on the following matter:
Mesa Law Firm successfully represented its
client in a commercial
litigation matter
against a large credit card company involving claims of breach of contract, violation of Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act and slander of credit.
Mesa Law Firm successfully represented its
client in a commercial
litigation matter it brought
against an individual involving claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, tortious interference with business relationships, defamation and injunctive relief.
We also advise
clients in claims prevention and on warning and recall issues, document creation and retention programs, and other strategies and practices to limit and defend
against potential
litigation.
Johnston is also advising a construction company in a claim
against a solicitor relating to negligent advice regarding a Part 36 offer and cost consequences given to the
client following
litigation, and Hall is handling a claim
against solicitors for negligence and a breach of fiduciary duty relating to a property transaction.
Plaintiff jury verdict in CT Complex
Litigation Court with damages awarded
against business
client of $ 0.00.
While our firm attempts to negotiate and settle cases as early on as possible, our skilled litigators represent
clients in mediation and arbitration proceedings and vigorously defend
against medical malpractice claims at all stages of the
litigation process, including appeals.
Served as trial counsel for a major national manufacturer in a lengthy NLRB proceeding in which the
client prevailed on bad faith bargaining, secondary boycott and threat of violence charges
against the Teamsters Union, secured three separate federal court injunctions
against the Union and won an unprecedented award of attorneys» fees and
litigation costs [reported at 334 NLRB No. 137]
There is no concept of play book data — a general understanding of a
client's business or
litigation philosophy is not confidential unless it can be used
against the
client in some tangible manner.
It is the fact of having confidential information which is material to the fresh retainer and which must not be disclosed in any circumstances to a third party; or, as here, to the wife in later
litigation against H, the solicitor's former
client.
although Attis deals with this issue in the context of a class proceeding, the decision underscores the importance of certain «best practices» that can be applied universally by
litigation counsel to insulate
against a
client's claim for costs indemnification.
With substantial employment
litigation experience, we represent
clients before state and federal courts, the Massachusetts Commission
Against Discrimination, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
On June 29, 2017, Davis Polk achieved a total victory in a
litigation filed in New York state court
against its
client Consolidated Edison, Inc..
Notable examples include acting for accountants in long - running
litigation arising out of a failed tax avoidance scheme; acting for the developer and manufacturer of an offshore drilling system following an accident in operation; representing one of the Defendants in Novoship v Mikhaylyuk & Others, concerning allegations of bribery and secret profits; appearing in a substantial LCIA arbitration about the theft of oil stocks in East Africa;, successfully representing a broker in
litigation against a former
client under a futures brokerage contract in Sucden v Fluxo - Cane [2010] 2 CLC 216; and The «Ekha» [2011] 1 All ER Comm 1077, long - running
litigation in the Commercial Court and Court of Appeal about an offshore drilling contract.
Tightening regulatory controls and compliance, the «consumer» approach adopted by
clients to professional service provision, and an increase in professional negligence claims have caused
litigation lawyers to err on the side of over-servicing as a safeguard
against complaints or claims.
According to the San Francisco legal newspaper The Recorder, Los Angeles - based Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges ran an ad in one of its business
litigation newsletters boasting of its recent victories, including securing a $ 65 million settlement for its former
client, ConnectU in its trade secret theft lawsuit
against Facebook and its founder, Mark Zuckerberg.
Provides counseling, strategy, and
litigation support to
clients interested in litigating under the ACPA
against domain infringers / cybersquatters.
Ferriter Law represents
clients in all aspects of
litigation, arbitration, and mediation, including businesses
against businesses, individuals
against businesses, commercial and individual lenders, commercial and individual borrowers, shareholders, boards of directors and managers, suppliers, and investors.
As head of the consumer financial services enforcement and
litigation practice at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, he's devoted much of the past year to defending banking and lending
clients against litigation stemming from the subprime mortgage crisis.
MG+M takes an aggressive approach to protecting
clients against the dangers of class action
litigation.
The fervor with which they pursue their claim (often their life's sole focus, often misconceived, and often containing vexatious and extreme allegations
against your
client), and their lack of objectivity, significantly increase the costs of
litigation for the defendant...» (Layperson vs. Lawyer: Dealing with Unrepresented Litigants http://www.cle.bc.ca/onlinestore/productdetails.aspx?cid=1039) Hmmm... sound familiar?
Examples of his recent case - load are: led by Ed Pepperall QC in a large - scale action arising from a defective share sale; defended solicitors from allegations arising from property transactions, including alleged breaches of the Etridge guidance; acting for a claimant
against solicitors who negligently handled his
litigation; defending an IFA from allegations of inappropriately risky investment advice; acting for solicitors claiming contributions from another firm in respect of their own liability for breach of trust; advising
clients on a claim
against surveyors for losses arising from negligent property valuations.
[38] This should all be done to guard
against the lawyer taking what would be an inappropriate personal interest in the
litigation thereby putting at risk his or her obligation to provide the
client with objective advice and undivided loyalty.
Barristers from Essex Court Chambers conducted the defence of claims of bribery and corruption, dishonest assistance and conspiracy brought by two Russian state - owned companies, Sovcomflot and Novoship,
against their
clients in the massive Fiona Trust
litigation.
Remaining at the forefront of toxic tort
litigation, Carr Maloney defends
clients of all sizes
against lead paint poisoning, mold and asbestos exposure, carbon monoxide and Legionnaire's Disease cases.
Recognizing that
litigation results — and the prospects for settlement — often hinge on the presentation of persuasive legal arguments in line with the relevant case law, Mr. Cooper employs an effective mix of case law research and evidence consultation in order to ensure that
clients on a tight budget understand all the costs and benefits of proceeding with, or defending
against, a legal action.
For example, corporate lawyers who never litigate might discover that a
client has assumed that they will handle
litigation arising out of a corporate transaction; or a
client working with a lawyer to resolve a return - to - work issue might assume that the lawyer will also take responsibility for filing an action
against the employer or
against a benefits provider.
According to her checklist she gives to
clients, it would allow them to mitigate
against the risk of CASL
litigation and regulatory enforcement by making sure they have a CASL compliance program.
No firms gain more by dragging out
litigation than the big firms because they have the
clients with the tens and hundreds of millions of dollars of capitalization who can afford, with the help of the taxpayer, to pay the astronomical fees they charge for as long as it takes to take on similar corporations similarly represented, or to squash the little guy (which is why FCT has McCarthy's on retainer and Stewart has Borden's on retainer — the given real estate file / title insurance claim is small potatoes but the title insurers make it dead obvious that if you sue them, you will up
against a Big Firm.
At Altman & Altman LLP, our Boston - based personal injury attorneys have over 50 years of experience getting our
clients the benefits they are entitled to for as long as they require to get better, and aggressively pursuing
litigation against negligent employers and third parties responsible for the injury — whether they are backed by billion dollar corporations such as Amazon or not.
His prior experience defending corporate
clients continues to inform his
litigation strategies in his current capacity representing individuals pursuing civil cases
against businesses who profit through the violations of consumer rights.
Among other areas, our
litigation experience in the environmental area includes governmental and private - party actions under CERCLA (including serving as lead counsel for PRP groups at major Superfund sites throughout the United States), citizen suits under RCRA, the Clean Water Act and other environmental laws, claims for property damage and personal injury arising from industrial emissions or environmental contamination, and defending
clients against state and federal governmental enforcement actions.
The former partner filed a 19 - count complaint
against our
client and the lawyers that represented him in the original
litigation.
This is not unlike the
Litigation Frenzy, where lawyers are pitted
against other lawyers, and ultimately themselves, to waste reams of paper while losing sight of a fair resolution for their
clients.
The Frankfurt Kurnit
Litigation team registered a big win for our music management
clients in a lawsuit brought
against them in Los Angeles Superior Court, successfully obtaining summary judgment.
By helping to lead systemic
litigation in California and Florida, she has helped thousands of
clients who have been discriminated
against to win their cases and restore their rights.
If the privilege is available, advantages of asserting the privilege include that the
client may be prevented from making statements in a civil proceeding that could be used
against him or her in future criminal or civil proceedings or private civil
litigation.82 In addition, testifying in a civil or criminal proceeding may, under certain circumstances, amount to a waiver of the Fifth Amendment privilege for purposes of the same proceeding and any future proceedings.83 Conversely, risks of asserting the privilege include that adverse inferences may, under certain circumstances, be drawn in civil or administrative proceedings from an individual's assertion of Fifth Amendment rights in a prior civil or administrative proceeding.84 Moreover, an individual's assertion of the privilege in a civil proceeding could factor into law enforcement's charging decisions.
We are continually pushing the boundaries of what can be done by arranging tailored programs for our Law Firm partners to ensure that their
clients are properly insured
against the risks they face in their
litigation journey.
Our top priority is to ensure the protection of our
client's confidential and proprietary information, both
against cyber-attacks and in
litigation, while creating an environment conducive to cost effective, efficient eDiscovery practice once a lawsuit is imminent.
«
Litigation — particularly complex cross-border litigation — is a minefield where you need to balance client expectations against complex long established practices and procedures, laws and re
Litigation — particularly complex cross-border
litigation — is a minefield where you need to balance client expectations against complex long established practices and procedures, laws and re
litigation — is a minefield where you need to balance
client expectations
against complex long established practices and procedures, laws and regulations.
The firm's
litigation team aimed to help its
client gain control of the investment by pursuing twin civil and criminal claims
against the investors, enlisting the help of forensic accountants and court - appointed experts to provide evidence of the fraud.
«
Litigation - particularly complex cross-border litigation — is a minefield where you need to balance client expectations against complex long established practices and procedures, l
Litigation - particularly complex cross-border
litigation — is a minefield where you need to balance client expectations against complex long established practices and procedures, l
litigation — is a minefield where you need to balance
client expectations
against complex long established practices and procedures, laws and...