Sentences with phrase «litigation claims encouraged»

For example, our observation of the upward trend in litigation claims encouraged us to focus on communicating about forthcoming changes to the administrative dismissal regime, while the stability of the rest of the pattern made 2015 a good year to publish a LAWPRO Magazine issue devoted to stress management and career satisfaction, issues relevant to lawyers from all practice areas.

Not exact matches

This, by implication, will encourage the verification of legal claims through litigation rather than resorting to violence,» he added.

Business groups, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, are not fans of litigation financing, claiming that it encourages frivolous lawsuits.

The protocol aims to ensure all reasonable steps are taken to avoid litigation before the commencement of proceedings, and to encourage the exchange of early and full information about the prospective legal claim.

Thus the due diligence process undertaken by a third - party litigation funder can act as a filter to ensure that only meritorious claims are pursued, and this in turn may encourage defendants to seek a settlement.

As Master Cameron aptly points out, «As is almost always the case, unless a settlement occurs «on the courthouse steps», there is something more that could be done by counsel for the parties but Supreme Court Civil Rule 15 - 1 is meant to encourage timely settlement and resolution of litigation, including claims for costs.

As is almost always the case, unless a settlement occurs «on the courthouse steps», there is something more that could be done by counsel for the parties but Supreme Court Civil Rule 15 - 1 is meant to encourage timely settlement and resolution of litigation, including claims for costs.

This will no doubt be a disappointing decision for defendants who had welcomed Master James» earlier decision, which sought to encourage the usage of mediation where it was available rather than incurring considerable costs of litigation for low value quality complaints claims.

penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.

Encouraged by the results of the Vioxx litigation in the U.S., which proceeded by way of individual mass tort cases rather than a class action, Will Davidson LLP decided to take a similar approach for their 215 clients with claims arising from allegedly defective pelvic mesh devices.

Jean was exposed to every conceivable type of litigation, in every court system, from small claims court to the Supreme Court of Canada, and was even encouraged to take legal aid criminal cases.

Set against the Gosling decision, it is worth remembering the ideology as outlined by Lord Justice Jackson in his Review of Civil Litigation Costs - Final Report of December 2009, para 2.11: «On the basis of the material provided during the Costs Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigatiLitigation Costs - Final Report of December 2009, para 2.11: «On the basis of the material provided during the Costs Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigationlitigation.»

The statute was intended to help eliminate frivolous claims, thereby protecting bars and restaurants from aggressive litigation, and to encourage them to obtain liquor liability insurance.

«I fully accept that parties should be discouraged from rushing to litigation or arbitration and encouraged to discuss and negotiate claims.

Shifting the burden of proof is intended to encourage positive outcomes in a higher proportion of native title claims, either by consent or through litigation.