She has had a broad array of
litigation experiences on both sides of the docket.
Not exact matches
On the corporate
side our Baltimore
litigation lawyers are
experienced at administrative law matters, arbitration and mediation, business
litigation, civil appeals, contract disputes, cyber-law, environmental law, federal investigations, insurance law, real estate, tax prosecutions and IRS matters.
But that's not all, our lawyers also work with a wide variety of
litigation matters, so if you think you have a case, and need skill and
experience on your
side, just call us.
This has given us
experience on both
sides of the court and allows us to offer deeper, more insightful
litigation strategies to our clients.
In the case of a trial, it is important to make sure that you have an
experienced personal injury
litigation attorney
on your
side.
His practice areas and
experience cover commercial intellectual property advice, IP
litigation, advertising law and
litigation, advice
on drafting and / or negotiation of information technology agreements
on seller or buyer
side, and advice
on the protection and enforcement of trade mark, patent, copyright and industrial designs.
We also can help if you need an
experienced lawyer
on your
side with family law and
litigation issues.
«I have
experience on both
sides of the docket, which helps in building a
litigation strategy in collaboration with a client, whether I'm defending or prosecuting a claim.
Surely «extensive
experience in the conduct of
litigation» is just a proxy for what really matters and that there are individuals who can acquire the necessary (and rather different) skills of managing the conduct of
litigation as a judge without extensive
experience on the other
side of the bench as a litigator.
Having an
experienced litigation team
on your
side can be your key advantage in a car accident claim.
Meghan articled with Will Davidson LLP between July 2011 and June 2012 and gained extensive hands -
on experience in plaintiff -
side litigation; advocating for individuals in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and Small Claims Court.
So it was just a great learning
experience starting in
litigation but moving over onto the transactional
side, and understanding what can go wrong having seen it
on the
litigation side, by working and putting deals together
on the transactional
side.
A typical attorney who self - identifies as an «employee rights» attorney will usually have much more
experience (as compared to the typical attorney identified as an «employment attorney» or an «employer defense» attorney) with: (1) representing workers
on a contingency - fee basis (where no fee is paid unless the case wins or settles) and offering risk - sharing fee arrangements generally; (2) playing offense, so to speak — analyzing, identifying and prosecuting specific legal violations (whereas employer -
side attorneys tend to have more
experience in broader - stroke compliance / employer - training matters, and reactive work in
litigation that responds to claims they are presented); and (3) identifying with the «little guy» who has been harmed by a larger opponent, often having well - tested strategies that have worked while representing individuals against large organizations and wind up with good case results.
This data can not only help in - house lawyers identify winning outside counsel or help a law firm pitch it's
experience, but can also help lawyers
on both
sides make better strategic and tactical decisions during
litigation.
It has almost all of the characteristics of the adversarial
litigation system — counsel present
on both
sides, a process focused mainly
on resolving the substantive issues according to the statutory law and appellate decisions, and a third party neutral whose main
experience has been in deciding adversarial cases in an imposed process.