Sentences with phrase «litigation support products»

Ron Friedmann at Prism Legal reports on LexisNexis» continued expansion into litigation support products, with its recent acquisitions of CaseSoft and DataFlight.

At a recent webinar focused on an introduction to the LexisNexis ® Concordance ® litigation support product — a pioneering software tool that has been in the market for more than 20 years and now has more than 70,000 users — Jessica Solano, a litigation solutions architect for LexisNexis, walked attendees through five essentials that their discovery management software must be able to do efficiently in today's fast - paced eDiscovery workflow:

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

Here's a chilling prospect: «If you own a growing company and spend most of your time preoccupied with developing new products and markets, you're especially vulnerable to employee theft and fraud,» warns Thomas Creal, managing director of investigation and litigation support at the Chicago accounting firm of Checkers, Simon & Rosner.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; delays in the completion of project sales; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 27, 2017.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 20, 2016.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; cancelation of utility - scale feed - in - tariff contracts in Japan; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 27, 2017.

Many factors may cause differences between current expectations and actual results including unexpected safety or efficacy data observed during preclinical or clinical studies, clinical trial site activation or enrollment rates that are lower than expected, changes in expected or existing competition, changes in the regulatory environment, failure of Syndax's collaborators to support or advance collaborations or product candidates and unexpected litigation or other disputes.

Note: This is a guest post from Daryn Teague, who provides support to the litigation software product line based in the LexisNexis Raleigh Technology Center.

Just three products in the litigation support marketplace registered among respondents when asked what trial presentation tools they used in 2014: Trial Director, LexisNexis Sanction and TrialPad.

Two decades ago companies in the demonstrative - evidence and litigation support industry pioneered the use of technology to improve litigators» work product and reduce the cost of telling a compelling story to a jury.

This has allowed Todd to understand clients» engineering processes and product portfolios in support of patent prosecution and litigation matters.

He conducts Product and Technology Analysis, Patentability & Prior Art Research, and provides Technology & Litigation Support for Intellectual Property.

With litigation support tools, we might invest in one technology to assist with managing our evidence whether it is documents, transcripts, or work product developed based upon the evidence.

With over 10 years of experience in production management, project management, and litigation support technology, Karen works with clients and her team to ensure a quality product that will consistently meet or exceed client expectations.

· Personal Injury · Auto Accidents · Texting While Driving · Truck Accidents · Car Accidents · Motorcycle Accidents · Trucking Accidents · Personal Injury Litigation · Defective Product Injuries · Defective Products · Product Liability Accidents · Premises Liability · Slip and Fall Accidents · Medical Malpractice · Serious Injury · Nursing Home Abuse · Nursing Home Neglect · Wrongful Death · Criminal Defense · DUI · Drug Charges · Violent Crimes · Trafffic Violations · Family Law · Divorce · Legal Separation · Child Custody · Child Support

Denver, CO — January 25, 2017 — Catalyst has named Daniel Au Yeung, a veteran business leader with more than 20 years in the e-discovery and litigation support industry, to be head of product management, where he will oversee the planning, direction, definition, and communication of all software products.

The proliferation of personal computers has enabled lawyers to draft and edit documents, retrieve prior work product within and external to the firm, provide litigation support, avoid conflicts of interest, and maintain docket control and calendaring.

There are firms that specialize in Health Care litigation or Product Liability litigation that use litigation support services frequently.

Author: LawProspector is a firm that sells the LawProspector software - as - a-service product to litigation support sales professionals.

Author: Doug Austin is the Professional Services Manager for Houston - based Trial Solutions, a company that provides software products, electronic discovery services, computer forensics and litigation support.

We provide regulatory investigations and compliance counseling, litigation support, consumer protection counseling and business transaction assistance on a range of bitcoin and digital currency systems, services and products.

Note: This post is by Daryn Teague, who provides support to the litigation software product line based in the LexisNexis Raleigh Technology Center.

After searching for an existing product to meet our needs, we decided to create our own tool to fit the unique systems and processes of a litigation support company.

With more than 20 years of experience at major high - tech companies and in private practice, Jeff has supported a broad range of legal issues including, technology licensing, commercial transactions, commercial litigation, open source, product and M&A technology due diligence, as well as legal operations matters.

While the weight of case law supports litigation funding as ethically robust and protected under work product doctrine, many states have not issued any opinion on the matter.

Making the transition to a new product — whether firms choose the new version of Summation or one of its competitors — will be very expensive, since it may require deploying new hardware and it will certainly involve a significant investment in moving data, integrating it with other applications and processes, training technology support staff in how to manage it, and training litigation support staff, as well as lawyers and law clerks, in how to use it.

The Early Data Analyzer (EDA) product is a high speed processing and culling tool allows litigation support to take eDiscovery data and cull it down before moving onto the next step, such as processing or production.

This week's EDD industry news from LTN online includes a new e-discovery president at Daegis, a litigation support provider and an attorney review firm joining forces, product improvements at AccessData, and another law firm adopting Relativity.

The product is an electronic discovery, litigation document management, and litigation support tool.

This a guest post by Daryn Teague, who provides support to the litigation software product line based in the LexisNexis Raleigh Technology Center.

The practice's recent representations include: (i) CONMEBOL in connection with U.S. criminal investigations and prosecutions into allegations of bribery and corruption in the international soccer world; (ii) the Special Committee of Banco BTG Pactual S.A. («BTG Pactual») in an internal investigation of alleged corruption involving its former CEO and other bank executives, in which we found no basis to support the allegations against the Bank and its employees; (iii) two of the largest construction companies in Brazil in potential civil and criminal investigations and litigation involving the Petrobras bribery scandal (Lava Jato), the largest corruption scandal in Latin American history, involving allegations of over $ 2.5 billion in bribes and kickbacks; (iv) the Government of Brazil in a corruption matter involving former senior government officials and multiple jurisdictions; (v) the General Manager of one of the largest energy companies in Central America in connection with allegations of bribery in Guatemala; (vi) a Mexican high - ranking executive for Wal - Mart Stores, Inc. in connection with DOJ and SEC FCPA investigations against Wal - Mart; (vii) a large Argentinean oil company and its owner, one of Argentina's wealthiest individuals, in connection with high - profile DOJ and SEC investigations involving alleged FCPA violations to secure an extension of oil rights in an Argentinean oilfield; (viii) the United State's largest chemical and industrial products companies in an internal investigation of alleged corruption involving its Mexican subsidiary; (ix) the Rosenthal family, one of the most prominent families in Central America, in a number of related criminal matters; and (x) a senior executive of one of Venezuela's largest engineering companies in DOJ investigations into corruption and money laundering involving PdVSA.

We support strong litigation reforms that include shifting attorneys» fees to the losing party in certain cases to discourage abusive patent claims; ensuring a balanced and fair discovery process that addresses excessive discovery costs; and requiring greater specificity in pleading of patent claims and infringing products in patent litigation.

Expert Consultant & Witness — Litigation Support Services Dr. Acklin provides expert consultation in civil and criminal proceedings, including case and file reviews, psychological research, work product reviews, witness preparation, and trial consultation, including assistance in the direct...