Sentences with phrase «little cgi»

Personally, I think they make the game look pretty great and the little CGI segments at the beginning are super cute!

Online comparisons reveal that the unrated cut adds a little CGI gore and some violent sounds (breaking bones, stabs).

Released recently in UK Cinema's, Call of Heroes (2016), proves to be one of the best recent Hong Kong action films released in the past few years, focusing more on good acting, excellent action sequences and as little CGI as...

The special effects, especially the cave - in sequence, are very impressive and, according to Riggen, used very little CGI work to create.

Peppered with B - roll, the piece, in addition to legitimizing Woo's claim that he used very little CGI, finds a post-Kill Bill Thurman amusingly declaring herself «an amateur stunt man (italics ours).»

And there's very little CGI in it.

(As a nod to technology, just a little CGI is incorporated for certain scenes that would be hard to do in Plasticine, as when the vacuumed bunnies are in free - fall).

Personally, I think they make the game look pretty great and the little CGI segments at the beginning are super cute!

All in all, well crafted, surprisingly well acted, and at times breath - taking Irish landscapes helped by only a little CGI.

Throw in a little cgi and grade - school level machinations that don't fit and you've got a movie with an appeal that is only for the very young or very stupid.

It's beautiful but desolate, making it the perfect backdrop for «Fury Road» — especially because the movie used as little CGI and green screen as possible.

Not exact matches

Marvel's notorious, bombastic, CGI'd finales always end a little too clean, with little resolution for character arcs.

Luckily for Mike Myers, these movies require very little of him dramatically — since Shrek is Mike Myers plus a big green CGI body.

Mr. Popper's Penguins uses a mix of live animals and CGI, but the animals, despite a little creative license, behave like the animals they were born to be and not some pipsqueak, wiseacre humans.

But the great leaps forward in CGI don't necessarily make for better movies, and Shrek the Third comes across as a little tired and uncertain, introducing a parade of new characters that seem more like distractions and diversions than significant figures.

CGI was very good, many little surprises.

Shots of the moon, moving vehicles, the lunar surface and of course Little America just look average and obviously CGI.

Alas I was disappointed hugely by yet another loud CGI filled mess which was overly long and actually became a little dull.

Adding to the confusion are a few scattered CGI effects that can be detected with very little difficulty and some fairly erratic cinematography that includes headache - inducing handheld shots and scenes that are so poorly lit that it looks as if the sets were illuminated with a 40 - watt light bulb.

In an era when people go see films mainly for CGI explosions, the ending pulls of a neat little cinematic scene.

Brolin's choice may come as somewhat of a surprise, given that most actors tend to prefer on - set, practical roles such as that of Cable as opposed to largely green - screen, CGI / motion capture work that requires little time actually on - set.

The CGI used on The Thing was completely hideous and I kind of miss the 2005 Thing a little bit.

And maybe squint a little so you're less distracted by the CGI.

Much like the Hobbits in the Lord of the Rings films, most of the main elves are played by actors who are rather tall, but shortened thanks to a great deal of CGI work (pretty much utilizing Little Man's copy - paste head technique, only less effectively).

Often, all - CGI cities can get exhausting to look at — as T'Challa and his ex-girlfriend (and Wakandan intelligence agent) Nakia (a luminous Lupita Nyong» o) walk around Wakanda, packed with flying cars and massive buildings next to food stalls and street vendors, one finds oneself wishing we learned just a little bit more about the day - to - day life there.

The drawback is that Kunis never seems to actually buy into the mythos and world that were supposed to come out of all the green screen and CGI work; Tatum, by comparison, seems to be deep into a drama that feels out of place in a big popcorn film, and his character has little humor or charm underneath the brooding, gruff attitude, campy facial prosthetics and drag - style makeup work.

Wounded by the overwhelmingly baffled reaction to his tale of deadly pollen, and crippled by his growing reputation as an ultra-sensitive yet ham - fisted megalomaniac auteur, Shyamalan threw in the towel — trading his usual suspense for the generic CGI of The Last Airbender and After Earth — but it was too little too late.

«The Little Prince» features both CGI (the world of The Little Girl, The Mother and The Aviator) and stop - motion animation (The Little Prince's literary adventures).

But Hemsworth doesn't merely slap on an eye patch and step in front of cameras; Thor's new look in the ensemble film requires a little bit of CGI magic.

Insurgent, part two in the latest «three books as four movies» franchise, ups the ante on action, but delivers little more than some flashy CGI amid a formula growing increasingly tiresome.

Naturally, the monsters in 2011 are mostly CGI, and of course this is a little disappointing.

Little is known about the film beyond those broad details, but it'll be interesting to see how or even if his time in the world of titanic CGI spectacle informs the newer, presumably more personal work.

I agree this film was very good and will contend on the CGI and motion capture pieces alone, but I did find the human acting a little on the average side rather than the extraordinaire.

In this film publicity image released by Universal Pictures, Gru, voiced by Steve Carell, tells his minions about their new mission to steal the moon in the 3 - D CGI feature, «Despicable Me,» about a villain who meets his match in three little girls.

Even though some of the CGI looked a little cheesy, overall the 1080p transfer packed that certain 300» style feel but more on a direct - to - video standard.

The rest of the supporting cast (including Stellan Skarsgard and Idris Elba) does fine as well, though Eccleston is given precious little to do other than snarl menacingly beneath layers of makeup and CGI, and Anthony Hopkins seems vaguely dyspeptic at the very thought of having to play Odin again.

While some of the images are visually striking, little of the film is actually aesthetically pleasing due to the use of composite imaging and CGI.

Too much CGI; too little story development (not to mention the conclusion which felt a lot like «National Treasure: Book of Secrets.»)

It uses CGI about as convincingly as the old - school movies applies optical effects, just a little off and artificial, barely a step up from SyFy original movies, but always reaching for something unexpected.

So what could have been a Werner Herzog - quoting battle of futility against the forces of nature, couched in myth but disguised in tentpole blockbuster scale, becomes an episodic series of CGI - disasters with little shape beyond its adherence to the «facts» of the matter.

It is, perhaps, tempting to dismiss Steven Spielberg's «Ready Player One» as little more than an exercise in crowd - pleasing nostalgia mining, a CGI - addled romp through the pop culture universe that Spielberg himself is, in part, responsible for...

Its motion - capture CGI renders the characters in rubbery, apple - cheeked versions that sometimes slide queasily into the uncanny valley; its script (written by the dream team of Doctor Who show - runner Steven Moffat, Hot Fuzz writer - director Edgar Wright, and Attack The Block writer - director Joe Cornish) is an of - the - moment action movie, little more than a lengthy series of big setpieces, crammed with fights and chases.

The 11 - foot CGI Hulk may look a little cartoonish, the addition of rabid Hulk dogs is downright lame, and the use of comic book panel editing is an acquired taste, but it still looks and feels like a superhero movie, even if it didn't turn out exactly the way we wanted it to.

There are some other problems as Showman unspools, perhaps the most obvious being the weird and unconvincing CGI used to make already - tiny actor Sam Humphrey appear to be even smaller as Tom Thumb, Barnum's show's resident little person — it looks like he's awkwardly walking on his knees throughout, and he occasionally appears then disappears from group musical numbers.

The few who did take an interest in the movie wondered if the low - key approach Disney took to marketing and exhibiting its film had something to do with the studio maintaining properties nearer and dearer to its heart, namely its long - promoted in - house fully - CGI debut Chicken Little and the increasingly optimistic negotiations with Pixar.

In fact, Michael Myers is such a great evil figure because although we know his back - story, we essentially see so little of him that we can create the monster in our own imagination; a much scarier world than that any Hollywood prosthetics of CGI could ever create.

The only thing that I'm a little bit worried about after seeing the trailer is the use of CGI.

-- then drops them in little flurries of poor CGI and cheap gross - outs that feel embarrassed despite their front - and - centre placement.

PETER FARRELLY: There was a little talk about doing it with CGI, but that wouldn't have looked good, so he eventually took it off.

It is apparent that a large portion of the $ 90 US million budget went towards the CGI, and perhaps this makes the film feel a little cramped at times.