The public face knows very
little about the science and the scientists know very little about how their work will be represented.
People who know
little about the science want to lead the discussion to science instead of being happy to discuss on issues they understand as well as scientists.
And goodly Archbishop Rowan Williams, who self - evidently understands
little about the science, has warned of «millions, billions» of deaths as a result of global warming and threatened Mr Blair with the wrath of the climate God unless he acts.
It's a terrific concept, at least to me, who knows
little about the science or product specs.
Now allow me to talk
a little about the science behind the global warming frenzy.
In addition to the «free roaming experience», the The Discovery Tour by Assassin's Creed: Ancient Egypt will also offer guided tours that focus on different aspects of that time period (the Great Pyramids, the mummification, Cleopatra, Temples and priests, Daily life etc) and also
a little about the science of Egyptology and how the team integrated this into the immersive world.
Macron has made the environment a leading issue in his campaign, but has said relatively
little about science policy so far.
You appear to know
little about science.
Perhaps YOU should learn
a little about science before posting?
Nearly all the atheists posting here who hold science up like it is a religion know very
little about science.
It's not evolutionary «THEORY» with no proof... Read
a little about science, there is proof about evolution all around us... And to «This Again»?
Obviously, you know
little about science.
Wow, you sure know very
little about science.
Not exact matches
(Interestingly, other
science shows something similar
about stress — too
little can be as problematic as too much.
«I am one of the only students with a
science background who also has significant startup experience, so I think that brings a very different view to our case discussions when we talk
about making decisions using very
little data,» she said.
Or perhaps you can pause for a moment and think
about all the paranormal activity that goes on from UFO's to ghosts and spirits and you will realize that
science does not have all the answers and there is
little more to life than what society will have you believe.
Instead, they find
little stupid convoluted reasons to justify their actual views on the matter that reality - based
science is actually a real cure to things we know
about (thanks to the scientific method) when in fact religion offers nothing but wishful thinking.
The
little dialogue raises some points worth considering, not
about the
science, though Taylor can't resist the usual demeaning smear of dissenting scientists as «the small vociferous minority.»
JDJ, «Smart» isn't learning
science from your preacher, or from a book written thousands of years ago by men who know relatively
little about the natural world.
Read a
little bit
about science, or go back to school, before you make unqualified comments like this.
He viewed
science as a way to learn deeper truths
about God, arguing that «a
little philosophy inclines man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy brings men's minds
about to religion.»
Much has been written
about science and religion in general, but
little has appeared to help scientists find Christian meaning in their jobs as scientists.
Just as physics reveals
little of significance
about man until one reflects on the enterprises of
science and technology, so scientific psychology, aiming to out - do physics in objective rigor, can yield
little insight
about man until the distinctive human quality of self - awareness is acknowledged as an essential factor in psychological inquiry.
Is it possible and after reading
about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think
about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in
science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a
little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result
Your expose on
science shows just
about how
little of
science you know.
Science is true, god was created by people including scientists who could not be able to explains things when we knew so
little about the earth and the universe.
All
Science proves is how
little we know
about who God is and how much more we need to learn and understand who God is.
Today I kick off a short, three - post series
about science and faith with a
little summary of what I learned at the BioLogos Foundation conference last week.
A Serpent's Thought... it looks like you need to go open a
science book a learn a
little about life then.
He knows very
little about theology, and absolutely nothing
about the supreme physical and computational
sciences.
When I learn a
little about philosophy and
science, I became an atheist.
In fact, process philosophers have written relatively
little about ethics in general; their major contributions to contemporary philosophy, like those of Whitehead himself, have been in the areas of metaphysics, philosophy of
science, and philosophy of religion.1
First, while there is
little in the Bible that could be called
science, the book of Genesis is very clear
about where the universe came from.
Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a Big bang occurred, we know so
little about the universe, that we don't even know everything
about our own world, and you really believe that our
science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?
To demonstrate how exactly Diedrich IR roasters achieve this remarkable feat, we need to get a
little nerdy and talk
about science.
Sourdough is a
science for sure, but I'm starting to get a
little overly passionate
about it.
Although it's not rocket
science, making cold brew is a
little more complicated than pouring water over a batch of beans and forgetting
about it.
Well, the above comment may come
about as of
little logic and as if from one unlearned, especially in
science.
It's not rocket
science and frankly im suprised the article even asks thequestion Pundits, fans and anyone who knows even a
little about football can realise arsenal lack a physical / quality spine — cb, dm and striker.
The billion dollar question is, now that the CTE genie is out of the bottle, will efforts to correct the record and repair the disconnect between the
science and the media
about the disease be a case of too
little, too late?
Kitchens are full of
science, from the biology of yeast making pizza dough rise to growing salt crystals (sugar crystals are fun too, but a
little tougher to make work) and learning
about starch!
Unlike the Field Museum or
Science & Industry, there's a sense of intimacy
about our
little museum.
A child who has been labeled as a «
little scientist,» may not pursue his interest in music because he thinks he's only supposed to be passionate
about science - related activities.
Optimistic faith in
science required
little reasoning
about why formula feeding was equal to - if not better than - breast milk.
About seven minutes later, apparently our basement full of toys became completely uninteresting, and three
little people carrying a
science experiment book confronted me.
A
little about me, I am a microbiology major and I love all things
science.
I was looking for
science and, as you pointed out, found
little — but I also found it disturbing that the AAFP wasn't up front
about that.
One thing
about which there can be
little controversy: a need to encourage ever more K - 12 students to embrace
science and engineering.
It is not clear which flavour of research Trump will favour, in part because he has said
little publicly
about science before or after the election.
Evangelicals have lower
science education and participation rates than the general population, suffer from a strain of anti-intellectualism within their ranks, are not always well served by a commitment to revelation over discovery, and possess undue trust in religious leaders — particularly in areas
about which those leaders generally have
little expertise, he said.