Sentences with phrase «little argument about»

secondly, your little argument about «little kids» is alittle contradicting considering that you included «braid» in your exclusive «tripple aaa» line up list.

There is little argument about the fact that convertibles are more fun to drive than traditional sedans and coupes.

Chelsea's David Luiz has been a big talking point, having fallen down the pecking order since a fall - out with coach Antonio Conte, and with his replacement Andrea Christensen thoroughly impressing in his place, you can have little argument about his exclusion.

When it comes to actual practice, we may depart from this standard rather markedly, but there is little argument about the principle.

I can tell that Dan is anxious, and I find myself conducting little arguments about the age of the earth in my head.

Not exact matches

It's a little harder to deal with the haters who attack whenever you write something positive, or even whenever you write anything at all about Apple, because their arguments aren't entirely incorrect or unsympathetic.

The fact that you resort to petty little insults shows the depth of your character and arguments, which are about as shallow as a drop of water in an empty pool.

To put forth such an argument shows just how little the commenter knows about the dynamics of the human species.

Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»?

Having seen scientists get precious about little things, I would invent my own term and avoid all argument that way.

has about it something of a demand for a pedigree, which might at least lend some credibility to the claims Christ makes for himself; for want of which, Pilate can do little other than pronounce his truth: «I have power to crucify thee» (which, to be fair, would under most circumstances be an incontrovertible argument).

Some of the readings are little gems: Justin Moser's 1772 warning about the dangers associated with «Diminished Disgrace of Whores and Their Children in Our day»; T. E. Hulme's «Essays on War» (1916), which respond to Bertrand Russell's arguments for pacifism; and Winston Churchill's «Speech on Rebuilding the House of Commons» (1943), a remarkable critique of «rationalism in politics» by a Burkean - minded statesman.

Perhaps if you knew a little more about what the Church was about, then you would at least be in a position to throw actual stones (i.e., reasoned theological or sociological arguments against the Church).

Not only is this disassociation apparent but it seems to leave theology particularly exposed; for while the metaphysician may be criticised for paying insufficient attention to empirical enquiry, and the natural scientist too little to abstract argument about ultimate principles, at least both appear to be directed towards describing the structure of things: metaphysical and natural, respectively.

Let us examine these arguments and worry a little about the kind of language - structure within which they are presumed to be formulated.

Do not make claims of certainty for arguments you know very little about.

Consequently, this argument contributes very little either toward defending the cognitive significance of Stapp's proof or toward clarifying the status of the unknowable spin values with which the proof deals; the same can be said of his argument defending the general significance of talk about possibilities.

Fabiani doesn't make any arguments about keeping the city's local economy strong or make an easy play at the fans» little brother complex toward L.A..

Looked liked Hughton had a little argument with Klopp at the end of the game, I wonder what that was all about?

I do believe that Gazidis was weak and done very little to convince Silent Stan that the issues was the managers fault, Wenger has been able to turn around and point to poor transfer activity from the board to result in a poor team for him to manage, for someone who isn't deeply understanding about football then Wengers arguments could sound equally valid.

However, the club has spent on players; we can have an argument about the type and quality of players, but the fact remains we brought in players and sold little, if any.

There's also the category systemthat was set up by the club, which kind of sends the argument about «sucking it up» a little less palatable.

The nature versus nurture argument about personality has always seemed a little futile to me.

These arguments, however, explain very little about the actual content of the deals.

The argument about what he said, is little different Labour Knew about Lord Paul and did sod all taking the money.

There is little political argument about the theory of universal credit.

I particularly liked Stuart's observation that contemporary politics is keen on the «choice» side of luck egalitarian argument but tends to little or nothing about the correction of brute luck.

The argument against Corbyn isn't about his personal image and manner though, it's that he'd put the Labour party in a ideological and policy position that wouldn't win votes, that the Labour party itself would risk ripping itself apart under a leader with little support among the Parliamentary party and a long history of rebellion.

Cameron gets a little vague, and repeats his argument about political will.

Our argument throughout trial was about other things, but in our view that could be mucked up a little bit because of these decisions.

The last thread seems to have very little discussion about polls and lots of partisan argument, so I thought it time for an open thread.

I have become a little bit of a librarian in my immediate family, able to sort out arguments about when somebody's birthday is or when a bill came in, for example.

Despite the clear arguments for controlling parasitic infections, we know surprisingly little about the developmental processes in parasitic nematodes.

«There's a whole other side of the argument that has little to do with safety and a lot more to do with how we think about children and whether we should be in the business of genetically modifying generations at all,» Mathews said.

Little argument is given about the detrimental effects of eating «safe starches» and glucose spikes on raising insulin, and resultant insulin resistance, with the exception of the (very poor) study that compared people eating a standard American diet to those eating a controlled, very high fiber (22 tablespoons!)

But even then, there are arguments about how much unprocessed food is okay to eat, and granted, «most of the time» is a little ambiguous.

So, there is little public argument about God and nature in «Creation,» no actual manifestation of the intellectual and spiritual tumult his theories would inspire.

What's most stunning about the anecdotes recounted by Dick's interviewees is how alike they are, and if his film doesn't delve quite deeply enough into the type of culture that breeds such conduct (specifically, the way in which the army projects strength as a masculine trait, thereby subconsciously disparaging female victimhood as an undesirable weakness), its spartan use of graphics and statistics conveys arguments with little grandstanding.

Autodefensa has elements of a populist uprising, and the grisly sights of such things as heads of decapitated victims lined up like ducks in a shooting gallery or a woman's story about the barbarous murder of a little child can not help but win sympathy for their argument for self - defense — especially when the Mexican government is, at best, ineffective when it comes to protecting its citizens.

But whether she's working closely with her editors or she's leaving them little choice in how to cut her films because of how lean her scripts and footage are, this kind of short, snappy, collage - like approach to storytelling has become Gerwig's «style» — which undercuts the argument that there's nothing distinctive about the way her movies look and feel.

Also, I thought I had made it abundantly clear that the main reason I want online implemented in all of the aforementioned games is so I can play with FRIENDS, so your argument about only playing with complete strangers online has little to no merit.

Far more compelling arguments can be made not about how much Common Core matters, but how little.

While this new data may put a crimp in the teachers unions» argument, they are sure to keep complaining about that 17 percent, and cite as reasons: poor pay, a good economy, the Koch Brothers, a bad economy, ALEC, too much testing, too little respect, corporate ed reform, etc..

What makes the report so curious is that they actually accept four facts about the Common Core that leave little of their argument intact.

However, Alabama School Superintendent Tommy Bice disagreed with Beason's efforts and urged against it, noting that Beason's argument has little to do with academics and is more about politics (Alabama, 2014).

I think the «professionals» that do the test drives are so diluted with the massive range of cars trucks SUV's etc that they drive they loose the ability to fine tune what matters to the specific group of people into this type of car... Also there is a lot of room in the front seat - seems to have endless adjustment to it - I am a huge guy 6» 3 and 250 pounds and just to feel like the Santa fe I have to have the seat upwards, I will slowly adjust this back as I get used to the car... Also no one wants to discuss the arguments about the 19 inch wheels adding a little to the ground clearance - an engineer showed me this huge equation that in the end said it added 1.45 inches... who knows... But I am impressed with the power, I thought it was slightly bigger and more powerful that the CX - 5 and handled just as good maybe better off regular roads....

Things have exploded in the argument of traditional publishing versus self - publishing versus agent publishing versus using those little gray guys at Area 51 publish you... The key for a writer is to sort through all the facts, opinions and flat out lies being thrown about, figure out their own situation, decide where they want to be as an author in the future, and then smartly and courageously choose their own path.

At the risk of sounding all Tin Foil Hattish, the Jarod Laniers http://www.amazon.com/Who-Owns-Future-Jaron-Lanier/dp/1451654960 and others who discuss the collection of customer information and how that dominates the focus at Amazon, Google and others make a good argument for how little we understand about what motivates the giant companies who control access to information and connections in our lives.

After all, people don't want to buy eReader (be it eInk or not), people don't care about whether format is open or not (although 1984 argument may scare some people, in reality eBooks are little different from paper books in this regard for all practical purposes).

I have little confidence that these investors will beat the market consistently, but you could make the same argument about many of the overpriced ETFs and index funds available in Canada.