Sentences with phrase «little argument from»

That his party is seen as amorphous gets little argument from Bernardo.

Not exact matches

Whether the $ 175 price increase on a car is «no big deal» may vary by your income and perspective, but many pundits are pointing out the argument falls a little flat coming from this Republican administration.

A populist who inspires so little enthusiasm from actual voters that he drops out before the first ballot gets cast probably isn't the man to improve Mitt Romney's numbers with blue - collar voters in Ohio and Michigan — and absent that qualification, the argument for picking Pawlenty mostly evaporates.

I am frankly sick of you people asking for one to show you this and that, and when we do, its called «foul» «circ = ular argument» and all the other little fancy terms you scr - ape up from your «God is Dirt.

Without carpets on the floor, with screams of command from the guards regularly punctuating the atmosphere, and with small three - men cells as the locus of ongoing physical tensions and arguments (homosexual rape is a scandalously regular form of violence), jail offers little opportunity for stillness and peace.

When it comes to actual practice, we may depart from this standard rather markedly, but there is little argument about the principle.

If the argument here is correct, the two developments result from some of the same causes: The American kind of church - state separation meant no church monopolized religious symbols; courts were called upon to articulate ultimate purpose and justice; and judges felt little ambivalence in doing so.

@HawaiiGuest «This statement in your little skit is an argument from ignorance.

However, he's still managed to score 10 goals and provide two assists, as an argument could be made that he has deserved a little more faith from Conte to feature more regularly and prove his worth to the Blues.

I do believe that Gazidis was weak and done very little to convince Silent Stan that the issues was the managers fault, Wenger has been able to turn around and point to poor transfer activity from the board to result in a poor team for him to manage, for someone who isn't deeply understanding about football then Wengers arguments could sound equally valid.

Basically, although there was little understandable speech coming from her end, and there was no yelling, she and I were having a rather heated argument!

I think the sign off from CRA above says it all... Just like when you read a voter ballot on propositions, I go straight to the source of who is behind the voice, and CRA consistently has used this «trace» argument time and again, just like the chem companies do with the lead in lipstick (I just attended the Teens Turning Green national summit, and found the debriefing almost verbatim to the CRA «counterpoint» above... it's only a «little» lead, not enough to... blahdeblah, times «x» amounts of applications per day times «x» amounts of other products with «trace» amounts, ad infinitum...)

From little kids to the teenagers, try to stay positive with them and avoid any type of negativity, from fights to arguments to overstepping your authorFrom little kids to the teenagers, try to stay positive with them and avoid any type of negativity, from fights to arguments to overstepping your authorfrom fights to arguments to overstepping your authority.

For the sake of argument, let's also assume that a pack of microfiber cloth boosters from the dollar store should be on our list, not only for heavy - wetting, but to make sure we're keeping the little one feeling as dry and comfortable as possible at night (no one wants wetness to wake a baby up).

So often we don't want to take the time to dig a little deeper, thinking that it's too time consuming, yet arguments can linger over the rest of the day, creating a pall over what should be a loving day of connection and respite from our busy lives.

Since Jose Antonio Vargas's original report that only Ron Paul and John McCain had so far agreed to participate in the September Republican version of last week's CNN / YouTube debate, plenty of folks on the left, right and center have dogpiled on the candidates, lacerating defenders» arguments and leaving me with little doubt that Romney, Giuliani, et al will ultimately grudgingly deign to take questions from The Common Man.

The argument sounds a little more plausible and reasonable on the surface but it's just one small step up from blaming women for wearing skirts and generally provoking men's lust (which incidentally is not necessarily the main motivation of rape).

I understand Long's argument from an intellectual standpoint, but it's still probably going to strike some people as a little strange.

On the other hand, the fact that the case is already so far in the public domain might be evidence that arguments used by m» learned friends to try and stuff it back into the obscurity from which it sprang are little more than legal tosh and nonsense.

The problem with this argument is that it would do little to help taxpayers in the North towns who are burdened by additional property taxes to cover the costs of so - called chargebacks from Niagara County Community College (NCCC).

In a 90 - minute closing argument, Christopher P. Conniff, a defense lawyer, told jurors that the case against State Senator Dean G. Skelos and his son, Adam, amounted to little more than distractions, snippets of conversations taken out of context, and self - serving lies from two central witnesses.

... the argument that occasional transfer of these particular resistance genes from GM plants to bacteria would pose an unacceptable risk to human or animal health has little substance.

There is little argument that as men age their testosterone levels gradually drop, and that men with the lowest testosterone levels tend to suffer from more depression, foggy thinking, low libido, erectile dysfunction, low muscle mass, and an increased risk of heart disease.

• Loss of sex drive • Frequent colds • Eating more or less • Sleeping too much or too little • Isolating yourself from others • Procrastination, neglecting responsibilities • Using alcohol, cigarettes, drugs to relax • Nervous habits (e.g. nail biting, pacing) • Teeth grinding or jaw clenching • Overdoing activities (exercise, shopping) • Overreacting to unexpected problems • Picking fights or arguments with others

You never see the «dignity» argument from sugar babies for broke sugar daddies who can afford very little in terms of allowances.

You can feel every argument swiftly brewing just from the precise angle of Ronan's gaze, out of a car window, or the shades of pugnacity and indignation a peerless Metcalf can broadcast using little more than her chin.

With a little over a month to go before its release, Walt Disney Pictures has debuted the first clip from Into the Woods, which sees The Witch (Meryl Streep) interrupting an argument between The Baker (James Corden) and his wife (Emily Blunt) and issuing a threat to the couple.

So for me, the argument scene between Stephen Strange and Christine Palmer, that fight scene in the apartment — even to this day, every time I watch the movie, it feels like, «How did I get this scene from this gritty little indie film into this Marvel movie?»

Setting aside the argument that it's never too late to humanize a dangerous man (if, in fact, that's the point the series is trying to make), the caricature of Donald Trump presented in the series is so oafishly relatable he does little to resemble our very real and very dangerous president (aside from a decent impression from voice actor Jeff Bergman).

Secondly, the deposed leader Joanna craves power, and Walter manipulates her by giving her little pieces of power by seemingly let her win arguments — these dialogue scenes from writer Paul Rudnick are nicely done.

Notably, the best evidence for the weakness of the union's position came from the court's liberal bloc of Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Ginsburg, who made little effort to dispute the plaintiff's First Amendment arguments.

If I was in the market for a sporty two - door to help me commute mindlessly to and from work, while offering a little something extra for weekend road trips, then the Infiniti makes a compelling argument against, say, an equivalent BMW 4 series.

Temeraire could disagree, very vehemently, but when Iskierka had chivvied a few of her crew — newly brought on in Madras — into bringing up the sea - chests from below, and throwing open the lids to let the sunlight in upon the heaped golden vessels, and even one small casket of beautifully cut gemstones, he found his arguments did ring a little hollow.

After all, people don't want to buy eReader (be it eInk or not), people don't care about whether format is open or not (although 1984 argument may scare some people, in reality eBooks are little different from paper books in this regard for all practical purposes).

Some graphical shortcomings and a campaign that ends perhaps a little prematurely keep the game from achieving perfection, but Pikmin 3 serves as a compelling argument for purchasing a Wii U, and a fantastic experience that anyone can enjoy.

The most stupid argument ever is that «oh i have to get my lazy butt up from the sofa», maybe the nerds need that little workout and should buy games in retail stores.

A text that is almost entirely, rather than only momentarily, diagnostic in orientation is Barbara Rose's excellent, and unfortunately little remembered, «The Value of Didactic Art» of 1967, which ambitiously lays out the terms of a particular shift where works of art — those inheritors of the precedent of Duchamp's unassisted readymade — began to derive their value and significance from visually presenting a particular argument, rather than by engaging the viewer in primarily aesthetic terms, which this didactic art rendered at best marginal or incidental.

In a phone chat, he said that arguments about specific levels of climate sensitivity, or specific goals for carbon dioxide concentrations, have little meaning as long as the world is not slowing down from its accelerating path on emissions.

As the science blogger James Hrynyshyn put it last year (responding to a similar Wall Street Journal piece), there's little merit in the argument that scientific disagreement (a normal part of the scientific process) undermines the basic findings pointing to substantial risks from unabated emissions of greenhouse gases.

Since the statistical minutia have pushed the argument about how and why the models have difficulty in emulating the equatorial troposphere to the limit of intelligibility for all save systems programmers and sonde jockeys, I am perversely grateful to Halliday for exporting his contribution to the noise here from RC — with so little non-specialist sigmnal, it's been hard enough to follow as is.

One little sentence and you still couldn't get away from Argument from Authority!

But just like many of the arguments from professional climate science denialists, what at first might appear a cinematic coup d'état turns out to be little more than fakery and stage management.

Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking data and falsely generalizing, bringing up irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision» from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutorial - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.

And even if it is an «argument from authority,» if by «authority» you mean «expert,» I see little problem with it, particularly when someone like yourself is clearly not informed but has a hammer - headed opinion anyway — you honestly don't see that in yourself?

But implicit in this splicing - is - ok argument, is that seemingly the catastrophists also now believe the entire rise of temperature from the little ice age is manmade!

I must say, responses to the simple idea of a time lag from solar forcing were sometimes not reasonable, considered, or rational, although the worst responses were from bloggers with little understanding of the arguments, rather than moderators who were at least partly informed of the details.

The problem I have with the «coming out of the Little Ice Age» argument (apart from the lack of any actual mechanism) is that it is now much warmer than before the LIA started.

However, their arguments are underpinned by findings that are gaining more and more acceptance from independent science: solar activity is weakening considerably — to an extent that was last seen several hundred years ago, the Little Ice Age, according to scientists.»

Though BilB is perhaps a little harsh on our friend John Dawson the Ayn Rand connection does explain a lot about where his arguments come from.

Carvin did forcefully make some First Amendment arguments, but, in doing so, too often failed to observe that various opinions were not only permitted, but reasonable... Because Steyn and National Review have parted ways, Carvin and National Review seem to have been unaware of the long backstory and more or less presented the dispute (from National Review's perspective) as little more than a purely academic controversy over the validity of tree rings as a temperature proxy, leaving the judges completely mystified on why Mann, as opposed to any one of hundreds of scientists, was at issue.