Sentences with phrase «little argument with»

If that's all you're claiming when you say the debate is over, then I have little argument with you.

There can be little argument with the quality of the works; but there is, to put it mildly, a lot to take in

There can be little argument with the idea that securing a large loan with bad credit is a challenge.

While there is little argument with this in theory, there can be ambivalence amongst teachers when it comes to research.

Looked liked Hughton had a little argument with Klopp at the end of the game, I wonder what that was all about?

We all have little arguments with our partner from time to time.

Not exact matches

It's a little harder to deal with the haters who attack whenever you write something positive, or even whenever you write anything at all about Apple, because their arguments aren't entirely incorrect or unsympathetic.

There's little argument that opioids are overprescribed in the United States, but it can still be challenging for some Americans to get the medication after their prescriptions run out, especially with increased scrutiny of late.

Facebook's own argument for the protections it now has in place is a sign of its too - little, too - late response to a problem it created for itself with its initial policies.

A populist who inspires so little enthusiasm from actual voters that he drops out before the first ballot gets cast probably isn't the man to improve Mitt Romney's numbers with blue - collar voters in Ohio and Michigan — and absent that qualification, the argument for picking Pawlenty mostly evaporates.

It's an argument I've been making for years, with little success: Social observers in general and religious folk in particular vastly overestimate the influence of the news and entertainment media.

Of course they may end up disagreeing with Bernard of Clairvaux, Augustine, and Barth about the moral significance of our being created male and female, but shouldn't they be a little less sanguine about it and a little more deferential, to the point of saying, «We believe the tradition made a grave mistake in its disallowance of gay partnerships, but at the same time we acknowledge our deep indebtedness to that tradition for giving us the theological and ethical vision to even make our argument for inclusion»?

No need to believe in God for this little verse to apply Proverbs 26: 4 - 7 4 When arguing with fools, don't answer their foolish arguments, or you will become as foolish as they are.

But such arguments make little headway with socialists, says Novak, because, contrary to appearances, socialism is not really a practical political proposal at all.

There is little need for delusion... and in my experience, our delusions were shattered many times over... so we that are older tend to just ignore the argument of positioning «Holding beliefs lightly» with «Deluding Oneself».

FYI, just wanted to let you know that your comment of «If little Ricky has another side beside trying to legislate his version of «morality» and his moronic obsession with gays and his anti-gay hysteria -» feeds the author's argument.

For Prof. Smolin to suggest that Arkes is somehow «digging joint graves for the nation and [the pro-life movement]» only goes to prove how little acquainted he is with the argument of the book or with the beneficial impact of Arkes» persuasive powers.

Moreover, as Eric Chevlen notes, self - interest often interferes with moral reasoning, and if one is already interested in the contraceptive way of life, one may not be open to Humanae Vitae for reasons that have little to do with the strength of its arguments.

Without carpets on the floor, with screams of command from the guards regularly punctuating the atmosphere, and with small three - men cells as the locus of ongoing physical tensions and arguments (homosexual rape is a scandalously regular form of violence), jail offers little opportunity for stillness and peace.

Some of the readings are little gems: Justin Moser's 1772 warning about the dangers associated with «Diminished Disgrace of Whores and Their Children in Our day»; T. E. Hulme's «Essays on War» (1916), which respond to Bertrand Russell's arguments for pacifism; and Winston Churchill's «Speech on Rebuilding the House of Commons» (1943), a remarkable critique of «rationalism in politics» by a Burkean - minded statesman.

Wilson's first argument was against the cavalierness of same - sex marriage advocates, who propose a massive social change with little idea how it will shake out:

Written in an engaging and aphoristic style, Against Christianity is a splendid little dustup that will be of particular interest to those familiar with the main players and their arguments.

Spend a little time with Google and you'll learn that the argument for this is quite strong.

Be a smart little lamb and come up with an intelligent argument.

The term is often little more than a way to dismiss the ideas and arguments of others so that you don't have to consider their ideas and have a conversation with them.

By the way, the first quote you mention on the nature of heaven has very little to do with your argument.

The problems with arguments like this today is that they bear little resemblance to Pascal's wager as we can find it in Pensees.

Although all the pain Faust suffers may be a fairly good argument that it was not pride possessed him, yet to test this further I will employ a little precautionary expedient which I invent with great ease.

Yet little official Church teaching has engaged with its arguments in a detailed and coherent way.

The problem with this argument is that it proves too much rather than too little.

Particularly in the case of commercial messages, language becomes a surrealistic, frenetic, high - volume self - ridicule with little or no cognitive content, let alone defensible arguments.

I feel remarkably blessed to be faced with little more than petty arguments and silly resentments in my life... especially in a world of so much injustice.

Consequently, this argument contributes very little either toward defending the cognitive significance of Stapp's proof or toward clarifying the status of the unknowable spin values with which the proof deals; the same can be said of his argument defending the general significance of talk about possibilities.

Because the two positions are so invested with the strong emotions aroused by power relations, there is little likelihood that rational argument can change them.

Second, perhaps if you would actually address the posts that have been cut and pasted in response to your arguments with something beyond double talk and hiding behind recitation of scripture that means little to those who do not believe, and actually state viable, well thought out arguments to said posts, then the board could move on to more meaningful discussion.

Whether it's on a Sunday, Tuesday, a bad work day, or because of an argument with a friend, little indulgences often make us feel better.

With one MVP candidate instead of two, the argument for an all - in offseason was a little less convincing.

I get what you're saying I really do and maybe just maybe with a little luck we could have got a positive result but firstly my argument is why would you pay # 50m for a striker and not play him and why would you play someone in defence that's never played there before against the best team in England, secondly we have had referee decisions go our way many times but that's just how it goes.

You guys really need to monitor these situations a little more closely if you're going to come up with bullshit arguments.

your poor arguments let you down buddy, and believe me i like to discuss with you even though you» r a little bit violent and insulting at times....

Chelsea's David Luiz has been a big talking point, having fallen down the pecking order since a fall - out with coach Antonio Conte, and with his replacement Andrea Christensen thoroughly impressing in his place, you can have little argument about his exclusion.

With a Champions League spot virtually unattainable, there is no logical argument for saying that results will suddenly improve and, other than pride, there will be little to drive the players forward.

When one spouse has had very little to do with caring for and raising the child or if during the initial separation the child has been made a part of disagreements and arguments, the court will need to know that.

I think the sign off from CRA above says it all... Just like when you read a voter ballot on propositions, I go straight to the source of who is behind the voice, and CRA consistently has used this «trace» argument time and again, just like the chem companies do with the lead in lipstick (I just attended the Teens Turning Green national summit, and found the debriefing almost verbatim to the CRA «counterpoint» above... it's only a «little» lead, not enough to... blahdeblah, times «x» amounts of applications per day times «x» amounts of other products with «trace» amounts, ad infinitum...)

Ii has little to do with proving your credentials and more to do with explaining your argument.

While I agree in large part with her point, I'm a little wary of the common argument «If indigenous people do it, it must be good and natural».

From little kids to the teenagers, try to stay positive with them and avoid any type of negativity, from fights to arguments to overstepping your authority.

It gives those of us who are a little granola (not organic, vegan, made with nothing but love granola) a bad rep.. That goes for both sides of every argument.

The first argument made by the journal (and the Sears pediatricians) is that crying - it - out is stressful for babies, flooding their sweet little brains with hormones such as cortisol that interfere with healthy brain development.

However, the argument and the conviction of Fayemi have been that the outcome of that election had little to do with the Ekiti people as anti-modernists.