There's
little debate here: Arizona safety Deone Bucannon led with his head when he hit Cincinnati wide receiver A.J. Green.
Not exact matches
At the risk of writing something cohesive, I'm just going to ramble a
little here with some thoughts on GDP and the whole recession
debate... these opinions and typos are strictly my own, except when I'm referencing other people's opinions, which I probably agree with.
I was going to post a comment but thought better of it... There is
little room
here for respectfull and educated discussion or
debate.
Without going into details
here, there are too many assumptions in dating techniques used by evolutionists, but don't take my word for it... just do a
little unbiased research on «flaws in dating techniques» and go through these sites just to get you started for the major flaws in evolution that even evolutionists can not
debate.
As for the predictions of my hypothesis on the existence of God; that is a
little outside the scope of what I desire to
debate here on David's site.
FOXO3 is involved in many relevant mechanisms, so there is plenty of room to
debate cause and consequence
here, and
little in the way of settled answers.
Ok firstly, I'm not
here to
debate on a bodybuilders level of protein consumption and what is too much or too
little to become Mr. Olympia.
I did do a no makeup post one time, but I think I had a tan... because I seriously
debated this
little gem right
here, but HERE it is!!!!! I am doing a few pictures to show you the Continue Readin
here, but
HERE it is!!!!! I am doing a few pictures to show you the Continue Readin
HERE it is!!!!! I am doing a few pictures to show you the Continue Reading...
Imagine someone beginning a
debate by saying, «I am arguing that kids have too much [substitute «too
little»
here for the pro-homework side] homework but I must admit that I have no idea how much they currently have.»
Here we are in the 21st Century having our comfortable little debates about things here, while that has to be part of the energy challenge
Here we are in the 21st Century having our comfortable
little debates about things
here, while that has to be part of the energy challenge
here, while that has to be part of the energy challenge....
And, last time I looked, there's precious
little censoring of true
debate going on
here... in fact, there's very
little in the way of defense of the science and math that's being
debated here.
So far,
here in the United States, public
debate over climate change has been
little more than an endless series of arcane scientific and political talking points tossed back and forth on the Internet between those who believe AGW will destroy the planet and those who believe the whole thing is a massive hoax.
And so there is
little point in further
debating this issue
here, as it has left the realm of the empirical.
Yet their whole budget is being identified as falling within the AGW
debate... So really, the only revelation
here is how
little honesty the title has.
However, it is perfectly obvious I have
little to lean
here as the discussion starts with an assumption that nuclear is evil, and the objective is to fire off as many
debating points as possible, no matter how ill thought out and unsubstantiated.
Lucia made a heroic attempt to explain to Rice that there are more than two positions in the
debate — read her précis
here — but to
little progress, such is the limit on dialogue imposed by the astronomer's personality or capacity, it's not clear which.