Sentences with phrase «little deeper i think»

In her defence she assumed David Cameron would win the referendum in 2016 and had given little deep thought to Brexit issues before taking over as prime minister.

Whenever you have free time I would urge you dive into municipal bonds a little deeper I think you'll find huge opportunities.

You would have to conclude that Florida State University President Eric J. Barron needs to do a little deep thinking about what his institute stands for.

Not exact matches

«I just think you ought to be a little careful about expecting policy makers to have personal and deep expertise in each of the areas that they make policy in,» Schatz said.

«To be sure, it is difficult to tell, but if we dig a little deeper into the nooks and crannies of the 2014 price action, I think we see a market that is very concerned about Fed tapering.

You can listen to the full interview here but I thought it would be helpful to recap the interview and dive a little deeper around who we are, what we do here at Acquirent.

French has done a great job of branding himself, and his company, as link building extraordinaries — so I wanted to pry a little deeper and see what his thoughts were on some more off - the - cuff subjects, and also, hear a little more depth about the Ontolo link building toolset.

I don't say the things that I've said to rile you or hurt you, but to make you think a little deeper and to look a little harder for the Truth.

I think this question requires that we dig a little deeper and ask why we need phones.

I think that if you dig a little deeper and see it used correctly, it is not offensive at all.

Not to be disrespectful but I think you are getting a little too deep witht his one.

The overarching weakness, he thought, was «a deep need to fulfill the emasculating and benign - to - a-fault role of the good little boy who pleases Mom by following all rules (the civil law, school rules, conventional morality, politeness, etc.)[while] remaining unthreatening and unphysical.»

This I can affirm; the book is informative and thought - provoking, with deep insights which are at times more than a little inspiring.

I happen to believe that every little thing we think, say and do reveals something about our deepest selves.

Tomorrow we will dig in to 2 Timothy 3:16 a little deeper, and I will present a translation which I think fits the context better than any of the above and helps make much more sense of the text.

John: I think if he is trying to make a point, though, he should go into it a little deeper to what he's trying to get at.

This is a little odd for us to think about, but this was a way for them to show the deepest grief possible, and we see it happen in several other places in Scripture as well.

But a deeper reason than mere contrariness motivates Fish's literary criticism; and to read his earlier work in the light of his latest Milton book points to a feature of his thought too little noted in the past.

As I settle in deeper, scenes swirl around me — little pieces of other people — dull and unremarkable, yet somehow thought - provoking.

While these might be a little bit of a task to make (the thought of using an at home deep fryer kind of scares me) Whoa do they look delicious.

I would still do the water bath but be sure you don't put the water any deeper than halfway — I would even go a little less than half way I think.

My waffle iron is super deep though and so I think they were a bit too thick and ended up a little chewy.

Well it didn't dawn on me until recently to think a little deeper about how they continually get milk from the cows.

Went a little wild with this recipe and would rave, but I think you know how incredibly good it is... I'm presently knee deep in «tweens» who love it as a sandwich with your ice cream recipes as filling.

I think air - frying is a healthier alternative to deep - frying if you use a very little amount of a healthier cooking oil.

This sounds a little to detailed, but I think it's one of the reasons they like Heath deep.

Been brilliant for England and I really think it's his best position playing a little deeper.

I think Arsenal need to modify it a little, to build the attack from the back easier and to dominate with more midfielders in deeper area.

Lacazette, Slimani, Icardi etc have all been getting goals for all their respective clubs and I think Wenger should have dipped his hands a little deeper into our funds to buy one of them.

So wait a minute.Are Arsenal looking for a defensive midfielder or a box to box player.I'm really disappointed in Xhaka's defending.He's very good with his long passing but I don't think he's the best option when it comes to box to box.In Arsenal he's normally used as the defensive midfielder particular deep lying playmaker and this actually means that we need someone who is fantastic at attacking and can also do very well defensively so as to compliment for Xhaka's defensive short comings.Ludo Goretzka is very good defensively from the little I've seen but I don't really know much about his attacking qualities.But I also hope Arsenal does not forget about Mario Lemina.He's a complete midfielder and to me has the capabilities to be one of Europe's best if given the chance.He can defend very well and attack very well.He's a player Juventus would regret selling.As for Goretzka I know he's very good defensively but have» t seen much of him in terms of attack.If he's as good as in attack I'd sign him.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Don't you think UConn might have gone a little deeper in this year's tournament if their All - America, Caron Butler, had come back for another year?

I think campbells rating is unfair truth be told he had a decent first half display and he would have scored twice, second half the whole team dug deep and gave little forward which is good considering we were defending a three goal lead.I agree with some of the ratings but I feel campbell, bellerin, podolski, chamberlain and sanogo put in a huge shift defensively and attack wise they deserve at least a 6 or 6.5.

And as every Arsenal fan, although little I had some hope, despite deep inside me knowing that it will hardly happen, I thought the rest were so bad, we'd win at our own game, but no.

Which is why, ultimately, we kind of have to hope that he's being a little hasty, or a little cute, or just a touch diva - ish, and that deep down he is actually thinking: Get me somebody that can organise a plane to Russia and I'll get on the plane to Russia.

@victorvictory — a little bit like having a beautiful girlfriend that you know you'll never hold on to — deep in your heart you think it will all be fine and dream of the years ahead being full of romance and riches, and so you continue.

Walcott is only a better finisher and maybe a little bid faster, however, sterling has qualities like dribbling and penetrating, passing, and less injury prone player... Actually players like sterling would help us to break down organized and deep defense line (yesterday game as an example)... Ox is more similar to sterling but you all know Ox is very very injury prone player... I think if sterling to leave liverpool for an English club, then it will be for city or chelsea because they can afford better offer and salary...

«I don't know that we're as deep or as experienced as we were last year, but I think the whole league is a little less of that.

There's probably a couple teams that are a little deeper that might have a chance, theoretically, of going farther, but I think we're in the mix with the high - end teams.»

Minus some flashes from both Sead and Iwobi, and a workingman - like effort from Elneny, we learned very little... so here are a few of my observations from today's game, which highlight my concerns about this team moving forward... the fact that Mertz started this game, regardless of our injuries or those being «rested», should be a serious red flag for any true Arsenal fan... if Wenger is preparing to use Mertz with any regularity then the whole thing is a moot point because we are in deep shit... the fact is no quality team would ever have this tin soldier anywhere near there starting eleven except to groom their youthful players, who in turn should be playing in this type of game instead... I can only hope he was simply throwing him a bone for the FA appearance and for agreeing to stay on following the season, but I think the most likely answer is that Wenger's fragile relationship with the fan - base can't be ignored so he felt his experience was a safer bet... unfortunately not a positive choice for a team trying to move forward (same old, same old)

The latest left back to be rumoured to be in Brendan Rodgers» sights is Ben Davies of Swansea City, and as his raw numbers looked more favourable, I thought I'd dig a little deeper.

in form up to Taddei's exit, I thought I'd try and dig a little deeper.

If your answer to this question is «to raise brand awareness» or «to make more sales», you need to think a little deeper.

If we think a little deeper, we may think of sexual and verbal abuse as part of domestic violence.

Since 3 year old kids are not well known for keeping deep and meaningful conversations, I have to think of ways to connect with her, or she becomes a little monster that nobody can tame.

I don't think I would ever buy used cloth diapers its sad to say but some babies are born with infectious diseases but cloth diapers are a great idea my daughter gets horrible rashes from pampers diapers and Huggies wipes I currently use luvs diapers and seventh generation wipes luvs diapers are cheaper don't give her rashes and hold up throughout the night as my daughter hates to be woken up from a deep sleep to be changed but she sleeps a good 8 hours at 6 months old and only pees while sleeping but I'm considering cloth diapers they seem a little more reasonable

Sit down, take a deep breath, and think of your sweet little bundle.

I've personally tried various other models and this is the only one that really has thought of everything (except one major thing which I'll explain further down in my review) It has a really nice deep seat, over the shoulder padded straps (super important when the littles figure out how to push themselves up in a seat.

As such, I'm finding it a little difficult to do certain types of projects without a second person keeping track of the baby — projects that require deep thought for more than the couple minutes it takes for my baby to cross the room and scale the steps before I need to get up to fetch him.

So often we don't want to take the time to dig a little deeper, thinking that it's too time consuming, yet arguments can linger over the rest of the day, creating a pall over what should be a loving day of connection and respite from our busy lives.