There is very
little dialogue in the film and Tsai uses long takes with minimal camera movement to emphasize the boredom and unhappiness of the characters.
There's
little dialogue in the film, and what's there can't even define the people we see, let alone give them names outside of the credits.
There's very
little dialogue in the film.
There is very
little dialogue in the film, with long stretches playing out in the relative quiet of sound effects and sparse music that made every cough and seat shift in the theater a part of the building tension.
Her performance is particularly remarkable given that there is
little dialogue in the film.
Not exact matches
In this obscure indie film, two little read - comic books come together in a subtle, dialogue - heavy character study that plays out like a slow - burning portrait of good and evil in the modern worl
In this obscure indie
film, two
little read - comic books come together
in a subtle, dialogue - heavy character study that plays out like a slow - burning portrait of good and evil in the modern worl
in a subtle,
dialogue - heavy character study that plays out like a slow - burning portrait of good and evil
in the modern worl
in the modern world.
In the end, the movie is still a musical, entirely sung through with
little or no spoken
dialogue scenes,
filmed on a big theatrical set.
The actual sound design of the
film is a
little less impressive; while wholly clean and clear
in presentation,
dialogue is a bit flat and the use of the surrounds is a
little erratic.
Hannah was given too
little to do
in the first
film, and she does her very best to make Tarantino's samey, show - off, adolescent
dialogue feel as though it could have come from her character's mouth.
A fast - paced,
dialogue - driven, well - constructed
little film about the immorality of our times, specifically playboy Roger (Campbell Scott) and how he decides to give his 16 - year old nephew (Jesse Eisenberg)
in town a crash course
in how to get laid after his nephew asks for his help.
Affirmative.This is not your ordinary western.Long
dialogue and stretching events, alongside with a political agenda of misdemeanors.And Willie
in the middle.The goat.Furthermore, the finale seems a
little bit of propaganda whether it be over a justified «party» or not, it still is considered a non-argumentative propaganda without evidence.The whole physical hunting is more than satisfying.Polonsky knew he wasn't fully charged but it's an entertaining
film all
in all.
The plot really takes a while to pick up with very
little in the way of
dialogue; by the time the lead characters reveal a portion of themselves, it is already deep into the
film and it seems late, granted the run time is just under 90 minutes.
Two
films came out this year that had brilliant cinematography and very
little dialogue, the difference is mad max didn't put me to sleep and it had action scenes that pushed the story forward rather than happen
in the background and force the audience to squint to even make out what's happening.
There is almost no music
in the
film (and when there is, it's
little more than an ambient throb), and there are long stretches devoid of
dialogue.
In the
film's instant - classic opening, Spielberg uses
little dialogue as he follows Rudolf Abel (Mark Rylance) through what looks like a routine but also includes a tiny, crucial bit of spy - craft as he picks up a coin containing a coded message on a park bench.
I won't spoil it, but the
dialogue that Edgar does have
in the
film becomes so much more effective because there's so
little of it.
Because its plot is that simple, it gives director Robert Eggers room to play with the
film's atmosphere, and sow fear
in ways that require
little dialogue.
In the tradition of Tati, the
film has very
little dialogue.
A 5.1 Dolby Digital track is somewhat underutilized and a
little quiet, but there is also a lack of any real need for bombastic five - channel audio pyrotechnics
in the
film; all that you need know is the
dialogue sounds clear and the indie soundtrack is appropriately evocative of the Chelsea underground nightlife.
He talks about how this
film is a fairytale and how he loves the
little girl he cast and how honest she is
in her complete inability to be anything other than herself (and, damnably, how much he let her ad lib her
dialogue and thus alter his
film).
It's the
little touches that culminate to create an atmosphere of horror, and a prime example
in this
film is the subtle, yet almost constant, rumbling noise
in the distance, under the character's
dialogue.
He even sets Return to Waterloo's narrative to the album's music, incorporating very
little dialogue in the process, and as such the
film suggests a visual LP.
There's true wisdom
in the available option to watch the
film with not only an intermittent
little - red - pill icon that branches the viewer to different portions of a 30 - minute interview with Murch (wherein he discusses the specific tricks and techniques), but also his genius work (along with Lalo Schifrin's score) isolated from the
dialogue track —
in 5.1, to boot.
The comic highlight is a wonderfully cheeky display of solidarity when one of the friends is diagnosed with dementia but there are many
little laughs along the way and each ensemble member finds a way to shine
in a
dialogue heavy
film.
Prior to that, there's some good stuff going on, and Cody generally restrains herself from her tendency
in prior
films to show off with
dialogue and references (I'm OK with her slipping
in a
little Ladies and Gentlemen, The Fabulous Stains just»cause I like it - but you couldn't resist, could you, Cody?).
Although he mostly shows it with snippy
dialogue and rigidly controlled schedules, Daniel Day - Lewis» Reynolds Woodcock is a fussy
little dude, something made especially clear
in a deleted scene that Anderson recently released to promote the
film's upcoming home release, showing the Woodcock siblings descend from prodding at each other into a full - on food fight.
I liked Iron Man enough to be a
little nervous about the sequel, especially after seeing the
film's star, Robert Downey Jr., marooned
in Sherlock Holmes, which reached for that same mix of cool special effects, kinetic camerawork, clever
dialogue, and mildly kinky characters and missed by a mile.
Appropriately titled To the Wonder, the
film has Malick's stamp written all over it: Philosophical voice - overs uttered
in hushed tones to a haunting orchestral soundtrack, panoramic displays of the physical beauty of nature, a story that features
little dialogue, and an untranslatable feeling for the spiritual.
Also, the vulgar
dialogue that appears
in the novels as well as the
film that serve
little purpose
in moving the story forward, and generate a creepy tone.
But while there are some genuine insights and well - pitched performances (Eric Stoltz and Annabella Sciorra are appealing as the central pair, but Carlos Jacott and Chris Eigeman steal the
film in supporting roles), the prickly
dialogue that marked out «Kicking and Screaming» only spikes intermittently, and so the
film overall goes down just a
little too easily, a
little too unremarkably.
From the
little bit I'd seen and read about «20th Century Women», I felt heading
in that this
film was going to be a
dialogue - driven, light melodrama about characters dealing with the meaning of their lives.
Just like the first
film, Before Sunset is driven by its
dialogue and locales, and for those with
little tolerance for
films that don't showcase a chase scene or an explosion at five minute intervals, you may find it talky and inconsequential, but at least it's only 80 minutes
in length.
Oldroyd,
in his
film debut, shows a remarkable confidence: There's no background music and
little dialogue; instead, we hear the wind whipping through the fields like an angry banshee, and the click of Katherine's teeth as she clamps her mouth shut, presumably
in order to make a sound
in the endless silence of her new home.
The visually - captivating movie marks the directorial debut of Tokyo's Kana Tomoko, who mostly lets the pictures do the talking
in a
film featuring precious
little in terms of
dialogue.
In the
film, which has
little dialogue, the director uses sound to convey the disorienting feeling of Peter Greene's schizophrenia... and here's the obligatory clip.
This is partly thanks to the brilliant craft of cinematographer Caleb Deschanel, who worked closely with director Carroll Ballard so that they could tell a story largely
in images, especially
in the first half of the
film, which has
little dialogue.
In advance of its worldwide release on Netflix, I spoke to Mike Flanagan and Kate Siegel about why the
film's production was so secretive, the challenges of doing a
film with
little dialogue, and why we should all be excited for Ouija 2.
Clocking
in at a shade under an hour and a half, with very
little dialogue, the
film has about the consistency and depth of a comic book, albeit a very well - drawn one.
This disc's Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo track does a capable job with the
film's workmanlike audio design -
dialogue is clear and natural, «Death and the Maiden» sounds nice as a result of accurate fidelity, and although there's very
little in the way of exciting audio moments, the few gun shots and loud crashes come through smashingly.