Sentences with phrase «little evidence for these claims»

There's relatively little evidence for these claims as of right now.

Not exact matches

Fast's last bit of free trade - betraying intellectual rot is in the claim that «there is little, if any, evidence that the system has made dairy, egg and poultry unaffordable for the average Canadian.»

Barnett contends that the criticisms of a strong patent - rights system overlook recent empirical evidence and have overestimated the impact and scope of problems including «patent trolls» (firms that own patents but do not manufacture products), «royalty stacks» (the total demands of multiple intellectual property holders for remuneration leave too little revenue left for the manufacturer), and «patent thickets» (complex and conflicting legal claims that increase transaction costs for manufacturers).

I would point out however... that it is you who is claiming an absolute definition for the word so, perhaps while you wait for my «exegetical evidence», you might provide a little of your own substantiating your usage of the term?

@ Dale — just one little flaw in your claim: there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Jesus was God, or a god, and there is no evidence that someone named Jesus came back to life after being dead for three days.

There is little or no evidence for much of what she claims is true — really — the earth was destroyed by water because angels mated with humans?

What's more, all those claims you hear about milk being crucial for bones are a little thin on evidence.

For example, Thaler and Sunstein's claims about the benefits of opt - out schemes are belied by little evidence it increases donations.

But there is little evidence to support these claims, so the evolutionary explanation for the zebras» stripes has remained murky.

If weight lifting is so awesome for burning calories because you're burning more calories while you're resting (a claim that is made over and over again with little clinical evidence to back it up), how come the resistance training group in this study did so poorly in losing weight?

Though some would claim otherwise, there is very little evidence that raw meat offers any measurable health benefits for our dogs.

According to the ASPCA though, there is little evidence to support the claim that these laws make communities safer for people or other companion animals.

For sure, the technical rebuttals to the specific claims compete with balance of evidence arguments and a little bit of playful trolling for the attention of anyone who actually cares about the detaiFor sure, the technical rebuttals to the specific claims compete with balance of evidence arguments and a little bit of playful trolling for the attention of anyone who actually cares about the detaifor the attention of anyone who actually cares about the details.

Though Pixiq attempted to find document shady connections between Norman and Big Ag they came up short, but did manage to find enough evidence to support claims by the largely conservative Tampa Tribune editorial board's that Norman is «a deceptive, self - interested politician who has displayed little regard for ethical behavior.»

(The fact that they all are is conclusive evidence that there is little or no scope on real planets for changes in «greenhouse» gasses to have significant temperature effects — even if the process worked just the way the AGW theorists claim!)

In no other science would their weak correlations and claims of existence of interdependent cycles based upon little more than raw periodograms be accepted as rigorous «evidence» for their conjectures.

If I had to label myself, I would say I am a lukewarmer - but having grown up in the 1970's with the «Late Great Planet earth» claptrap, along with Howard Ruff, the 1970's ice age, the end of oil (1970's vintage), I have little to no toerance for apocalyptic claims based on evidence that is not substantially different from noise.

Hoegh - Guldberg's basis for claiming «little evidence» was totally irrelevant, if not dishonest.

It's not a long time, but then again, history is moving quickly these days, and its long enough for us to say that there's little evidence for this nearly universal claim.

BC Injury Law And ICBC Claims Blog Subjective Soft Tissue Injuries And Judicial Scrutiny Last year I criticized the often recited judicial passage stating that «``... the Court should be exceedingly careful when there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury and when complaints of pain persist for long periods extending beyond the normal or usual recovery...» and pointing out that these comments should no longer be used given Supreme Court of Canada's reasons in FH v. McDougall.

«With the Enterprise Act provisions applying to policies incepted or renewed from 4 May 2017, claims under such policies are likely to be accompanied by demands for damages with little concern about the evidence in support,» he says.

... petitioner failed to produce evidence that the claimed expenses were for prescribed activity, and he had little regard for physician's advice on sexually related matters.

Main findings from the review of caselaw on WSIB adjudication (see also Chart) point to the regular disregard of the treating health professional's medical opinion about whether return to work is safe; the reversal of benefits promised to the most vulnerable injured workers (those with permanent disabilities approaching «lock - in» of benefits); wrongful denial of compensation based on «little or no evidence» of pre-existing conditions; and undue targeting of workers with psychological injuries for denial of claims and for surveillance.

As with the Lumia 650, Microsoft's launch patter for the 950 and 950 XL was somewhat meaningless, as it claimed that the two devices had been designed «for the fans», despite little evidence to support that.